17 June 2009

“Beating and Torturing Palestinian children.” by Jonathon Cook

Nazareth: The rights of Palestinian children are routinely violated by Israel`s security forces, according to a new report that says beatings and torture are common. In addition hundreds of minors are prosecuted by Israel each year without proper trial and are denied family visits.

The findings by Defense for Children International,(DCI) come in the wake of revelations from Israeli soldiers and senior commanders that it is “normal procedure” in the West Bank to terrorize Palestinian civilians in the West Bank, including children.

… In one of the most disturbing testimonies, a soldier said he had witnessed his commander attacking a four-year-old boy playing in the sand in Gaza…

Such revelations have grown in number since the Breaking the Silence began drawing attention to the army`s mistreatment of Palestinians in 2004.



What connection does Israel have with the events of 911?

Why did the zionists betray their American Protectors?

— By Ryan Dawson

Israeli connection to 911

When some people hear the word “conspiracy” they start thinking of a tinfoil hat crowd and invoke images of space aliens, paranoia, or a variety of cults and nonsense. Well there are a lot of wacky conspiracies about many things but that does not mean that conspiracies don’t or can’t happen. For example, the Iran Contra Affair was a massive government conspiracy hidden from the press and public for years. It happened in my life time and it involved billions of dollars and multiple countries. This was a case where one part of the government did not know what another part of the government was doing. Thousands of people were killed, mulitple countries in Central America as well as Iran and Israel were involved and yet it was kept as a total secret from the media or perhaps by the media for years. Not only was it possible to hide this from the public but most of our own government was unaware of what covert activies were bing done by the small cabal inside it and the CIA. Likewise much of the CIA didn’t even know what a compartment in the CIA was doing. Many of the players forced to testify to the Wlash Commission avoided trouble and were allowed to continue to be in government or are still currently serving now. The CIA as well as Manucher Ghorbanifar and the Israeli hawk Michael Ledeen funded their activities with illegal drug and arms sales. The blackmarket weapons trade and the sale of illegal drugs such as cocaine and heroin are rutine methods to finance black ops. In fact the some of the same people Michael Ledeen and Ghorbanifar have themselves neck deep in the niger forgeries which acted as a central lie to create a pre-inavsion WMD propaganda in order to start a war with Iraq.

The Iran Contra has since been admitted to but many of the people involved did not get into trouble. They were given presidential pardons either by Bush Sr. or Bill Clinton. Most of them still have jobs and are working in the government right now! A lead investigator into Iran Contra who gave many of the key suspect immunity, was Lee Hamilton, he was late chose to be part of the 911 commission. We’ll talk more about that bunch later. It is a stone cold fact that known Iran Contra criminals who were part of that conspiracy are working in the government right now. The CIA and Mossad have gotten away with countless covert operations and false flags. There are too many to name. So for those who think a covert operation or conspiracy can’t happen, you need to open a history book, or at the very least start doing some online research. You can not assume that these terrible things will be on the TV news. History shows the opposite. The Main Stream Media in the US sides with the liars. They acted as nothing but propaganda in the build up to war with Iraq. Each talking head gave the pentagon approved account and dissenting voices were ignored and smeared. So to reject conspiracies as a whole just because there are some kooks who think the moon landing was fake or Elvis is still alive etc is no reason to just reject the concept all together. I have had people tell me conspiracies never work and that they can’t be done because someone always snitches. Well that argument just does not float in reality. There are way too many counter examples of successful conspiracies and Hoaxes. See here CIA’s Secret Wars and that’s only a fraction.

Iraq War Planned Long Before 911

As soon as puppet Bush got into office, his handlers went to work actualizing their long pushed-for plans for Iraq.

I pointed out in my book that Bush and Blair bombed Baghdad 27 days after Bush was sworn into office. This was well before 911 and had nothing to do with “stopping terrorism.”

Iraq had nothing to do with 911.

Many of us already know who had been calling for war with Iraq – and who had written the rhetoric about WMD etc. Every pre-war lie was a PNAC talking point. All of it was written in PNAC papers in the 90s by the same authors who peddled their lies to the media during the run up to the war. These same people made up the Israeli cabal that wrote an IASPS paper [an Israeli group] called the Afghan Vortex, which called for war in Afghanistan. More infamous is the PNAC groups paper Rebuilding America’s defenses which called for the need for a “new Pearl Harbor.” as well at regim echange in Iraq.

I wrote about this earlier, here. It is worth reposting.

Want to know why I drive the point home that the PNAC and the war in Iraq came from the same cabal? Let’s just look back at some of their policy papers. These quotes are in their own words, from their own website.

These authors, who wrote Israeli policy papers stating the same things, wrote exactly what became the pre-invasion script to Iraq.

1) The PNAC letter to President Clinton in 1998

“The policy of “containment” of Saddam Hussein has been steadily eroding over the past several months. As recent events have demonstrated, we can no longer depend on our partners in the Gulf War coalition to continue to uphold the sanctions or to punish Saddam when he blocks or evades UN inspections. Our ability to ensure that Saddam Hussein is not producing weapons of mass destruction, therefore, has substantially diminished. Even if full inspections were eventually to resume, which now seems highly unlikely, experience has shown that it is difficult if not impossible to monitor Iraq’s chemical and biological weapons production. The lengthy period during which the inspectors will have been unable to enter many Iraqi facilities has made it even less likely that they will be able to uncover all of Saddam’s secrets. As a result, in the not-too-distant future we will be unable to determine with any reasonable level of confidence whether Iraq does or does not possess such weapons.”

“Such uncertainty will, by itself, have a seriously destabilizing effect on the entire Middle East. It hardly needs to be added that if Saddam does acquire the capability to deliver weapons of mass destruction, as he is almost certain to do if we continue along the present course, the safety of American troops in the region, of our friends and allies like Israel and the moderate Arab states, and a significant portion of the world’s supply of oil will all be put at hazard. As you have rightly declared, Mr. President, the security of the world in the first part of the 21st century will be determined largely by how we handle this threat.”-1998 Abrams and Perle.

Is that not verbatim what was used as propaganda in 2002-3 for the pretext to invade Iraq? They even used the same catch phrases: “weapons of mass destruction” and “avoiding inspectors,” which were lies. However, the Israelis were unable to get their war until they could also attach the myth of Saddam’s men meeting with Al Qaeda. William Safire, who received a Guardian of Zion award, wrote this up and then Cheney and Rice (etc) repeated it on TV over and over again.

2) From the PNAC paper, “How to attack Iraq”

“CIA director George Tenet said last January that Iraq already had the “technological expertise” to produce biological weapons “in a matter of weeks.” (lie) And according to former U. N. weapons inspector Scott Ritter, Saddam needs only six months without inspectors looking over his shoulder to build those weapons and deploy them on missiles capable of reaching Israel and other targets in the Middle East.

Yes, Saddam had missiles that could reach Israel. Israel also had missiles that can reach Iraq. The inspectors were removed after they were caught doubling as spies for the US and that is a fact that Scott Ritter pointed out on CNN crossfire back in 2003.

3) Paul Wolfowitz made a Statement before the US House National Security Committee It calls for war with Iraq. He also wrote this letter (1999) claiming that the bloodlust for Iraq was not partisan because a couple of democrats (you might recognize them) Joe Lieberman and John Kerry also agreed with their position. Wow that IS interesting a Vice presidential and a presidential hopeful just so happen to be those two Democrats. Well Wolfowizt was right about something. It was not partisan because both parties are one party on foreign affairs and both parties wanted war. It is still that way.

4) Saddam’s Impending Victory -1998 -Robert Kagan

This one goes on to compared Saddam to Hitler in the first sentences and talks about weapons of mass destruction saying the lid is about to come off and calls Saddam’s palaces the “so-called presidential palaces–” as if they were somehting else and hiding something. Doesn’t that sound familar? It is the same lie that we got later from Judith Miller (Dec 20th 2001 NYT ) who said she learned of secret WMD labs hidden under the presidential palaces from “an Iraqi defector” later in the INC to be. That is about as accurate of reporting as when Fox wants to insert their own rhetoric and quotes as a “source” their infamous line of “Some people say”.

“For Saddam, whose conventional military strength had been decimated in 1991 and could not be restored for many years, weapons of mass destruction provided the quickest, surest, and indeed, the only route back to strategic dominance in the Middle East. As Rolf Ekeus, the former head of UNSCOM, the U.N.’s weapons-monitoring operation, said last year, weapons of mass destruction “make the difference between Iraq’s being a regional power and a major international power.” Finding and destroying Saddam’s ability to produce weapons of mass destruction, therefore, was an essential part of guaranteeing that Saddam could not again threaten neighboring states. The U.N. effort to rid Iraq of such weapons capabilities was supposed to put the lid on Saddam’s grand strategic ambitions. Today the lid is about to come off. Saddam Hussein, weak, isolated, and impoverished as he is, has decided to take his big gamble. The crisis he set off last October when he blocked U.N. inspectors came to a head last week when Iraqi deputy prime minister Tariq Aziz told UNSCOM chief Richard Butler that a number of sites in Iraq—the so-called presidential palaces—would remain off-limits for two more months at least. Saddam Hussein also issued an ultimatum last week calling for the U.N. to wrap up its inspections by May and lift the sanctions.

5) Speaking of Iraq The Neocon Robert Kagan wrote an op-ed in the Washington Times. You can read this on your own time. It basically staes how certain they are of Saddam producing Weapons of Mass Destruction. Bla bla bla same old song and dance that you heard in 2002-3 just before the war.

6) From the PNAC paper, “Bombing Iraq Isn’t Enough. “

“Saddam Hussein must go. This imperative may seem too simple for some experts and too daunting for the Clinton Administration. But if the United States is committed, as the President said in his State of the Union Message, to insuring that the Iraqi leader never again uses weapons of mass destruction, the only way to achieve that goal is to remove Mr. Hussein and his regime from power. Any policy short of that will fail.”

“Mr. Hussein has obviously thought through this scenario, and he likes his chances. That is why he provoked the present crisis, fully aware that it could lead to American bombing strikes. He has survived them before, and he is confident he can survive them again. They will not succeed in forcing him to abandon his efforts to obtain weapons of mass destruction. The only way to remove the threat of those weapons is to remove him, and that means using air power and ground forces, and finishing the task left undone in 1991?

Anyone who cannot see that the Iraq war was carried out and planned by this cabal of dual citizen Israelis must be a fool. They wrote verbatim the pre-war hype five years before the war. These same people later faked the evidence and used their moles in the media to repeat the garbage they’d already been writing in the PNAC. However, until born-again Zionist Christian Bush, no one was stupid enough to listen.

All these “let’s bomb Iraq” papers came from as early as 1998.

7) This one was written on July 30 of 2001, just a month and 12 days before 9/11. It has a big fat picture of Usama Bin Laden on it (they were propping up that patsy early).

“For Bin Laden’s “sleepers”—agents already outside of Afghanistan awaiting the right moment to strike an American target—the situation is probably little better.”

The lies about Iraq and 911 are all inside PNAC papers. The authors are the same people who created and covered up the Niger forgeries. They were involved in an Israeli spy scandal (which STILL has not seen a trial) and at least two of them (John Lehman and James Thompson) were on the 911 commission!

This same lying Israeli cabal was behind the PNAC papers, as well as the lies about Iraq and 911 (when the Mossad was caught filming the towers and living next door to said hijackers). Over 200 Israeli spies were busted in the largest spy ring ever to be carried out on American soil. After 911, Israel was caught spying on the US again – through a Department of Defense (DOD) employee who worked out of an office that met with Israeli generals and was run by Douglas Feith. Feith is a war profiteer whose company, Feith & Zell is partners with Israeli Settler Marc Zell. This law firm got to delegate reconstruction projects in Iraq.

8) This one takes the cake though. It came from Wolfowitz, the Kagans, Lewis Libby, who at that time was with Dechert Price & Rhoads. (pgs 63 and 79 are especially relevant)

Update: Adam Pearlman (”Al Qaeda” spokesman who faked Bin Laden Tapes) is the grandson of Carl Pearlman, who is on the Board of Directors for the Anti Defamation League (a Zionist organization with spies in the US who also support Apartheid states).

For those who need to SEE the lies about WMD that the mainstream media and Neocons repeated over and over (which the PNAC wrote the script for), please watch this video:

These lies were told by embedded Zionist journalists who worked with the Administration’s PNAC members. For example the lie that the lead hijacker in 911 Mohamed Atta met with agents of Saddam was repeated by Willaim Safire of the New York Times (May 9, 2002) came from Gary Schmitt who wrote it in 2001 (for PNAC in the Weekly Standard run by William Kristol the chairman of PNAC). The story was leaked to Reuters on September 18, 2001 just seven days after the attacks. Wow they knew about the lead hijacker as well as a meeting that never took place all within seven days. Reminds me of the BBC report on Iraq that was plegerized from a college student in Florida. This Atta meet with Iraqi officilas lie was repeated by Dick Cheney on national television Dec 9th 2001. He later denied this despite being on tape saying it.

By the way he also calls the Czech Republic by the old name of Czechslovokia. I can’t believe he is the Vice President. Anyway one would think if they had a report (that they read) out of a country that they would at least know the correct name of that country. He didn’t. Bush is still more embarrassing though.

Schmitt wrote “SHORTLY BEFORE getting on aplane to fly to New Jersey from Europe in June 2000, Mohamed Atta, the lead hijacker of the first jet airliner to slam into the World Trade Center and, apparently, the lead conspirator in the attacks of September 11, met with a senior Iraqi intelligence official. This was no chance encounter. Rather than take a flight from Germany, where he had been living, Atta traveled to Prague, almost certainly for the purpose of meeting there with Iraqi intelligence operativeAhmed Samir Ahani.”-source

Essentially this was a complete lie designed to connect Iraq to Al Qaeda and the 911 attacks. It was false, yet all the networks ABCNNBCBS FOX repeated it anyway because it had been in the NY Times. The source for the Times “reporters” were members of the INC (Iraqi Nation Congress) such as Chalabi a man convicted of bank fruad and the person who Wolfowitz had suggested should lead the INC back in the 1990s when he wrote to then President Clinton about regime change. William Safire who made the bogus report was awarded a Guardian of Zion award in 2005 for his defense of Zionism and Israel. He also got a presidential medal of Freedom from Bush in 2006. It’s their way of saying good job. What the Neocons were doing is planting stories from known false sources on willing journalists and then quoting them as sources for what was in reality their own lies to begin with. The triangle was the OSP told INC what to say and then the journalist claimed them as sources and then the pentagon quoted the journalists.

Also working with William Safire at the New York Times was Judith Miller. She made up the lies about aluminum tubes (which physically would not even work anyway) being used as centrafuses in Iraq’s alleged nuclear program. She was also the journalist that spread the story about Saddam having weapons of mass destruction hidden under his palaces or in mobile trucks. Lewis Libby who I will talk about in a bit, also promoted the mobile weapons labs myth as well as the myths about Iraq’s Anthrax.

It turns out they didn’t have any. Libby wrote the Anthrax speech that Collin Powel read like a sucker to the UN. Every claim was false. This was also an attempt to link 911 to Iraq by claiming that the anthrax attacks that followed 911 may have come from Iraq. They did not. They actually came from Dr. Philip Zack who the FBI has on tape stealing anthrax from a lab in Fort Detrick MD which he had been fired from for his racist antics to an Egyptian employee who he had tried to frame. Judith Miller it would be revealed was also one of the journalists who Libby leaked the name of Valerie Plame to in order to blow the cover of the CIA agent as well as her entire team using the front company of Brewster Jennings & Associates. The reason for that as I will get into later was to cover up more lies and fabrications about yellowcake uranium coming from Niger as well as massive profiteering by the ATC a MIC lobby involving all these same players.

PNAC’S co-founders are William Kristol and Robert Kagan.(CFR) Now Kagan is the most active writer in PNAC. He and both his brothers were part of the team that compiled the modern Mein Kampf Rebuilding America’s defenses… Kagan writes for Kristol’s Weekly Standard and cranked out more propaganda than anyone. The majority of the let’s Bomb Iraq rhetoric from PNAC which was identical to the pre-invasion excuses (lies) that Zionists in the media later used in it’s pre-invasion blitz, was written by Robert Kagan. Here is a guy who wrote speeches for George P. Shultz the former Secretary of State who was part of the attempted cover up of Iran Contra. Shultz also worked for LBJ. He is the former President of Bechtel. Bechtel is second only to Haliburton KBR in terms of war profiteering contracts. Shultz is still currently a board member of both Bechtel and its subsidiarity Fremont (formerly called Bechtel Investments). And you know who has tens of millions invested in Fremont? The Bin Laden Family.

Back to Kagan. Kagan is a member of the Aspen Institute. (Something Libby wrote to jailed Judith Miller about in code. Remember the leaves turning out West in Aspen bit) Now the Aspen Institute was founded by Walter Paepcke and his nephew William Nitze is currently a Chair and on the Board of Trustees for the Aspen Institute. William Nitze is the son of Paul Nitze who used to be the Secretary of the Navy from 63-67 and then Assistant Secretary of Defense. He pushed for an infamous bit of foreign policy called Operation Northwoods! This was a plan to crash drone airplanes supposedly full of Americans into buildings and blame it on Cuba.

So this nut’s son is on the board of trustees and serves as a Chair for the Aspen Institute which his uncle founded and the co-founder of the Project for a New American Century, which also promoted false flags propaganda, and the principle writer of the lies that we know were regurgitated by the press to start a war with Iraq, is also a member. And Kagan is not the only one at Aspen either. Remember that it was Kagan, Libby, and Wolfowitz who compiled the PNAC paper which spoke of the need for a New Pearl Harbor and outlined a plan of Straussian imperialism where the ends justify the means. Do you want to know how deep the rabbit hole goes?

The Aspen Institute has something it calls the “Round Table” bastradizing the term from the fairytales, the Roundtable reads like a whose who of Neocons, Lynne Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle etc… Perle (the Prince of Darkness) was the Defense Dapartment’s chairman of the DPB Defense Policy Board which obviously advocated war with Iraq. Serving with Perle on the DPG was fellow PNAC member Christopher Williams who is also a member of the Aspen Institute with Kagan.

On the Board of Trustees with Nitze is Clinton’s Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, as well as Michael Powell the former FCC director and son of former Secretary of state and mouth piece for Libby Colin Powell. Most notably on the BOT is Billionaire Michael Eisner who at the time of the Iraq war was the CEO of Disney which owns ABC. On Disney’s board of directors sits John E. Bryson who also happens to be on the board of directors of Boeing which invested $20 billion into Richard Perle’s equity firm. Boeing then is offered a deal worth $30 billion (May 2003) to supply the empire with 100 military tanker plane. The deal was approved by Pete Aldrige Jr on his very last day in office as the Chief weapons buyer at the pentagon. On top of that Perle’s Defense Policy Board Advisory Committee consisted an MIC check list with ultra Neocons like Herny Kissinger and Kagan’s and Betchel’s good buddy George P. Shultz as well as yet another Aspen Institute Strategy group member Eliot Cohen. Cohen, a professor and director at the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) at Johns Hopkins University. Guess who they named that after…. Paul Nitze, the Northwoods man. Sick isn’t. Oh there is a lot more but it’s just over kill.

I can talk till I am blue in the face but it doesn’t matter. We got people too interested in chasing down some Illuminati Jesuit masonic weather controlling German death cult to pay attention to facts we can prove and real people with names and positions we can deal with. I know there are certain people that want to make money and sell Armageddons hype Orwellian videos but I just don’t see the point in the sensationalism, it is bad enough how it really is. 911 was an Israeli false flag and the Iraq war was a Zionist/MIC sell that used 911 as a launching pad. I mean the same psychos who wrote about false flags in the past and each pre-war lies were the ones selling the war and who were on the 911 commission.

How one could make a film about 911 and not say anything about Israel is beyond me. One would have to intitionally avoid it.  Some 911 films have even been misleading, mentioning PNAC without telling the origins and then dropping some big names like Cheney and Rumsfeld who actually didn’t write one word of any of the PNAC papers. But I will leave that for the disinformation section. Don’t get me wrong, those two guys are the scum of the earth, but let’s be clear on who did what. Cheney had a central role in abetting the Mossad by personally having the authority to command NORAD moved to his position prior to 911, so that he could personally make NORAD stand down and assure that the planes hit their targets. And yes a plane DID hit the pentagon. I don’t want to argue here about that or get accused of dividing the movement, but you can see that here. This really should not be where our focus is as we already have much stronger evidence about the WTC towers. There is no motive to use a missile, why not just drop the plane? And before you say pilots could not make that kind of flight, let me remind you many of the said hijackers were found alive. So that part of the argument is pointless. They were never on those planes, they were flown by remote control via ultra Zionist Dov S. Zakheim. (another PNAC founder)

A lot of people know a little about PNAC, but very few people have taken a hard look at its origins. PNAC was a spin off from the American Enterprise Institute, and 100% of the members are Zionists. People have also gotten confused between the actual authors and people who just signed their letters. Rumsfeld for example is not part of the special in-group as its chairman William Kristol revealed, ironically on the Colbert report. PNAC was co-authored by the same people who have been caught lying about the Iraq War’s pre-invasion intelligence. We are talking about only around 38 people who helped fabricate evidence and pass it off to the president and journalists (and in some cases fake journalists like Gannon). PNAC’s ideas and statements stem from Israeli policy papers. And PNAC’s papers are comprised by Israeli citizens who are connected to every major Zionists group on earth. Paul Craig Roberts: Agrees with me about Israel. As do many others now.

In fact, PNAC’s papers were written by the very same people who wrote Israeli policy papers and hold dual citizenship with Israel. The war in Iraq and control over energy resources ect is all lined out in Israel’s A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm” which was written by Richard Perle and Douglas Feith. That is just one of many papers this little blood for money cabal cranked out. The IASPS (Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Science) also wrote a paper called the Afghan Vortex a year before the invasion. Note also that the US had troops already in place set to invade Afghanistan before 911.

One principle PNAC author was Paul Wolofawitz. In 1992 Paul Wolfowitz wrote the Defense Planning Guidance, with his former Student Lewis Libby:

The foreign strategy of the US must be “unapologetic, idealistic, assertive and well funded. America must not only be the world’s policeman or its sheriff, it must be its beacon and guide Our first objective is to prevent the re-emergence of a new rival. This is a dominant consideration underlying the new regional defense strategy and requires that we endeavor to prevent any hostile power from dominating a region whose resources would, under consolidated control, be sufficient to generate global power. These regions include Western Europe, East Asia, the territory of the former Soviet Union, and Southwest Asia There are three additional aspects to this objective: First the U.S must show the leadership necessary to establish and protect a new order that holds the promise of convincing potential competitors that they need not aspire to a greater role or pursue a more aggressive posture to protect their legitimate interests. Second, in the non-defense areas, we must account sufficiently for the interests of the advanced industrial nations to discourage them from challenging our leadership or seeking to overturn the established political and economic order. Finally, we must maintain the mechanisms for deterring potential competitors from even aspiring to a larger regional or global role.”

Paul Wolfowitz (a dual citizen with Israel who has a sister living there) is now the retired head of the World Bank, (appointed by Bush) was formerly the Director of Policy Planning in the Defense Department. Like Perle, he was also a “Scoop” Jackson Democrat and worked for Jackson in the 70s. Paul is CFR, a Bilderberg member, part of the Trilateral Commission and the American Enterprise Institute (the parent of PNAC) Paul was a principle PNAC author and he openly admitted in Vanity Fair magazine that they settled on WMD as the excuse to use to get a war with Iraq.

For bureaucratic reasons, we settled on one issue, weapons of mass destruction, because it was the one reason everyone could agree on

-May 2003 Vanity Fair

“we” Settled on WMDs…. who is “we” could it be the Zionist cabal that had been writing about the desire for a war with Iraq and who set up the OSP? he is also admitting that they were just inventing reasons for war to present to the public.

The Weapons of Mass Destruction claim is important because it was the legal reason for the invasion. If they were complying with UN resolution 1441 then the US did not have grounds to invade. please go here and listen to my Feb 10th radio interview which outlines more background on that as well as the sanctions which helped starve half a million people. Allow that statistic to sink in. 500,000 people mostly children starved to death. Can you comprehend the horror of that? It gets worse, but that is an extra tangent for now.

Paul Wolfowitz presented an open letter to Bill Clinton on January 26, 1998 where the opening lines clearly state the desire to go to war with Iraq. “Wolfowitz urged Clinton to recognize a provisional [Iraqi] government headed by the Iraqi National Congress under Chalabi.” Wow sound familiar? This would is what would later become PNAC’s doctrine and US foreign policy.

Later in 2000 PNAC released what is normally referred to as the document more of you are familiar with which is commonly but mistakenly just called “PNAC” and that was PNAC’s magnum opus, the paper, “Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategies, Forces and Resources for a New Century” This is the paper stating the infamous lines about the need for a New Pearl Harbor. The bulk of the document however is about going to war with Iraq. It reiterates what this same dirty cabal had written for Israel’s Prime Minister (1996) Benjamin Netanyahu.

When Israeli intelligence on Iraq had been rejected by the CIA Wolfowitz created his own “Team B” to go over it and work scientifically backwards, that is they started with a conclusion and then set out to prove it by any means possible including just lying. Wolfowitz did not do this on his own, Lewis Libby, Douglas Feith and Richard Perle and others who have recently resigned and or are or have been caught up in criminal activity in the past, all took part. Please see the real list of PNAC’s authors

Interestingly, Ricahrd Perle and Wolfowitz both worked as aides to senator Henry “Scoop” Jackson. In 1970 while working for Jackson (A Democrat!) Perle was charged with two heinous acts, spying for the state of Israel and leaking information about the CIA in regards to its nuclear deterrent program, to Russia. Now keep that in mind because it is very important. It’s the very same things that have happening with AIPAC and the Plame Affair from under Perle and Feith’s offices. Perle is even part of the tax-exempt Henry Jackson Society. He is a trustee for the UACC ( U.S.-Azerbaijin Chamber of Commerce) which worked with Blackwater to get troops in to Azerbaijan using the loop hole that they were not troops but “body gards.”

Boieng invested 20 Million in Trireme run by Richard Perle which was apporoved by Aldridge on his last day at the pentagon just before he took a job with Lockheed Martain. Jermy Scahill wrote:

“The contract was approved by President Bush’s cheif weapons buyer at the Pentagon, Edward C. “Pete” Aldridge Jr., who just happened to be the former president of McDonnell Douglas Electronic Systems which later became part of Boeing. Alderidge approved the deal on his last day at the Pentagon before taking a job with weapons manufacture Lockheed Martain. The deal would go down “as the most significant defense procurement mismanagement in contemporary history,” in the words of Senate Armed Service Committee Chair John Warner, resulting in a cancellation of the contract, amid widespread allegations of cronyism. Former Air Force procurement officer Darleen Druyun went to prison as did a Boeing repreisenative, while Air Force Secratary James Roche resigned.”-p317 BLackwater The Rise of the World’s Most powerful Mercenary Army.

Perle is the nastiest of the nasty. In my mind he is The worst Neocon of them all. He has appropriately earned the nickname “The Prince of Darkness.” Perle along with Douglas Feith and David Wurmser, (all three of them got jobs in the US defense department, Perle and Fieth have had to resign) authored the Israel’s “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm.”

Israel can shape its strategic environment, in cooperation with Turkey and Jordan, by weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria. This effort can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right as a means of foiling Syria’s regional ambitions.

-Israel’s A Clean Break:A New Strategy for Securing the Realm by Richard Perle and Douglas Feith. (under the heading “Moving to a Traditional Balance of Power Strategy

Now all of us that pay any attention to facts, know that Iraq had nothing to do with 911, so just why were we invading them and who cooked up the intelligence to justify it? And who openly wrote about it before we did it? And who was in the US Department of Defense creating groups like the OSP? The Zionist Israeli Firsters that is who. And we have plenty of irrefutable evidence to prove it. But that’s not all, it goes even deeper and gets even more obvious.

While speaking to Wolf Blitzer from CNN, a former AIPAC employee, Perle said of Semour Hersh, the Pulitzer Prize winning journalist who exposed the My Lai massacre of Vietnam and later with the help of Joe Darby, broke the story about the Abu Ghraib torture scandal, “Sy Hersh is the closest thing American journalism has to a terrorist, frankly.” And Perle is the author of at least 4 different IASPS papers.

On March 17, 2003, veteran investigative reporter Seymour Hersh reported in the New Yorker that Perle used his position as chairman of the DPB to solicit $100 million for his security-oriented investment firm,-Trireme, which was his own personal version of the Carlyle Group. But unlike the principals at Carlyle, who at least had the decency to wait until they left government service to cash in on their connections, Perle was attempting to capitalize while still serving as an official adviser to Secretary of; Defense Donald Rumsfeld.

source, 5th paragraph. although, I recommend reading all of it.

Perle helped create The Trireme firm which has tens of millions dollars worth of investments from Boeing a smentioned above. Boeing’s board of directors comprises people like John Biggs, John E. Bryson, Linda Z. Cook, and William M. Daley who also sit on the BOD of major banks and mass media conglomerates. For more on that mess see this. Perle was on the Defense Policy Board Advisory Committee from 1987 to 2004 and his advice was always the same, build and upgrade more weapons. He served as an Advisor to Israel and of course advised them to “buy” (AKA used their earmarked aid on) from MIC companies that Perle profits from. Trireme which collects from venture capitalist also set up by Perle’s partner at Hollinger Inc, Henry Kissinger. Unsurprisingly, Holliger of which Kissinger and Perle sit on the board of directors invested in Trireme. Who else was on the BOD of Hollinger Inc? None other than James Thompson III who served on the 911 commission. Hollinger is a mass media conglomerate with paper such as the Jersalem Post. It was the J Post that put out the myth of the 4,000 Jews not showing up for work on 911. This was a total strawman designed to be easliy debunked and take a focus off of Israel as well as ensnare critics with the lable of anti-Semitism. I was at college when 911 happened and I heard this 4,000 Jews nonsense the very same day before it was even in the J-Post. I was the head of a Palestinian Solidarity group and I had people reporting this to me. I rejected it as nonsense because there was no proof. But someone must have been working very hard to put that discrediting disinfo out there if I could hear about it within 24 hours in a college in Virginia.

In the run up to the war in Iraq, there was a lot of disinformation. Once again most people know what the lies were concerning the WMDs, the Al Qaeda accusations, the mushroom cloud scare tactics, (notice once again how the neocons chose to have Neo-Condi make that loaded fear mongering statement with Wolf Blitzer, from CNN, a former AIPAC employee.) “liberating” the Kurds, (now look at this Bush offers to bomb Kurds ) and lastly the joke of democracy building, which have all been shown to be falsehoods or failures. I picked each of these reasons apart in my book, but I think by now they should be pretty self evident.

What people do not seem to know is who made these fabrications. They assume it was just “Bush” and the vague term “the administration,” or worse yet the new world order/illuminati/criminal elements in the government. Those vague kind of term really don’t say a thing and are left open enough to be interpreted to mean almost anything. Well yes it was people in the administration, but who? Well let’s break it down. AIPAC and the OSP were the two Zionist factions in the government who spoon fed the lies about Iraq which Bush was looking for to the administration to justify an invasion. Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski explains how military officers’ opinions were dismissed or even punished by the civilian cabal brought in from the American Enterprise Institute, (the Parent of PNAC).

…But in fact, my outspokenness was probably never noticed because civilian professionals and military officers were largely invisible. We were easily replaceable and dispensable, not part of the team brought in from the American Enterprise Institute, the Center for Security Policy, and the Washington Institute for Near East Affairs

The Israelis were visiting the DOD without having to sign in and going straight to Feith’s office where the secretive OSP was headed. The same office Lawrence (Larry) Franklin worked for who was sentenced to 12 years in jail for spying for AIPAC the thug like Israeli lobby, who we have learned Rep. Jane Harman (D-Calif.) used AIPAC to help bribe her position as the highest ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee. And whose aid has been suspended thus far for leaking the National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq to the New York Times the same paper Libby leaked classified information to through Judith Miller. Of course another Israeli firster Nancy Pelosi is set to replace Harman and she has already stated she would block attempts to impeach Bush.

Kwiatkowski continues.
In early winter, an incident occurred that was seared into my memory. A coworker and I were suddenly directed to go down to the Mall entrance to pick up some Israeli generals. Post-9/11 rules required one escort for every three visitors, and there were six or seven of them waiting. The Navy lieutenant commander and I hustled down. Before we could apologize for the delay, the leader of the pack surged ahead, his colleagues in close formation, leaving us to double-time behind the group as they sped to Undersecretary Feith’s office on the fourth floor. Two thoughts crossed our minds: are we following close enough to get credit for escorting them, and do they really know where they are going? We did get credit, and they did know. Once in Feith’s waiting room, the leader continued at speed to Feith’s closed door. An alert secretary saw this coming and had leapt from her desk to block the door. Mr. Feith has a visitor. It will only be a few more minutes.� The leader craned his neck to look around the secretary’s head as he demanded, Who is in there with him?

Why were Israeli generals visiting a secretive group in the DOD under the office of the Clean Break authors (as well as PNAC) Feith and Perle where a Spy for the Israeli lobby AIPAC was caught spying on the US? (and trial dates for the rest of it have been bumped up 7 times and growing daily.)

One of the most important scandals in the administration which is finally had its trial Jan 2007, is the Plame outing and Niger forgeries. The Plame Affair involves Lewis Libby, Wolfowitz former student and PNAC author. Now Libby did not go on trial for the Niger forgeries that back story was left out but he did go to trial and got convicted for four of the five charges against him and Bush just commuted his sentence. Libby we discovered got his orders from higher up. Libby of course was part of the Office of Special Plans. Libby’s scandal is complex, please see the above links and listen to my radio interviews 1 and 3 to get into it further.

In Libby’s trial the mask of the media and just how deep its relationships with government officials is was really exposed. Of course there was Judith Miller who had to sit in jail for 85 days before Libby cracked and confessed. She was from the New York Times writing lies about Iraq as explained above, there was also Tim Russert of NBC, Mathew Cooper of Time, and Robert Novak of CNN. Interestingly CNN’s head anchor Blitzer was an AIPAC employee the Israeli lobby who has officials on trial for spying on the US out of the office of Douglas Fieth through Larry Franklin who was at the SISMI meeting with Ledeen and his Iran Contra goons when the Niger forgery documents (which Plame’s team could possibly reveal as false and even trace given that Plame’s husband Joe Wilson had already stated the claims were false) were passed down via the British to Bush’s speeches.

Lewis “Scooter” Libby was Dick Cheney’s Chief of Staff (now resigned after his indictment (which I predicted long before it happened). He was also a presidential adviser. Libby was a lawyer for 15 years for the billionaire “commodities trader” Marc Rich, a fugitive that Bill Clinton gave a pardon to the last hour he was in Office as President. Libby is also among the Republican perverts crowd writing fictional books about underage Japanese girls getting forcefully raped by a bear in a cage, among other disgusting things I see no point in repeating. This kind of work actually fit perfectly with his client Marc Rich if you know about him. That story is rather interesting and it’s in my book, but that’s too big a tangent for now. Seriously, there is something deeply wrong with these people.

Remember that Libby was a PNAC author of Rebuilding America’s Defenses, lies about anthrax, lies about WMDs, leaked information about the CIA, was a lawyer for the Mossad and a Iran Contra agent, was Cheney’s right hand man and after all that he just got his sentence commuted by Bush. That decision was supported by all the Republican primary contenders other than Ron Paul. It was as if the administration just gave him a green light to do whatever he needed to do to create a case for a war and whatever he needed to do to cover their tracks. They told him you just break whatever laws you want and the President will protect you.

The case is we have yet another predominate PNAC author who was central in creating the war with Iraq by using the same lies that were undeniably written by this same group years prior to 911.

Let’s pause from PNAC for a bit and analyse some different “funny business.”

Why was Jack Abramoff, the Zionist criminal lobbyist, paying for congressmen’s trips to visit the sex slavery market. We know other high ranking Republicans knew about Mark Foley for months yet they did nothing. I smell something Much deeper at work here. Could Israel be blackmailing closet gay politicians? Yes.

After John David R. Atchison tried to have sex with a five year old on the heels of story of Senator Larry Craig trying to elicit homosexual sex in a men’s airport bathroom, which followed the sicko Mark Foley sending sexually explicit e-mails to a 16 year old page boy, describing how the 16 year old cums, and of course let’s not forget Governor McGreevey sleeping with an Israeli national, I decided that it is time people take a look at the perverted sexual nature of Bush Administration Syndicate in general for they are one messed up sexually dysfunctional family. Please see this for a better break down of the Evangelists, the flight schools used in 911, the Bushs and Abramoff who arranged trips for congressmen to islands known from sex slavery.

When one understands how deep the Mossad was in 911 and the flight schools and how Atta was spotted on Abramoff casino ships things start to break down with the religious right and how easily blackmailed these men can be with Israel almost literally holding them by the short hairs.

Let’s start with Ted Haggard. he was the Holy Roller caught using crystalmeth and sleeping with a male prostitute was George Bush’s spiritual adviser and according to a documentary by Richard Dawkins, claimed on tape that he talked to the president about once a week on the phone. Now let’s add Karl Rove Karl (mc) Rove was Bush’s former Key adviser hired Jeff Gannon a male prostitute through a fake media front they created, Talon News.

Gannon referenced referenced internal government memos regarding the Plame affair before they were public. Remember that one of the leakers in the Plame Affair aside from Libby was Karl Rove. So Two Bush advisers are or cavort with male hookers and his brother Neil was caught with prostitutes in Asia and his brother Jeb Bush with drug smugglers and is the brother-in-law to family convicted of rape and the bizzar case of sexual molestation of a baby. What is wrong with these people? Speaking of the other Plame-gate leaker, Lewis Libby, he wrote a book about underage Japanese girls not only being raped by men but also a bear. These private mercenary groups like Blackwater (which Feilding is a lawyer for and Joseph Schmitz is an executive) and Dyncorp have been busted in the targeting of civilians and yes human trafficking. Congress and the Senate continue to grant them money anyway but then again our congressmen and Senators are caught up in plenty of their own pervert sex scandals. Just what do these men DO down at the Grove? Reminds me of the Franklin Credit Union affair.

Remember Mary Kay Lettourneau you know the woman who got pregnant after raping her 13 year old student? She is the sister of Joseph E. Schmitz who is a conservative lawyer, former Inspector General of the Department of Defense and executive with Blackwater USA. It was Joseph Schmitz who undoubtably just turned a blind eye to the various profiteering rings in the DoD and the countless abuses of Bremer’s butchering of Iraq and immunities granted to mercenary/terrorist groups engaged in war crimes there. His other brother is John P. Schmitz who was George Bush’s White House counsel before being replaced by Fred Feilding (now Bush’s personal lawyer) who was on the 911 commission and is also a lawyer for Blackwater. Feilding is helping blackewater cover up why 4 of their men were burned and hung on a bridge in Fallujah. The families want to why it happened but Blackwater is not talking. John P. Schmitz was also involved with Iran Contra back when he was an aid for Bush the first, and he refused to testify to the Walsh Commission. What a messed up family.

So we have a rapist, a inspector general who is the executive of a secretive mercenary group and a the former White House counsel who was replaced by a Blackwater lawyer who just so happened to also be on the 911 and is George Bush’s personal lawyer as well. The Schmitz’s family father another ‘John’ John G. Schmitz was a Senator and congressman from California. He was famous for his right-wing views and occasional racist and homophobic remarks. His public career was ended when it was revealed that he had an affair and fathered two illegitimate children. He got in trouble after his 13 month old son (of his mistress) was found with hair wrapped around his penis. I think that explains why his other legitimate children are so messed up. Just to get in this guys head, he bought the house of his hero Joseph McCarthy (Who I call a modern version of witch trial like fear mentality for the insanely religious).

Brother of Geroge Bush, Jeb Bush married a woman named Columba. Columba’s sister is married to John P. Schmitz Jeb Bush and John P. Schmitz are brother in laws. John and Joseph were both law clerks. Joseph was a clerk for the Neocon James Buckley the brother of the famous neocn William F. Buckley founder of the Neocon magazine the National Review. More connection to the media and the government.

So it is not really shocking given the sexually dysfunctional/criminal background of this hollyroller family that they would be involved with Abramoff and Jeb and Hoffman who are people involved with the drug trade, bizzar sex affairs and top Christian evangelist. No one they run a private army that shoot civilians enjoys torture especially sexual torture and make a game out of running cars off the road in Iraq.

have a look at this source. Abramoff was a Zionist lobbyist busted paying for trips for congressmen to visit the Mandarin Islands [such as Delay]. I HAD a youtube video about that but it has been censored. There are some sketchy things there involving child prostitution.

“Dick and Betsy DeVos donate huge sums of money to Republican candidates and causes. In the 2004 cycle, the couple ranked fifth among the highest political donors with $981,846 to Republicans. In fact, from 1990 through 2006, the couple donated $2,491,270 to Republicans with only $1,000 going to Democrats back in 1992.”


What you can see hear is that part of the financial base for these kooks are the very same people getting employed by the Department of Homeland Security of Lieberman and Spector which was created a long with the pre-written Patriot Act during the duress of anthrax attacks on the congress. Why are the PNAC Neocons so tied to private militaries as well as defense contractors? Boeing and Blackwater to Perle, Northrop Grunman to Wolfowitz and Douglas Feith who is their attorney. Feith is also the managing attorney for the law firm Feith and Zell based in Israel also served as a contracting firm dealing with the lucrative no-bids coming out of Iraq,naturally they hooked up their friends. His partner Marc Zell is an Israeli Settler, so obviously a die hard Zionist with no love for Iraq.

What really happened on 911? Poll after poll the majority of Americans believe that the official story of 911 is false and that the government is part of a cover up. (Compare that to Fox News Viewers who staggeringly still blieve in the lies of Saddam being linked to 911 even after the president and vice president admitted that there was no conneciton.) There seem to be four main 911 theories, one from the main stream press and the 911 commission and others from researchers who bothered to look at things like physical evidence, the paper trail, and the money trail. I have a fifth theory which unifies the war in Iraq with the cabal that planned 911. The 4 theories briefly go as follows.

1 Is the official story.
We got caught with our pants down and terrorists did 911. And the wars in the Middle East are part of the greater war on terrorism.

2 The incompetence excuse
There was information available about the coming attacks but because of our incompetence we failed to see it. Terrorists attacked the US. And the wars in the Middle East were based on mistakes (more incompetence) but now we got to stay.

3 They let it happen
They knew full well about the coming 911 attacks but allowed it to happen in order to use it as a pretext to go to war with Iraq and Afghanistan as it was in military and corporate interests (particularly oil) to do so.

4 They made it happen. (They meaning just vaguely the Bush Admin) -AKA 911 was in inside Job.
The Bush government either helped protect the terrorists or simply used them as patsies, and assisted the plane crashes effects with bombs placed inside the towers prior to 911. The wars in the Middle East were about oil. (a problem with this theory is its vagueness. People in this camp will call for an independent investigation. That’s not going to happen and I think there are enough facts available for us to do our own research. [Which I have done]) Another problem with this group is their associations with other irrelevant cult like propositions that do nothing but discredit the rest of it. This will be discussed at the end of this document.

The “911 was an inside job camps” then say the evidence must land you somewhere between 3 and 4 with more research dropping you firmly on number 4. Let me now throw in a 5th scenario

5 The Neocons Made it happen with the assistance of a foreign government, the same government where PNAC’s papers were first written, and the same foreign nation who we have caught spies from who have been stealing secrets from the US about Iran, and who made up the shadow government of the OSP which is who cherry picked and fabricated the lies told about Iraq in order to start that war. The Wars in the Middle East were for separate reasons, Afghanistan was about a few pipelines as noted but more so about controlling large quantities of un-tapped uranium (a reason for both the Russian and US invasions) and secondly for controlling opium as the CIA uses drug money to fund it’s off the book black operations such as the now known massive secret prison systems, (torture camps and human medical/scientific testing). Location-wise Afghanistan is coupled with other color coded revolutions to circle China and Russia with US bases and puppets, (add to that the lesser known negotiations with Japan to allow nuclear subs into the Japanese Sea [pointed at China] in exchange for moving troops from Okinawa to Guam). The main goal however, which the PNAC think tank states, is to keep the eye on the pie: Iran, which Afghanistan and Iraq both boarder. The invasion of Iraq was to solve Israel’s oil crisis and stop the threat of a secular Middle East which would become a true economic player and was a threat to the aggressive state of Israel.

The evidence if it was ALL being stated, especially pertaining to the war in Iraq, would land you in scenario 5. To better understand the Iraq War and why the US invaded go here. <-I highly recommend seeing that link after you finish reading this. This timeline may help beginners as well.

911 was the Mossad. But that is not an Israeli intelligence agency per say it is a terrorist agency for the military industrial complex which feeds off of the hatred of the bigots and useful idiots concentrated in Israel. The US and Israel are not really different countries in a way. The US and Israeli agencies and their Neocon governments work for their own interests and those interests are guided by a racist, political ideology mixed up with a fascist version of a religion and Straussian philosophy. There is a total disconnect between the people of America (the sane ones) and the government. US foreign policy works for Likud Israeli interests first second and third. This is because the Zionists and MIC have overlapping financial interests. But most of all the press is Zionist. There is no war greater right now than the information war. Nothing would fix things faster than taking back the media or totally discrediting the corrupt lying fear mongering war cheerleaders we have now.

A lot of people have written about and shown the problems with official 911 story. There is the demolition of building number 7, there are the firemen’s reports that the fires were almost out, there are numerous reports of secondary explosions etc. Because it has been said on radio and more so because people have made films about it, many people can recite the arguments for the inside job in their sleep. Fire burns buildings; it does not burn on the top of one for an hour or so and then blow it up in a matter of ten seconds, completely destroying everything including the foundations and leaving molten steal in the basements weeks after the event. It is physically impossible.

But what has been hidden from you and the dots which have not been connected in any 911 films is the Israeli connection. 911 has been hit with heavy disinformation. This tactic worked well for Area 51 a secretive base that was wasting trillions of dollars. Because of disinformation and a lot of idiots, if anyone said a thing about area 51 it was unfairly linked to everything from space creatures to crop circles. Currently in 911 “truth” there is disinfo spanning from Bavarian death cults, to a black pope, to lasers from outer space. Do not associate any of that nonsense with what I am saying.

911 was an inside job which was part of a larger plan for perpetual war hatched in Israel. Understand that Israel is not Jewish people OK please get that through your warped heads. Israel is a violent nation that engages in false flag operations routinely and serves the interests of the MIC not any particular ethnicity. For a long time during the Cold War, Israel was the medium the MIC used to bully the Middle East indirectly and increase arms sales across the board. 911 and the recent wars in the Middle East were carefully planned attacks carried out by a faction of Zionist Neocons and the Israeli Mossad. The policy papers that acted as propaganda for the war were written by Dual Citizens with Israel. The equity firms profiting from the Iraq War like Carlyle and Trireme and the law firms processing contracts like Feith and Zell, the Anthrax attack, and the anthrax attack speech, the PNAC documents, the DPG the lies from journalists about Iraq’s WMD are all connected back to the same Zionist cabal in the DOD and office of the vice president. Just think back to the propaganda about Iraq before the war and then go read what PNAC was writing in the 90s.

On top of that the Niger forgeries, which are Clear concrete proof to show that these men were consciously lying, have still not been reported in the Main Stream media. There is no surprise there, they can’t even admit that Israel has Nukes, or any information about multiple spy-rings Spies (Pollard, Art Students, AIPAC, ADL, too many to even name. ) The Niger-gate scandal as well as (the mini-AIPAC) the ATC’s dealings with the MIC were covered up by Lewis Libby leaking information about a BJA CIA agent to the press. He leaked it to exactly the same warmongering trash journalists who had been lying about WMD in Iraq from the start.

Also it was the INC and Chalabi who served as “sources” for these yellow journalists who lied about WMDs. The INC and Chalabi were suggested as replacements to Saddam as far back as the mid 90s by none other than Wolfowitz and Libby. Further more AIPAC the largest Israeli lobby was caught red handed (Rosen & Weissman) spying on the US about Iraq and Iran through moles (Larry Franklin, Gilon) inside the very same offices that were meeting with Israeli generals. (Feith and Perle). Not only was the lobby caught spying but a Zionist lobbyist (Jack Abramoff) was busted bribing congress. [and possibly blackmailing them]. Then in a story that was pulled from FOX News, there was another separate massive Israeli spy ring that had agents living next door to the said hijackers of 911. (Israeli Art students) and on top of that the Mossad with its front (Urban Moving systems) was busted filming 911 and cheering.

The 911 commission was comprised of John Lehman a PNAC member, Fred Feilding Bush’s current Lawyer who is also a lawyer for Blackwater, James R. Thompson a Hollinger BOD member with Perle and Kissinger, and other dubious characters. They did not even address the collapse of Building 7 which the BBC reported fell before it had even fallen. The DoD and the Military industrial complex are not separate they are one in the same.

The 911 investigation was a farce it was on a Scooby Doo level for a detective story. Oh look we magically found a passport of a lead hijacker the same one who we will later lie about (a week later) and connect with Saddam by using a fabricated story claiming that he met an anonymous Iraqi in Prague. Here the war party was lying about Iraq and lying about 911.

Much of the 911 cover up which the MSM just repeated was done by Popular Mechanics a magazine whose editor was B. Chertoff, Michael Chertoff’s cousin. Michael Chertoff of course was the author of the pre-written Patriot Act who quickly became the head of Joe Lieberman and Arlen Spector’s new creation the department of Homeland security. Note that the Patriot Act was passed while congress was under the duress of anthrax attacks which turned out to be from a Jewish American Zionist and the speech that Colin Powell read to the UN was written by Lewis Libby. Were it not for this attack the Act as well as the Department of Homeland Security may not have passed, at least not so quickly. They already had these documents previously written before 911 just waiting for it to happen. Also the US was alreadyin place to invade Afghanistan before 911 happened.

Central banks with the MIC are controlling the show right now. They’re the current cash cow to feed off of Zionism. The Defense department is a corporation, one that was missing trillions of dollars and admitted this the day before 911. The secretary for Policy (Richard Perle, Trireme inc, Hollinger, Boeing) The Army Secretary (Thomas White Enron) The Navy Secretary (Gordon England General Dynamics) The Air force secretary (James Roche Northrop Grumman) all acted in their own personal interests. The Office of Special Plans’ Douglas Feith and Paul Wolfowitz were also Northrop Grumman employees. To better understand how the MIC works See this The USSA a quick look at how the US kills for commercial interests and does not practice the free market principles it pretends to profess. <-very good write up, one of my better ones.

These same criminals were involved with Hoffman and Britannia aviation flight schools run by Christian Zionists, where there were hijackers who were seen in two places at once like Mohamed Atta who was also spotted on9the now convicted Zionist lobbiest) Jack Abramoff’s casino ships. The hijackers just so happen to live next door to an uncovered Israeli spy ring. The flight schools were a false trail easily gobbled up by the left to show incompotence while at the same time reinforcing the idea that there were Muslim hijackers. The said hijackers myth falls apart when 20% of them turn up to STILL BE ALIVE. So if there were no hijackers then the official story is false and then that means the flight school information was also disinformation created to frame patsies and given that Israelis lived next door/with to these agents who were making as much noise as possible and went as far as leaving behind a list with their names on it to be found, means they were actually Mossad. Then seperate Mossad agents get caught on 911 and the information connecting them is classified and the criminals simply deported back to Israel.

Obviously since many of the hijackers are still alive there is no way they could have crashed planes into building or have gone to these flight schools. Israeli Mossad was setting them up with stolen passports, as we will go over.

This is not some illuminati, it is not the Catholic Church, there was no missile hitting the pentagon, it is not Jews in general or America in general, it is not just “THE government,” it is definitely not lasers from space or human morphing lizards. That kind of outright crap is the same kind of discrediting disinfo that was leaked out to mask Area 51 a real formerly secret military base that spent trillions on new toys for the military but was covered up by nonsense about UFOs and aliens with big eyes that were featured on unsolved mysteries and now can be found on T-shirts.

911 was a classic false flag operation by the country which can do no wrong in the eyes of the media and would have nothing to fear from the press or an investigation because they have already been getting away with brutal murder for 38 years while sucking billions of dollars from the US the whole time. [even after attacking a US ship.] The greater story here is how the Israel can be busted murdering Americans in an attack that if you look at the details was irrefutably deliberate and planned, and yet the Main Stream Media made hardly any mention of it other than back pages on a few news papers. And even after 40 years of the survivors telling their stories and making it painfully obvious what happened the Media has refused to report it and there are no investigations. This is why they could lie about Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq without worry when they knew it would sooner or later be dscovered false. They have no need to worry or explain anything (like the demolition of building 7) because they know the press will ignore it and even excuse it. So the story here is not just that Israel can murder people in an attempted false flag, it is that the US media can, has, and will, cover it up. This is because the false flag was set up jointly between a faction in the US (that included LBJ…long story see my All Roads JFK paper) and Israel. Only the Israelis failed to sink a sitting duck before a message got out to the seventh fleet and the operation was blown so they had to go to plan B.. Plan be was to just shamelessly lie and deny all evidence contrary to their claims like a religious zealot immune to all reason and factual evidence. It worked then and it is working now. However because of the web that barrier is starting to crack and we are pushing back in the info war.

Israel was behind 911 and the war in Iraq (though that overlaps with oil interests and many other things) the cabal made it happen. The X-communist Trotskyite Neocon dual citizen Zionists are the driving force behind a war with Iran and Syria. PNAC’s Rebuilding America’s Defenses (RAD) which mentioned the need for a new Pearl Harbor like attack, was based on the Israel Clean Break paper written by Richard Perle. RAD although signed by partially composed by many Neocons was primarily written by Lewis Libby the lawyer for the Mossad Agent Marc Rich who was involved in Iran Contra and the “privatization” of Russia, a regular mafia thug who got a pardon from Bill Clinton. Also in Iran Contra was Elliot Abrams who got a pardon from Bush’s father. [To know more about what really happend in Russia with Gaidar and the Oligarch go read my paper or listen to my audio file here Quick history of Russia school wouldn’t teach you and to learn more about Marc Rich just click on his name and read/listen to my file on him.

The players behind what went down are not secret, they do everything openly. It is almost like they want to be caught as if they are bragging about it. If people can ignore the disinfo and focus on real people which we have plenty of actual documentation for being behind 911 and the following wars, then we can expose these crooks and let the consequences fall on them however they may.

So who did it? To answer this question one should first ask, “who had the power to cover it up?” Who would have the power to censor the media and have total confidence that they could censor the media given an event this size? One look at the non-coverage of Israel’s illegal occupation of Palestine should give you one answer. Nowhere, in the US televised media, do they even mention that there is an occupation. This massive conflict, which one would assume would be impossible to conceal, is totally shielded from the American public. The Occupation is missing from the news and they purposely paint the distorted picture that Israel just defends itself from crazy suicide bombers. This is not something they can hide, or even debate about, the occupation is visible, you can go visit it, and it is widely covered in media outside the US, but you will never ever hear Israel’s crimes even mentioned. There is no news of the Jewish-Only racial colonies that the US calls “Settlements” and “Neighborhoods” reported on Fox, ABCNNBCBS which is really one net work that tells the same stories often in the same order. I will explain why in the media section.

Also there has been no reporting on the second Israeli spy-ring, none, zero, and the first spy ring uncovered was yanked from Fox News.

Even though it is an open secret to the rest of the world, in the US there has been no mention of Israel’s secretly built nuclear weapons. The list goes on… the faction that has nothing to fear from the US media and who could cover up something as huge as 911 or larger are the Zionists of Israel and their allies in the US government and press who all profit through the MIC and investments from fringe element religious organizations who are rewarded with air-time.

One should also look at the list of congressmen on the AIPAC lobby’s “payroll” and then look at the astonishing number who we know had connections the Zionist lobbyist and criminal Jack Abramoff. (who is deeply connected to the Israeli Mossad and 911 as I will show you later).

The second question one should ask, is ‘what did 911 serve’? The answer to that is very simple. The aftermath of 911 led to two different wars, and we all know how 911 was falsely attached to the justifications for America’s wars. Almost 90% of US troops in Iraq (in 2006) think that Saddam had a role in 911 and that the war was revenge for it. That level of total ignorance is mind-blowing. War, of course, is good for select businesses and central banks because wars are debt generators. Iraq was not a threat to the US. They were a threat to Israel, and the same case can be said about Iran. We know who really wants these wars.

There can be no doubt that the press consciously distorted information leading up to the wars, and that they never made any clear pronouncements about how they had been wrong about their lies, with the Weapons of Mass Destruction myth being a clear stinging example. There are people in the US who still believe that Iraq had WMDs or that they moved them to Syria lol. If you want to know who planned 911 then a good place to look would be who do we know planned and then lied about Iraq? (also who has been lying the most about Iran) Who championed the disinformation? Where were the lies coming from? And when was this war really planned and where? The answered to all of those questions are sadly the same. Israel and American Zionists. And that is a fact we can prove.

If you want to know who the Neocons are that orchestrated 911 then you should look at some of their other messes. We will start with PNAC (Project for a New merican Century) and then work backwards from the War in Iraq to 911. It is always important to look at what happened both before an after an event when you are investigating it. The myths told by the media prior to the war in Iraq had been written out in PNAC papers form the 1990s.

I am not the only one talk about this Cabal.

Andreas von Bulow the former German Defense Minister said on the Alex Jones show April 21, 2006 that this false flag operation [911] had to be carried out by a very small group of people. Alex asked him 100? 40? He said less than that. Right after the second break (which on the QuickTime bar would be right in line with Andreas von Bulow’s right ear) Alex talks about the picture getting more clear as the truth about the wars come out. He then talks about the 25 Neocons who wrote PNAC were in high positions in the DOD and white house, and Andreas von Bulow says “sure and part of them wrote the government program for Benjamin Netanyahu… (Former Prime Minister of Israel). Alex goes on to say who could have done this? Bulow says it was not the CIA and Alex jumps in saying your talking about black ops. Then Alex says we know only a MAJOR STATE could have carried this out. Andreas says it must have been done from high up and it had to be done by a few people. Alex says would you say 100-200, AVB says less, Alex asks, “50 people?” And AVB says less. Maybe Alex can not say it was the Zionists on the air. But he sure was hinting at it.

Well I have just been telling you who the Neocons who wrote PNAC and were embedded in the DOD were. They are the Zionist cabal. Their aim is to increase the wealth and power of the MIC and the flag ship of the MIC right now is Israel.

Bush and his merry band of sadistic Zionists would like to blame shift the responsibility of the WMDs myths to the CIA. Well as evil and corrupt as the CIA is, it is not that sloppy. Bush did not just get “mistaken intelligence” or make “miscalculations” he explicitly asked for fabrications.

Here is the concrete proof that they lied. One of Bush’s claims about Iraq was that Saddam was trying to acquire yellow-cake uranium from Africa. This rhetoric was further laced in fear by Neo-condelsleeza Rice saying we could not let the smoking gun be a mushroom cloud. What outrageous audacity, (they are even re-using the same fear-mongering excuses to attack Iran) they were dead wrong as George Tenet (head of the CIA at the time of 911) would later have to admit.

Well the document that Bush based this claim on was a fake! How do we know? Because the signature on it was forged! How do we know? Because the forgers put down the wrong person’s name! The Foreign minister from Niger, the country they were claiming Saddam was gathering uranium from, who supposedly signed it had been out of power since 1989! Allele Elhadj Habibou was not in power at the time of the supposed signature. Look here I have the primary documents and a summary.

In a letter from the President of Niger a reference is made to the constitution of May 12, 1965 — but the constitution is dated August 9, 1999;

Another letter purports to be signed by Niger’s foreign minister, but bears the signature of Allele Elhadj Habibou, the minister between 1988-89;

An obsolete letterhead is used, including the wrong symbol for the presidency, and references to state bodies such as the Supreme Military Council and the Council for National Reconciliation are incompatible with the letter’s date;

It wasn’t until just before the war began that Mohamed El Baradei, IAEA director-general, told the UN Security Council on March 7 that his team and ‘outside experts’, had worked out that ‘ these documents … are in fact not authentic’.

Now that must be embarrassing. Be nice if the mainstream media would report that. Now are you ready to get pulled out of the rabbit hole some more? I will come back to just who forged these documents. (Ahmad Chalabi , Francis Brookes, Dewey Clarridge, and Michael Ledeen. ) First let’s see how they got into the president’s hands. Bush said, these well known false claims, as if they were true in his State of the Union Address. It has now been called is infamous 16 words, which he could be impeached for if we had an actual opposition party.

The disinformation was stove piped straight to Cheney/Bush by a little known shadow government called the OSP: the Office of Special Plans, headed under Cheney and Rumsfeld and a pack of Zionists underlings, yes the same ones who co-authored PNAC’s papers and the Clean Break for Israel paper.

In an attempt to shut up people who tried to tell the public that the uranium claim was a lie, and as a means to prevent the CIA from catching who forged the documents, and as a means to once again undermine the US’s ability to track nuclear weapons thus creating wiggle room to lie about Iran, a clandestine CIA agent and her front company BJA was uncovered when journalists from the NY Times and CNN were purposely slipped information by Cheney’s Chief of Staff, Lewis Libby and Presidential advisor Karl Rove. To unravel all of this please go

We now have Libby admitting that Bush and Cheney authorized him to leak the information, yet another offense they could both be impeached for were we to have a functional Republic. Remember that Libby was also a co-author of PNAC and worked with Wolfowitz under Cheney in Bush the first’s presidency. Interesting isn’t it?

Don’t worry it gets worse. Notice that this is something that Richard Perle got in trouble for in the past. Perle has resigned from his position in the Department of Defense. He did so just after AIPAC’s headquarters was physically raided by the FBI, how coincidental. What is AIPAC? Well AIPAC would be Israel’s largest lobby. (In reality it is a Zionist lobby and it does not benefit Israel per-se, it benefits the MIC). A man working for Perle in the DOD named Larry Franklin has gotten sentenced to 12 years in jail for passing off top secret documents to AIPAC who in turn gave them to the Israeli government through the Israeli embassy in DC. Go read about that scandal here

So Israel has been caught spying on the US again what is new other than the fact that a foreign government can get caught spying in the US in a time of war and the Media will not report it. Just imagine if it had been Iranian spies instead of Jews, and how big this story would be. Also imagine that were attacking Iran’s enemies and were following a war plan written off of Iranian policy papers and a disproportionate number of the authors were all Iranian Americans who were still in government and had dual citizenship to Iran. Ha ha not a chance but you see Israel can get away with it because Israel is a cash cow for the Military-Industrial-Complex.

Corporations have obviously profiteered from the wars, that should be clear to captain obvious. But did they write, implement, and use deception to start this war or was that the Zionists? Who got caught spying on the US, Halliburton or Israel? Israel that is who. The profiteering is a by product of the war as in any war. They are all in bed together because of overlapping interests between the military related corporations and the Zionists. Zionism which allows a standing army to invade Palestine in order to protect illegal racial colonies of religious fanatics who think GOD gave them the land they bulldozed and shot children for in order to steal it…

However, just how the Hell do they get away with it? Well they are free from any and all criticism because they play the two cards which an over-socialized liberal can not see through. They play the race card and the religion card, a double whammy. If you say the J word it is over, even if Israel has an illegal military occupation and sets up racially segregated colonies into Palestine, kills kids, knocks down homes of civilians and attacks them with a military and runs a brutal police state which is causing a backlash of terrorism on Israeli people. The Zionists are the real racist, engaging in ethnic cleansing in the name of defense and calling any opposition terrorists. They are creating terrorism by engaging in it themselves.

Video link Israel can do ANYTHING and the press will not mention. But then again just who owns our press and our banks?…

One of the arguments that people express or at least struggle with, who do not believe 911 was an inside job, is the question of the media. They cannot believe that no one in the media would talk about it. Well Anyone who knows jack about the Israeli Palestine conflict knows how much the US media, lies, distorts, and omits information in order to push the Zionists’ aims.

This site has this video up in the “best of section,” I highly recommend seeing

“Peace Propaganda and the Promised Land” to learn more about the relationships between Israel and the US media. Visit our video section and watch all those films. For the record Google has reset this counter on this video many times. It was number 31 with millions views now down to 700,000 plus. I also recommend the film Occupation 101

What people need to realize is what is behind the Media.


Well the major networks are all owned by different corporations.
These corporations have vested interest in the largest umbrella corporation on earth, the Military industrial complex, or one might say the industries involved in weapons manufacturing, reconstruction, energy, ect everything that has a pay check tied to the allocation of money to the military. Corporations have “Boards of Directors.” However the same people may serve on multiple “Board of Directors” for different corporations, and they do as I will explain.

For Example CBS is owned by Viacom so is MTV, VH1, and Nickelodeon. It’s not just the news but the sitcoms and such as well that are part of the propaganda. Viacom is owned by Sumner Redstone. (originally Murray Rothstein) CNN is owned by AOl-TimeWarner. Warner Brothers is owned by Gerald Levin who is also part of the Trilateral commission. ABC is owned by Disney. Disney (at the time of 911 and the start of the war) was run by Michael Eisner. Fox is owned by the Rupert Murdoch News Corporation. MSNBC is obviously influenced by Microsoft who holds 18% of the company but it was founded by none other than the corporate welfare sucking G.E. (who is deeply invested in the Israeli occupation). GE Universal is run by Edgar Bronfman, Jr the son of Edgar Bronfman president of the World Jewish Congress.

The British press is not much better. Have a look at them reporting Building 7 fell while we can all see it clearly still standing
behind the reporter’s head.

Remember that it was also the BBC that copied a college student’s paper from California and tried to pass it off as intel on Saddam’s infrastructure. BBC copied a 12 year paper from a college student and said it was solid evidence on Saddam.
Members of the Board of Directors of these corporations sit on the BOD of the weapons manufactures and mega companies like Texaco, Chevron, Boeing, Lockheed, Citigroup, Rockwell Automation, Chase, Worldcom, JP Morgan, Halliburton etc.

Some are even in the government. For Example Chevron/Texaco merged with Unocal who got the largest and first no-bid contracts from Afghanistan. The Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice, was on the Board of Directors for Chevron/Texaco. They even named an oil tanker after her.

Lets look at some of this mess.

John H. Biggs sits on the board of directors for both Boeing and JP Morgan & Chase. How nice to direct both a company and two banks. John E. Bryson is on the BOD with Boeing and also He is a director of The Walt Disney Company, who owns ABC. Linda Z. Cook the CEO of Shell is also on the BOD of Boeing. [more on boeing here disgusting how interwoven they all are isn’t it?]

Lockheed is comprised of mainly ex-military and x-government employees in the defense industry. They got caught in the 70s financing the right-wing party the LDP in Japan who has open connections to the Yakuza the Mafia times 100. Check out the Kodama Lackheed incident. (“Rokkeido jiken”) They paid this mobster Kodama of the Kanto-kai and ties to the Yamaguchi-gume Yakuza wing (the largest one) 2 million in 1976 dollars to swing contracts for Lockheed. Lockheed’s president at the time Carl Kotchian was forced to report in detail the company’s long history secret payments to Kodama. It’s a well known scandal in Japan as it was so disgraceful that 1) the Japanese government is full of mafia and 2) they got money from the very same company that built the planes that dropped the atomic bombs on Japan.
more here This was Japan’s Watergate. But you won’t hear about it in any standard history text books. Lockheed was busted bribing the Prime minister (Kakuei Tanaka) both the ministries of transportation and industry as well as setting up a $50,000 kickback to the president of All Nippon Airways for each plane sold. -*

Dick (45 million in Halliburton) Cheney’s wife was on the BOD of Lockheed until 2001! Unbelievable, and Lockheed for the past 7 years in a row has gotten the largest government contracts normally tens of billions. Here is a list from 2005 back to 2000. As you can see Boeing is in second every year.

Top 20 Defense contracts for 2005

1 Lockheed Martin Corp. $20 billion
2 Boeing Co. 18.8 billion
3 Northrop Grumman Corp. 13.7 billion
4 General Dynamics Corp. 11.1 billion
5 Raytheon Co. 9.4 billion
6 Halliburton Co. 5.9 billion
7 United Technologies Corp. 4.9 billion
8 L-3 Communications Holdings 4.8 billion
9 Carlyle Group 2.7 billion
10 SAIC 2.7 billion
11 BAE Systems 2.6 billion
12 General Electric Co. 2.5 billion
13 Computer Sciences Corp. 2.4 billion
14 Humana Inc. 2.2 billion
15 Textron Inc. 2.1 billion
16 Occupational Health Services 2 billion
17 ITT Industries 1.9 billion
18 Triwest Healthcare Alliance Co. 1.8 billion
19 URS Corp. 1.5 Billion
20 Bechtel Group Inc. 1.5 billion

Top 20 defense contracts for 2004

Lockheed Martin Corporation $20,690,912,117
The Boeing Company $17,066,412,718
Northrup Grumman Corporation $11,894,090,277
General Dynamics Corporation $9,563,280,236
Raytheon Company $8,472,813,918
Halliburton Company $7,996,793,706
United Technologies Corporation $5,056,937,646
Science Applications International $2,450,781,108
Computer Sciences Corporation $2,390,806,128
Humana, INC $2,372,078,226
L-3 Communications Holding, INC $2,260,292,852
BAE Systems PLC $2,192,647,377
Health Net, INC $1,899,824,940
General Electric Company, INC $1,822,720,199
Bechtel Group, INC $1,742,470,267
Bell Boeing Joint Program $1,539,815,440
ITT Industries, INC $1,539,742,075
Electronic Data Systems Corp $1,538,272,307
Honeywell International, INC $1,462,914,723
Carlyle Group $1,442,680,416

Top 10 defense contracts in 2002 before the Iraq war.

1 Lockheed Martin Corp. $17.0 billion
2 Boeing Co. $16.6 billion
3 Northrop Grumman Corp. $8.7 billion
4 Raytheon Co. $7.0 billion
5 General Dynamics Corp. $7.0 billion
6 United Technologies Corp. $3.6 billion
7 Science Applications International Corp. $2.1 billion
8 TRW Inc. $2.0 billion
9 Health Net, Inc. $1.7 billion
10 L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc. $1.7 billion

As you can See every Year Lockheen Martain is at the top by a large gap followed by Boeing and Northrop Grumman Corporation. Notice that Carlyle and General Electric and Halliburton are in there as well. We are giving them BILLIONS, actually tens of Billions Almost as much as what Churches send to Israel. Please now read this

I got these figures from their own fricking websites. Go ahead and comb them with a fine tooth comb. These are not secrets. This is right out in the open. These are not secret societies, these are companies in the MIC who profiteer from war and who own our mass media.

Lets look at number 3 Northrop Grumman Corp.

They also have a hand in glove relationship with the government. They have been in the government.

Vic Fazio
Senior Advisor at Northrop

“Vic Fazio served as a Member of Congress for 20 years representing California’s third congressional district. During that time, he served as a member of the Armed Services, Budget and Ethics Committees and was a member of the House Appropriations Committee where he served as Subcommittee Chair or ranking member for 18 years


Kevin Sharner and Philip Frost both on the BOD at Northrop are or have been on the BOD of major Pharmaceutical companies.

It just gets more nasty the more you look

I will let you look up the rest on your own. Just grab some of the names from these list and look at their BODs. Needless to say they are all one happy corporate killing family. Nothing makes them more money than warfare. And nothing is currently a larger cash cow than the Zionist occupation of Palestine which also has the financing of super right wing Christian churches who get the benefit of air time from the networks for preaching the message that is best for the warmongers and investing their money into their stocks. More on that whole mess and the iron triangle etc here

Multi-national corporations run our press and government. They tie back to the privately owned central banks. long story short the MSM is full of shit.

More on the MIC, Defense spending

Our senate voted on the new bill for Defense spending 100 for and 0 against it. That’s 100% for giving more money to the MIC and ZERO opposition. Some interesting parts I found:

(Sec. 8024) Authorizes DOD to incur obligations of up to $350 million for DOD military compensation, construction projects, and supplies and services in anticipation of receipts of contributions from the government of Kuwait. –source

(Sec. 8082) Earmarks specified RDT&E funds for producing Arrow missile components in the United States and Arrow missile components and missiles in Israel to meet Israel’s defense requirements.source

There was this Amendment, but it got rejected.

S.AMDT.4875 to H.R.5631 To increase by $200,000,000 the amount appropriated or otherwise made available by title IX for the purpose of supplying needed humanitarian assistance to the innocent Lebanese and Israeli civilians who have been affected by the hostilities between Hezbollah and the Government of Israel.

8/3/2006 Amendment SA 4875 ruled out of order by the chair –source click Amendments and go to the very bottom of the page.

They can spend money to build missile but not to help civilians wounded or left homeless by missiles Israel used on a civilian population in Lebanon. The Amendment said Israeli and Lebanese civilians the problem being Lebanon had 2.5 billion damages and Israel specifically targeted civilian areas where as Hezbollah didn’t.

And nothing is covered with more of a bias than the occupation of Palestine. THE KEY ISSUE. Watch a long film on that here or a short film

911 was a spring board for these on going wars. You already know why the press wont touch it. So WHO do you think took part in 911???

It is crucial to understand how the media is a mouth piece for the MIC and that the government serves as a medium for them to grant our money via tax collection and inflation (bonds from the bank) to themselves with non-bid contracts coupled with insider trading, and countless pork. Every “reconstruction” contract in Iraq came with a shadow contract for some private security firm to protect it. These projects are worth billions. The US has spent 950 Billion in Iraq, together with the billions given to Israel that is a trillion dollars spent on death.


Let’s jump back to Iraq. The media has not covered crucial aspect of the war in Iraq either. The televised press still has not mentioned AIPAC’s spy ring yet they have reported outright lies about Iraq and Iran. There has also been no mention of the Niger Forgeries or the deeper aspects of the Plame affair that being why Bush ordered her ousted and how did Jeff Gannon (male hooker working for a fake news agency) make reference to internal government memos about it?! Where is the US press that could simply explain in one sentence that the wall Israel is building is not even on their boarder but cuts into Palestine? Where was the US’s coverage of the mk77 dropped all over Fallujah? How about the obvious theater like production of the toppling of the Saddam statue in Iraq that British press could report in the same language and yet the Majority of Americans remain blissfully in the dark about it. There have been so many lies, not just about war….

But at this point with carriers in place and the surge in place and the Democrats giving Bush 659 billion for the next war and another 100 billion for the current ones, I would settle on preventing war with Iran rather than the ambitious goal of withdrawing from Iraq.

———————————————————————————– Rewind let’s look at 911 itself.

The HijackersI have to talk about the hijackers for a minute. I cross referenced reports from the FBI’s own account of the 19 alleged hijackers and a report from Mike Rivero on the living hijackers with a piece on the Israeli spy ring by Justin Raimondo. As it turns out at least 7 hijackers are still alive and were victims of identity theft (8 if you include Atta which I do as I will explain) now I would increase that number to ten. After 911 the official story from ABCNNBCBS FOX was that hijackers were in cells in Florida and New Jersey. Now it came out early by Raimondo and many researchers that Israeli agents were living next door to the said hijackers in Florida including the supposed ring leader Mohamed Atta. (who apparently can teleport). It is also know that the Mossad agents busted in a white van in New York worked for a Mossad front Urban Moving Systems which was raided by police who took more than 12 computer hard drives.

Well the Mossad front (whose own fled back to Israel) was located in Weehawken New Jersey just across the water from NYC. At least three of the said Hijackers in 911 lived in Fort Lee New Jersey, Salem Alhazmi, his older brother Nawaf and Hani Hanjour. Fort Lee NJ is less than 3 miles from the Weehawken address. Hani Hanjour was supposed to be the pilot who crashed flight 77 into the pentagon. Here is where it drops down to a Scooby Doo level detection story. Salem Alhazmi was said to have shared a room with Hanjour in Fort Lee. Early on it was reported by the MSM that Salem was caught on security camera footage at Dullas airport (guess who ran security there) as he was stopped after setting off a metal detector and searched. That is VERY interesting because Salem Alhazmi is still alive and works in Saudi Arabia. We know for a fact that he is alive the BBC interviewed him and it was reported in British papers. He said his passport and identity had been stolen 3 year prior when he was in Egypt further more the man has never even been the the United States! So just who was rooming with Hanjour and who was on the film at Dullas? It doesn’t make since. And if Hanjour’s roommate was a frame why shouldn’t believe that evidence trail left to finger Hanjour was not also a frame as well as Salem’s brother Nawaf? That would make it 10 of the 19 hijackers who could not have been part of 911. However the Israeli Mossad was working just a couple miles away and in Florida it was not even that far. So who is fond of stealing passports? The Mossad. I ask you to recall the story of Zev Brakan. Who worked next to the hijacker cells in NJ and FL? The Mossad. Who sent the anthrax letters and from where? They came from New Jersey and we know at least who acquired the Anthrax if not who mailed it, a Zionist American Philip Zack who tried to frame an Egyptian. Funny Atta was also Egyptian. The USS Liberty attack was initially blamed on Egypt. The Lavon affair was blamed on Egypt. And the FBI tried to frame an Egyptian for the first WTC bombing but he recorded their conversation telling him he was only part of a drill. Wow sounds like 7/7 doesn’t it. For the record I predicted 7/7 three days prior and mysteriously my websites were deleted.

So we have over 200 Israelis busted in a “Art Student” spy ring and 12 computers, a Mossad celebration busted up by police on 911, who were filming the whole thing. A group of Zionist move in quickly with the pre-written Patriot Act and the creation of the department of Homeland Security, PNAC members on the 911 commission, a dual citizen cabal in the DoD that lied us into war and all this transparent mythology about the 19 hijackers. One might ask why did the Mossad frame people who were alive and why didn’t they at least try to kill all of them before their pasties turned up alive. Ha they didn’t even worry about it. Israel enjoys total immunity from the US media and they know it. Just look at this recent attack on a “nuclear” site in Syria which didn’t even exist. The press is not going to say anything. Israel already build racial colonies in Palestine and they get away with that. They murdered Hariri as I pointed out in ironclad fashion in the Lebanon documentary and they got away with that. They definitely knowingly attacked an American ship the USS Liberty and they got away with that. Its been 40 years since then and the truth can’t make it past websites and foreign media. It is a nightmare.

What Really Happened? Super Zionist Dov Zakheim whose company investigated the first WTC bombing, acquired Boeing planes and outfitted them with remote control capacity. The so called hijackers were never on those planes. The Israeli Mossad which had a massive spy ring as well as gathered blackmail from phone taps on politicians were the ones who created the smoke screen and posed as Arab terrorist for those they had stolen identities from. They went out of their way to leave a trail to their list of 19 and even went to flight schools posing as their patsies, that is why they lived next door to where the patsies were supposed to be. As soon as 911 happened the media read its prepared package. The pre-written Patriot Act and Homeland security branch were created by Zionists and run by Zionists. The Anthrax letters were mail and blamed on Araba and then falsely linked to Saddam. The attack itself was blamed on Bin Laden who died in December that year. The Zionist moles in the media hyped up each PNAC talking point like it was true and backed by evidence. The US went to war with Iraq. Their next plan was Lebanon and then Syria according to the Clean Break Paper but it can not be done without facing Iran. The Hariri murder was a false flag blamed on Syria then changed to Palestine and as a result Syria pulled its troops out of Lebanon from the pressure. After the Syrians were removed Israel thought they could invade and they did but they were repelled by Hezbollah. Next on the agenda is attacking Iran and the excuse as Libby wrote to Miller is Iran’s non-existent nuclear weapons program.

The ATTA story is a smoking gun.
Answering some common questions.

Here is a question you may have asked yourself. If 911 was an inside job (and I believe it was) then why was there so much prior knowledge of the attacks? Granted it was ignored, but how could there be intelligence of an Al Qaeda ring in the US and all those pilots going to flight schools and the warning about Bin Laden wanted to attack America if the said hijackers didn’t do it (which is evident by some of them still being alive) ?

Why risk them getting busted if they were patsies? Since the hijackers didn’t do it how was there any evidence of them planning an attack that they didn’t do and obviously didn’t even know about considering they were going to get the blame? Furthermore if the government really did 911 then why leak information about your own patsies and look like incompetent fools when the warnings were ignored?

The prior knowledge arguments have evidence. They do two things. They make the Bush administration look incompetent for not acting on supplied information but it also looks like the attacks could have been prevented had Bush and co only read the memos they were being given. What that does is make it appear like the attack was done by Arab terrorists. The Democrats naturally jumped all over this chance to make Republicans look bad yet still blame 911 on Arab terrorists.

Someone was dropping hints and information to imply that the terrorists were Arabs and mainly from Saudi Arabia. Why did they frame Saudi Arabia if it was a frame and they were patsies then why not use at least one Iraqi after all that is who they wanted to attack and did attack after 911. Why Saudi Arabia?

The answer is clear when you understand who really carried out 911. The Israeli Mossad, their Neocon moles and the blackmail controlled shills. So let’s put some facts together. Someone obviously wanted to pin the 911 terrorists attacks on Muslim Arabs.

One of the most laughable parts of the 911 story was the FBI finding Atta’s unburned passport two blocks away from the twin towers. What a crock. Atta’s pass port had been reported stolen in 1999 magically that missing and stolen pas port is the same one that was found at ground zero. Geee someone must have put it there for the FBI to find in order to implicate Muslim Arab terrorists.

Who could that be? Who got caught on 911 in a white van that had traces of explosives in it and worked for a moving company which turned out to be a front for the Israeli Mossad? (Note that the address of this front was raided by police and the evidence linking Israel to 911 is Classified. 5 Israeli agents got caught and the first thing out of their mouths was

“We are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are your problem.”

Gosh an English speaking x-military explosives expert cheering and taking pictures of the WTC burning towers in NY on 911 who worked for a fake moving company in the Mossad driving a van that had a hit with bomb sniffing dogs and over 4 thousand dollars stuffed in a sock is nothing to be concerned about. Sivan Kurzberg could still say with a straight face. “It wasn’t me, blame the Palestinians.”

Shortly after 911 we had two different Anthrax letters trying to blame 911 on the Arabs. One read

“You cannot stop us. We have this anthrax. You die now. Are you afraid? Death to America. Death to Israel. Allah is great.”

and the other read

This is next. Take Penacilin now. Death to America. Death to Israel. Allah is great.”

Death to America and Death to Israel. Gee, I wonder who really wrote it? Might it be Israel?

Rudi Dekkers was Atta’s or someone pretending to be Atta’s flight instructor in Florida. Note that we know the The Israeli Mossad was living next door to Atta in Florida (supposedly monitoring him).

Now Rudi Dekkers discovered that Atta could not speak German. Mohamed Atta lived in Hamburg Germany yet suddenly he must have forgotten how to speak German. Dekkers a Dutch citizen tried to converse with Atta who stared at him and had to ignore him eventually leaving for Boston.

This is eerily similar to the way in which Zacharias Moussaoui (the so-called “20th hijacker”) became “belligerent” when his Minnesota flight instructor tried to speak to him in French (his first language), at the beginning of that course. The Minnesota Star Tribune reported on December 21, 2001: also here

“The real Atta would have been able to respond to his instructor’s German small talk and the real Moussaoui would have been able to respond to his instructor’s French small talk.” quoted from here

Well SOMEBODY was trying to create information about Arab Hijackers training for 911. SOMEBODY was living next to their partner Atta framer. No wonder Atta was seen so many times on the casino ships with Jack Abramoff. He was not Atta he was the Mossad’s own boy. They killed the real Atta.

SOMEBODY left his passport at ground zero and then somebody wrote letters for the anthrax attacks steering Americas rage onto Israel’s enemies.

Back to the Saudi question. So why there? To understand this one would have to be aware of the foiled Mossad plot in Mexico. To be brief the oill rich Mexico was being set up to ally with the US by way of another false flag operation. But the plot was foiled and the Israelis busted with Hand grenades and TNT. I really encourage you to get my book Welcome to the USSA. Cut oil off from the Sauds…. Blame the Anthrax attacks on an Egyptian… invent false Al Qaeda connections with Iraq… say Osama is in Afghanistan…. cook up lies about Iran having nukes or making people wear yellow stars… Someone is not at war with terrorists but with Israel’s enemies. We KNOW they lied about Iraq. I assure you Bin Laden is already dead. And We know they are lying about 911. Much of the pay off for this has been done through SAIC and North Star PR. They didn’t pay for their black ops directly they just sent truckloads of cash to Iraq and then “lost” it.

SAIC has been a bit of a buzzword lately and a lot of disinfo has been said about it. This is a Huge tangent but if you want to really know about SAIC then go to this link SAIC. Or read this Washington’s Billion Dollar Shadow this Billions over Baghdad. and listen to this Mp3.

People will say that Iraq is such a failure and that our government could not possibly be clever enough to pull off a 911. Iraq is a “failure” by design. Is Iraq really a failure? From the perspective of having the interests of the American people at hand or the people of Iraq then yes Iraq is a tremendous failure. From the perspective of the interest of the Neoconservatives Iraq is exactly what they wanted. We know this because they wrote about it before they created the lies and false flag attack shamelessly connected to more of their lies which brought us in there. It doesn’t take a great deal of compotence to mess up a country. It’s pretty easy to pull off a goal in a volitile region when your goal is to simply wreck everything.

Israeli firster Douglas Feith who worked under Perle in the DOD devised a plan with Rumsfeld which was put into practice by our despot in Iraq Paul Bremer. Bremer was an aid to Kissinger. The Bremer plan (actually created by Feith) was a step by step path to ruin and chaos for Iraq. Keep in mind that the goal of the Neoconservatives was never to bring stability to Iraq it was to privatize the assets, divide it up into 3 cantons and cause enough hell to warrant permanent military bases and constant war profiteering for Neocon firms in the MIC.

Feith and Bremer implemented the “de-baathificatoin” of Iraq. If you remember the early rhetoric of the MSM on the war was that they would meet us in the streets with flowers and then they staged that silly statue toppling with Ahmad Chalabi personally caught in two photos. After that the resistance, “insurgency” was said to be “dead-enders” “Saddam loyalists” and “Baathists.

They tried to link the Iraqi resistance to Saddam when the Iraqi people had made it clear that it had nothing to do with Saddam, they didn’t like him either. They fought the army because we destroyed their country physically, cut off power and water and murdered their children…

So what was the genius thing that Bremer did right from his start in Iraq? Order 1 was to fire thousands of teachers, nurses, doctors, and state workers simply for being of the wrong political persuasion. Next came the real whopper. Order 2 was to disband the Iraqi military! 400,000 military men were forcibly released without pensions onto the streets of Iraq. So hundreds of thousands of trained Iraqis were fired and left to the streets where oh so conveniently they had access to about a million tons of weapons in munitions located in unguarded depots around the country. Weapons and explosives were just “vanishing.” And they continue to do so.

And as the Daily Show jokes, it is not just missing arms it is oil and money as well. Stewart jokes of “profound incompetence” but it is actually by design.

Throw on top of this the infamous stories about false flag operations in Iraq carried out by American, British, and Israeli forces to further aggravate violence between religious factions. British troops in Basra were caught wearing wigs and driving with explosives in their vehicle. When the Iraqi police arrested them the British army rammed down the wall of the police station to get them out. Must have been desperate to get them back.

The factual fighting was exacerbated by Bremer who did not allow direct elections. He creates an advisory council which he had total veto power over and allowed Iraqis to chose between previously approved candidates. All of that purple finger crap was a farce the Iraqi people were voting between In essence they could only choose between those already chosen. To make matters worse many Sunnis groups were banned from participation and Shiite followers of Al-Sadar were also banned. When these groups were banned and the INC lackies elected by the default of there being no other options they factions turned to violence. And of course groups fought it out in cycles of revenge we now know were encouraged perhaps outright cause by occupation forces doing things like shooting up weddings and bombing Mosques.

Skipping down to Order number 39

“…Order 39, which allowed foreign companies to own 100 percent of Iraqi assets outside of the natural-resource sector. Even better, investors could take 100 percent of the profits they made in Iraq outside of the country; they would not be required to reinvest and they would not be taxed. Under Order 39, they could sign leases and contracts that would last for forty years.”

-p68 Blackwater

Iraq’s assets were being thrown to the wolves and the oil industry went straight into “privatization” in about a fair a manner as the “privatization” of Russia. Order 40 allowed the Foreign banks in to gobble up what remained.

This disaster in Iraq is exactly what the Neocons planned for and wanted. Bush can take the heat because he is just a useful idiot who believes he is doing the work of god. This war was not about oil, that was a very small reason. The war is about control, over any and all economic and military rivals. The war was given to us by the MIC heads who are the same people who control the massive conflict generator and money maker for the arms industry that is Likud Israel.

For a tiny fraction of the cost of the war we could have bought the oil. That’s not the interest though. The war costs are tied up in the MIC. The military hardware the destruction of cities and the contracts to rebuild all that infrastructure, the military bases, the prisons, this is all money for them and it is a launching pad into their neighbors like Iran. This is about Greater Israel. Listen here and also here and here

Dividing Iraq up in to sections and fostering religious in-fighting is not a new plan. It is an old ISRAELI plan from Oden Yinon back in 1982. “Iraq, rich in oil on the one hand and internally torn on the other, is guaranteed as a candidate for Israel’s targets. Its dissolution is even more important for us than that of Syria. Iraq is stronger than Syria. In the short run it is Iraqi power which constitutes the greatest threat to Israel. An Iraqi-Iranian war will tear Iraq apart and cause its downfall at home even before it is able to organize a struggle on a wide front against us. Every kind of inter-Arab confrontation will assist us in the short run and will shorten the way to the more important aim of breaking up Iraq into denominations as in Syria and in Lebanon. In Iraq, a division into provinces along ethnic/religious lines as in Syria during Ottoman times is possible. So, three (or more) states will exist around the three major cities: Basra, Baghdad and Mosul, and Shi’ite areas in the south will separate from the Sunni and Kurdish north. It is possible that the present Iranian-Iraqi confrontation will deepen this polarization”-A Strategy for Israel from 1982 by Oded YinonAmericans are dying for Israel. What do we get in return? Nothing but more demands. Israel continues to take 10-15 million dollars a day from America. And they get the money all up front in 3 Billion dollar packages that they can earn interest on.

Well Iraq and Iran had their war they fought for almost a decade. But Iraq grew up they bounced back. Two Gulf Wars Later we Americans in Iraq doing Israel’s plan. Turkey is not going to like a Kurdistan to the North on bit and Cheney knew that.

-Listen to THAT! Is Cheney being blackmailed? All the Zionists are inside his office.

The question no longer remains who did it? We know the specific names. We know who made the OSP and wrote PNAC who put the bombs in the towers and when and I gave a good theory as to why and how it was covered up by showing how the press works.


You can see from the partial list I made of government contracts and Boards of directors, how the scam works between the MIC, Media conglomerates, and the banks. They profit from lying to you. Always follow the money and the motives. And in this day and age, follow the oil too.

The first proposed oil pipeline to be opened in Iraq was set to go to Tel Aviv Israel. Here is where they planned it ten days before the end of the war. And here is where they planned setting up another oil pipeline to Israel, this one going to Haifa. And they now pump oil from Mosul to Hiafa Golly gee, that is interesting why was all the oil planned to go to Israel?
Oh it gets worse. The US sends oil to Israel from Iraq then buys it from Israel.

One of Israel’s largest oil marketing firms has won a multi-million dollar tender to supply fuel to US troops in Iraq. According to a report, the tender awarded to Sonol gasoline company, along with its foreign partner Morgantown International, is valued at $70-80 million. The company is expected to supply the US forces with 25 million litres of fuel each month. The tender was issued by the US-based KDR Company, a subsidiary of Halliburton, which has been entrusted with the majority of US military contracts in Iraq


Israel takes US aid and buys oil from Iraq at 20% less than the cost it gets it from Russia and then sells it to the US and is also awarded contracts by the US government.

Well Israel did have an oil problem.

According to the Energy Information Administration (EIA), a statistical agency of the US Department of Energy, Israel produces almost no oil and imports nearly all its oil needs (around 237,000 barrels a day in 2002). Traditionally, major oil import sources have included Egypt, the North Sea, West Africa and Mexico
Information provided by the EIA states that in April 2003, there was some discussion of “reopening” the old oil pipeline from Mosul in Northern Iraq to the Israeli port of Haifa on its northern Mediterranean coast.

The line, which was built in the 1930s, carried 100,000 barrels a day at its peak, but has been closed since Israel’s establishment in 1948.

The reopening of this pipeline is, on the other hand, reported as being able to “solve Israel’s energy crisis at a stroke”.


But that is not all. They took oil from Kirkuk where 40% of Iraq’s oil is and Hafar al Batin, Al Basrah (Basara) and Mosul too. Here is a map of where Iraq’s oil is going.

It’s a war for oil the left shouts. “No blood for oil” they say. Yeh that’s true, ‘no blood for oil’ going to Israel, while our own gas prices rise.

The Neocons have failed many things because of hubris, they failed in Lebanon, they are failing in Iraq. They would like nothing more than to Balkanize Iraq into three sections with a Kurdistan in the North but instead they just have a messy low impact guerilla civil war. The cheers and flowers never came despite the massive propaganda.

Now 911. Back in Feb 2001 the US and UK attacked Iraq with much public Backlash. Bush bombed Baghdad just two weeks after being sworn in to office. He tried to start PNAC’s plan then but the public was not having it. They needed that New Pearl Harbor event that PNAC said would be necessary.

They rigged it with the Mossad’s help on 911.
here is how we know

Note the 5 dancing Israelis who had bomb sniffing dogs reacting to their van and who worked for a Mossad front, a fake moving company in NJ whose owner skipped town right after 911 and fled to Israel. Note that they all failed polygraph tests and were all x-military and oh geee explosive experts.

Note the following bogus Anthrax attacks which said “DEATH TO AMERICA DEATH TO ISRAEL” This was a huge story for a few day, long enough to pass the PATRIOT Act and then simultaneously it disappeared from all the News Networks over night. What a media coincidence huh? Putting it all together is easy. If 911 was an inside job and not the work of Al Qaeda (but patsies) then the anthrax didn’t come from Al Qaeda either. I wonder who sent it? I wonder where it came from? They basically named themselves in the classic Owellian double speak. America and Israel.

These things are not mentioned in 911 video alt radio and of course not on TV. Zionism is THE most sacred subject in the US. One mention of it and you are automatically and Anti-Semite. Well it is time to grow some balls and start talking about the Elephant in the room. Neocons from Israel and America started these wars and carried out 911. That’s the real 911 Truth.

New Information 100% proof Atta had a double

…as more than half the CFRs and PNAC authors are Jewish Zionist. The reason being Jewish matters is that for some kooky reason just by having that religion (which is really an ethnicity in disguise,) one can have dual citizenship to Israel. Oh Zionism is not a faith, (not that I think religions are too grand to begin with) Zionism is one version of one prophecy of one brand of one religion. If “legal Jewishness” was a religion and not a race then why the concept of bloodlines? You have to prove you are “Jewish” by ancestry to pass and that allows one to have dual citizenship with another country and government, Israel. Apparently this “religion” is genetically inherited much like a race. Thus the Zionists put the interests of a foreign government above the US. Also the MIC including Zionism gets the multi-billion dollar investments from Christian Churches.

The UN are puppets to the Banks which are also Zionist run and owned and have been since the days of the Rothchilds. The Veto Power rest with the colonial powers. However the “third” world is rising up. The UN can slap resolutions on Israel which Israel will openly defy all day. If America doesn’t want to enforce something then it is basically nothing but paper.

Zionists who have a hand in glove relationship with tax free multi-billion dollar churches, use that wealth to position themselves into creating new conflicts which are used to milk in more money for the corporations under the MIC’s umbrella. They are acting as middlemen managing the money of stock holders through third party factions who practice insider trading with a veriety of profiteering methods. ( video link I explained it here)

The ugly ‘Mega’ Zionist Ricahrd Perle (PNAC founder) buddied up with the wormy five foot two Super Zionist, Henry Kissinger who was the first choice to head up the 911 commission whose credibility is so poor that he had to decline the offer and give it to another Zionist Jew Michael Chertoff (son of a Rabbi and dual citizen with Israel), whose cousin is the editor of Popular Mechanics a BS publication that tries to debate 911 with the likes of the ‘Loose Change’ folks who don’t even mention Zionism and spout off class-C arguments like the pentagon was hit by a missile and cell phones could not work on the planes. My advice is stick to Class A arguments, Building 7, Bush saw the first plane hit, the put-options, and the Mossad being caught redhanded as well as writing policy papers stating what they wanted to do including the following wars, the Anthrax, and follow the money. (In their defense they were never trying to lay blame on anyone, but just stating what they thought was fishy about 911. Three version came out of loose change and not mentioned anything about Israel. They were aware of it to because this doc has been around since 2004 and it was sent to them) I am glad the film is so wide spread, I just wish people who saw it would dig deeper afterwards.

The defense industries and the companies under that massive umbrella corporation normally have ties to government employees. Kissinger didn’t call it insider trading, he called it ‘guaranteed speculation’. –Video

This is how the Zionists feed into the MIC. And the conflict in Israel with basically the entire Middle East is a cash cow for the military investments. It creates the demand.

These companies are not simply just American companies, most of them are multi-national with no loyalties to anyone aside from whichever government is the current medium they can use to pipe them money. And the money awarded to the companies by the State issued (aka communism, yes welcome to the USSA) contracts is not just the allocation of our tax money, the government is spending way more than that (even when military spending consist of over half our tax money!). They are borrowing money by buying bonds from the Federal Reserve, which they have to pay interest on, in order to pay for the MIC pork projects and blood for oil and ethnic cleansing campaigns. We have created a 8.5 trillion dollar national debt. The Central banks as you know are rooted back to the same Zionists who wrote the plans for foreign policy (PNAC and ISCB) and collect from the investors. The largest investor of them all is not the wealthy individuals; it’s the multi billion dollar tax free institutions more popularly known as Protestant Churches.

Here is where it gets nasty. Religion has been perverted. The Christian-crazies are the kind of Christians who get to be on TV because they promote what is profitable for the government and themselves, are bankrolling the Zionist occupation and the yummy military related conflicts/projects it creates Sane Christians don’t get to have a TV show like Pat Robertson. Obviously the corrupt churches who pocket money are the ones who are going to rise in voice and power that is a no-brainer.

These people then promote the bigotry behind the “Settlements” and their racist attitudes. They can manipulate their flocks to vote for people like G.W. as they did in 2004 largely based on prejudice towards homosexuals. Christian Zionist have a happy alliance with the Jewish Zionists. They are not just using this to make money either. They are actually backwards enough that they believe all that “temple on the mount” rhetoric.

Tied to all of this is the corporate media and the banks. See the links. Wanna know what really happened on 911 go follow the Zionist like Larry Silverstein. And no it was not satanic groups, the Vatican, or the “illuminati.” It was real people with real names.

Do me a favor link to this article. join Anti-neocons and tell your family and friends. We have articles, videos, radio shows, all own in an open forum.

Something important that has happened since the time of my 911 writing that must be addressed is the Military Commissions Act.

Get my thoughts on it here HR 6166 and SN 3930-73 and see
the Dirt I dug up on the people who proposed the bill

If they could lie about the War in Iraq and the Media would promote it and then help cover it up. Then these SAME people could be lying about 911 with the media covering it up as they cover up all things related to Israel.

We KNOW they lied about Iraq and we KNOW who made the fabrications. We KNOW what country they have dual citizenship with and which same country has been caught spying on the US (though unreported by the MSM) twice both before and after 911. We KNOW the Mossad lived next door to said hijackers and was caught filming and celebrating the WTC attacks. Connect the dots. 911, Iraq, and PNAC Where do all the Roads lead? No not the nwo/illuminati/pope/lizards it leads to ISRAEL. and ISAREL is going to start WWIII and attack Iran, Syria and Lebanon. If we don’t do something.

You know WHAT happened on 911

Now learn WHO did it and how. And it is the same people who are behind the Iraq War and the coming attack on Iran. my no budget 911 videoHere is the mp3 file on Marc Rich
Here is background on Russia
Here is the Litvinenko paper
Here is where Paul Craige Roberts agrees with me about Israel.
The whole thing is here

Think about this. If Iran was caught spying on the US (twice) would the Media ignore that? If Iran was living next door to the said hijacker or if men from Iranian intelligence were caught filming 911 like the Israelis, would the Media ignore that? As it is the Media fabricates things about Iran and ignores the real crimes of Israel.



I am so sick of having to explain away the utter nonsense that is attached to the truth about 911. Everything from Space aliens and reptilian fish people, to neo-Nazi groups have attached themselves to the 911 conspiracy. It is a classic tactic of deceivers to purposely leak disinformation which will mix truth with lies in order to discredit the truth. Don’t fall for disinformation. And don’t just follow every word someone says, people like Chomsky, Jones, Ruppert, Raimondo, Rivero and others are not always right, everyone makes goofs now and then. Help these people don’t just parrot them. The 911 movement is splintered and factionalized. Different camps passionately hold to their theories. (but a large piece is missing, a large body of evidence is being ignore) Let me give some credit where credit is due before I try to merge these theories based on the strongest information from different thinkers. I would like to merge the 911 theories and hopefully you guys will check this out yourselves and see how this accounts for the most inclusive picture. (constructive criticism welcome) We have a lot of half truths floating around about the NWO. So I thought I would clear some things up. Most of you seem to know the facts that there is a video for, but the whole picture still has not been said. So for those of you who read, let me just drop a few facts on you and you can look it up yourself. First off 911 was an inside job, bombs were in the towers, and most of you can recite the arguments for that in your sleep. Building number seven is the smoking gun on that one. The 911 commission did not even address it and the steel from the towers was quickly carted off by trucks and sold to China through Metal Managment Inc owned by the Zionist Jew Alan Ratner. Alex Jones has done a great job on covering that side of the 911 story. (The Building 7 side of the story but not the Israeli connection) This guy is a trail blazer, hell he predicted the 911 strike back in July 25th of 2001. He did not say when it would happen, but he said they would use Osama Bin Laden as a patsy and they would run air planes into the WTC. He was also the first to make a video documentary about 911. Michael Rupert of From The Wilderness had the information about the put-options and economic anomalies posted as soon as September 12th one day after the event. The question arises, “Who did it and when” was it just a faction of Neocons in our government? Or was their assistance from a foreign government? Whose interests did they have in mind? Sites like WRH and ICH have been the best in addressing this side of the story. Let’s look at the History of PNAC and combine that knowledge with the recent trials of AIPAC the Niger Gate (the Libby trial) and the pulled Fox News Report of the Israeli spy ring and the infamous 5 dancing Israelis. One pioneer who has been all over this angle from the beginning and has had up to date information on the ensuing trial is this guy, Justin Raimondo of See the Israeli Art Students section. Justin wrote a book Terror Enigma: 9/11 And the Israeli Connection that will tell you more than you want to know about it. It is a short book but well worth the buy. I propose that 911 was an inside job carried out by Neocons moles in the US government who work for the interest a foreign government(Israel) or rather what that government serves which is the international bankers and the military industrial complex. And it is not in the interests of Israel or America. Israel is a cashcow for the MIC. 911 and the resulting wars were done in the interest of the Israeli Lobby which is backed by the age old method of profiteering by Christian fanatics and Straussian globalists. Israel is waist deep in 911 and Evagelism is waist deep in Israel. Ask yourself, if it was an inside job, then where did the anthrax letters come from after 911 if not from the same cabal that orchestrated it? And why did the letters read “DEATH TO AMERICA DEATH TO ISRAEL”? Was this an attempt to link America’s enemies with Israel’s? Israel was caugh in a false flag opperations before where they tried to blame Arab patsies. Check out the Lavon Affair. When were the bombs put in the towers? Ask yourself that. Then who was caught working for a fake moving company (a front for the Mossad)in New Jersey after they were spotted dancing and taking pictures of themselves smiling with the backdrop of the burning towers? What same moving company was in the WTC towers when the power was cut off for days prior to 911? Oh yes the power to the WTC was cut off prior to 911 and the security cameras were down. (think Al Qaeda did that?)

According to Scott Forbes, a senior database administrator for Fiduciary Trust, Inc. – a high-net investment bank which was later acquired by Franklin Templeton – this is precisely what took place. Forbes, who was hired by Fiduciary in 1999 and is now stationed at a U.K. branch office, was working on the weekend of September 8-9, 2001, and said that his company was given three weeks advance notice that New York’s Port Authority would take out power in the South Tower from the 48th floor up. The reason: the Port Authority was performing a cabling upgrade to increase the WTC’s computer bandwidth

.source You now know PNAC flowered from the Israeli Clean Break papers out of Tel Aviv. (why the trail stops as soon as we get to Israel, on all the major “alternative” radio shows, I do not know) Why are the co-authors Zionists Jews who have histories of spying for Israel such as Richard Perle and Doug Feith? How come AIPAC can be caught spying on the US and there is NO mention of it in the media including Alex Jones ect (as far as I know). They have never even brought it up! It would ruin the theories that “Bush did it” from the films. And Bush did do it, but he was a puppet of his Zionist handlers because Bush is a Christian bigot. Ever wonder how the bombs were put in the towers? You probably know the President’s brother was head of security, did you know he had a moving company in the towers and building 7 in the weeks prior to 911? Did you know that that moving company was Israeli (Urban Moving systems) and Israelis were caught on 911 taking pictures of themselves to the backdrop of the burning towers and laughing? They were arrested and the address for their moving company (yes the same one) turned up a front for the Mossad, it was an abandoned warehouse in New Jersey. (They were released by the FBI when Ashcroft put a lid on it, and they went back to Israel). Their van had traced of explosives in it, box cutters, thousands in cash, and hilighted maps of New York. When tested they failed polyagraph tests which are 98% accurate. WRH has been on the frontlines with this story. It was clearly a Mossad opperation.

1. The Israeli “movers” cheered the 9-11 attacks to celebrate the successful accomplishment of the greatest spy operation ever pulled off in history. 2. One of them, or an accomplice, then calls a 9-1-1 police dispatcher to report Palestinian bomb-makers in a white van headed for the Holland Tunnel. 3. Having thus pre-framed the Palestinians with this phone call, the Israeli bombers then head for the George Washington Bridge instead, where they will drop off their time-bomb van and escape with Urban Moving accomplices. 4. But the police react very wisely and proactively by closing off ALL bridges and tunnels instead of just the Holland Tunnel. This move inadvertently foils the Israelis’ misdirection play and leads to their own capture and 40 day torture. 5. To cover up this story, the U.S. Justice Department rounds up over 1000 Arabs for minor immigration violations and places them in New York area jails. The Israelis therefore become less conspicuous as the government and media can now claim that the Israelis were just immigration violators caught in the same dragnet as many other Arabs. 6. After several months, FBI and Justice Department “higher-ups” are able to gradually push aside the local FBI agents and free the Israelis quietly.

source Go and read all of it. Look 911 was not carried out by Devil Worshipers or the Queen of England. 911 was the work of the Israeli Mossad and its Neocon moles in the US government. Many of the super Zionist are Russian Oligarchs protected by the London money powers. The back bone of Zionism is organized religion, it is fanatical Jews and Christians. More money goes to fund the Israeli occupation from Evangelical Christian churches than from the government even. (One church (Presbyterians) actually divested more money from Israel than what our government gives them in two years worth of foreign aid.) If we could only get other churches to follow… I know people will say that a con-artist like Pat Robertson is not a *real* Christian. News flash Yes he is. Is he a BAD Christian? Absolutely! But to say he does not hold the minimal believes in a savior, a god, the creation story, and all that other biblical mess is not true, because he and his millions of brain-dead followers DO believe in all that crap. In fact it is one of the main motivations help Zionism because they think they must create conditions to fulfill Biblical prophecies. (making Jerusalem Jewish being one of those.) Now if you just want to say that they do not follow some of the teachings of Christ then you are absolutely right. But then again basically no one does. Face it, All of Bush’s support comes from the 30 or so percent of the country that are Christian fanatics. Religion breeds authoritarianism. What would Israel do without the tens of billions it receives from Christian churches? It would fall apart. I am not saying that Christianity is to blame for what these evil idiots do. I am saying that a Religion is not intrinsically good or bad. Religion is more like a car, and the behavior of the car depends on the driver. It seems like Moderate Christians are psychologically unable to face up to the fact that their own religion is being used to stuff the war-mongers pockets and finance aggression all over the world [as it has since its invention]. So they invent groups like a secretly atheist illuminati and even alien invasion etc, anything, to create a blame shift. It was the Zionists. Here is the other thing Alex NEVER talks about, Israel being involved. And they were the ones who fricking did it. look here

OK now for the Disinfo PURE BULL

First I have to tackle the myth of the 4,000 Jews did not show up for work at the WTC on 911. This is simply not true. the figure came from Richard Perle owned Jerusalem Post. I heard the rumor on 911 by night fall the rumor was already there and I wa sin Virginia. A new person joined my Palestinian Group that I was the president of and told me the BS about the 4,000 Jews. Was I targeted for Disinfo to discredit me because I was the head of a Palestinian organization? Probably. I never repeated the story because I knew it was not true and even if it was there is no way this person could have known and confirmed that so soon.

DISIFO BY OMISSION (probably due to fear) When Alex Jones was asked by Allen Colmes of Fox, Who did it and how did they get away with it in the media? Alex stumbled over himself saying well you have to look at who authored PNAC and then went on to list high profile figures who have spoken out pretty much avoiding the question. Maybe he was just excited to name the people he wanted to say in a rare short interview on the mainstream. Well, in a way Alex did answer the question, because it was planned by the authors of PNAC as was the Iraq war. But it is a deathnail to plainly state that PNAC came out of Israel and stems from Israeli policy papers and was pushed for by a crowd that is overwhelmingly and disproportionately Jewish-Zionists some of whom have histories of spying for Israel or are currently caught up on charges (like Lewis Libby) for using the OSP to lie to push PNAC’s stated goals. And of course the Mossad story, the spy ring, and Niger forgeries, are simply dropped from the picture. Jones knows who the real power is and me because he wants to stay on the air, he will not directly mention them.

This is huge. Can you imagine if any other government was caught spying on the US in a time of War? Imagine what would happen if Iran was caught doing the same thing. .

STRAWMAN DISINFO I think the likes of those like Jeff Rense (a radio host who admits 911 was an inside job and has quite a following) is possibly a Real Patriot (or possibly a disinfo agent) but certainly not a critical thinker when it comes to ghosts and space aliens. That stuff HURTS the credibility. It is goofier than Zodiac signs. The site is still OK and you can pick out the real information from the entertainment (aka making money) stuff. The arguement that he has to say that junk just doesn’t float. I dont say any of that junk. Why is it so hard to just talk about the Zionist without ading sensless garbage to it? I would link to far more if the front page wasn’t cover in unsolved-mysteries type of superstitious trash. I am not saying that secret societies do not exist or that non-secret organizations (like the CIA) don’t carry out secret actions for the government. They do happen, and they have been around for a long time. Ranging from the Black Hand, to the America’s Know Nothings nations have always had groups of secrecy and privilege. The Bilderbergs is a great example. One can not say that conspiracies simply don’t exist or can not happen. Hell the `19 hijackers theory` (where the BBC reports that some of the same hijackers turned up alive) of 911 is a conspiracy theory, so one is forced to believe in one conspiracy theory or another. People will ask how could something so big be kept a secret? How could the press not uncover it? Conspiracies happen all the time,. I’ll give you a recent example. Just look the Iran Contra affair was a secret government and CIA operation that included thousands of people, involved multiple countries, and used up billions of dollars. This conspiracy happened in your life time (unless you are under 15). This scandal involved some of the very same neocons that are in office today. Familiar readers of anti-neocons are aware of the Libby/Rich/Clinton connections. (listen to it on the radio)

Guilt by association Don’t attach 911 to falsehoods like we never landed on the moon. First of all if any of you are so stupid as to think we were never on the moon then just don’t even bother reading the rest of this. The 911 evidence stands on its own, attaching it to silly things, just hurts the credibility and supports the tinfoil hat conclusions. PS NASA did bring lighting to the moon.

MORE DISINFO Thanks in large part to a music video called Pentagon Strike, We now have a `no plane hit the pentagon` crowd. Plently of people saw a plane fly towards the building and no one saw one leave. Look if a plane did hit the pentagon and they show that then it will debunk the entire 911 story. Did you ever think the FBI might have taken the tapes away in order to create such a story? Here are some arguments against the no plane theory. I have to agree. But this is a mute point. Let’s stick with the more damning evidence and that is the WTC 1,2, and 7 attacks/detonations. 911 is undeniably tied to the war in Iraq. It is obvious to any thinking person how the 911 tragedy was used to justify by deception the war in Iraq. We know that the WMDs claims were lies not just mistaken intelligence. Now the question arises, who lied? Who set up and makes up the OSP? All roads lead to Israel.

MORE DISINFO But this brings me to the disinformation wave. A couple of stinkers have come up. One is the Bohemian Grove tie in, which has been attributed to worshipers of Moloch and the Christian Devil. Did you ever think about the Grove connections worshipping Moloch could be related to the Bavli Talmud: the Jewish text from Babylon? It’s not the devil they follow it’s the Bavli Talmud; these people are Hardcore Zionists. (Guess who else was a Mizrahi Jew?…Mayer Amschel Rothschild) That is why they enjoy billions of dollars from Christian fanatics like Pat Robertson. This argument takes some time so go here if you need that to be cleared up. Is there a Satanic (or atheist) illuminati? NOPE It is the very opposite, the illuminati (as you guys think of it, the term is being used incorrectly) is the Zionist, not a German death cult. It is just a bunch of greedy, but god fearing, Christians and Jews at the Grove. Simply put, a religion is not what makes people good or bad; people are what make a religion good or bad.

All this talk of Germanic Death cults and Masonic symbols in everything in a total waste of time. Half Truth disinfo MORE DISINFO BY OMISSION We have the Chomsky ‘this war is all for oil crowd’. And also Rupert’s Peak Oil crowd. Oil was A reason for the wars but not THE reason. Chomsky and the like are very good at pointing out the big oil interests of the Iraq war and the petro-dollar interests with Iran. We get two camps, the ‘it’s about oil‘ and the ‘it’s about Israel’s safety’ crowd. Look, the corporatists and the Zionists overlap. The thing is, THIS war party is so clearly made up of Zionists. But no one seems to catch the overlapping interests of the corporations (namely the largest one the MIC) and the Zionists. As I pointed out on KUCI they don’t give a damn about Jews or any of that, nor does the Lobby. They just care about money, but what safe guards them from criticism IS the religious angle. Corporations could not get away with it if they didn’t have their all powerful anti-Semitism shield of protection around them and they would not have the hundreds of billions of dollars in extra backing from Christian religious factions without the religion/race card played by the Zionists. So it is multi-layered. The fact that Zionists wrote, planned for the war in Iraq as far back as 1992, and then actively played a part in spewing the pre-invasion disinformation makes it rather obvious to me who is in the front seat and who is cheering from the back seat between the Zionist and the energy companies. If you want to know how the Libby/Niger-gate tie into the warmonger’s plans for Iran then listen to my radio interview. 911 and the resulting wars were planned in PNAC. I have gone through each Zionist player in the administration at one point or another on this board on on the radio, and tied their actions back to Israel. Just ask yourself this question, what do Richard Perle, Lewis Libby, Douglas Feith, Paul Wolfowitz, David Frum, David Wurmser, Irving Kristol, Bill Kristol, Steven Rosen, and Keith Weissman, all have in common? It is a war for Israel primarily and a war for profit, as is any war, secondarily. I wrote in my book how they all connect, the MIC, the Evangelical churches, the lobby, and the Zionists neocons who make up the OSP and wrote PNAC. That is why I wrote Welcome to the USSA, to explain how no-bid contract work in communism and how we create state assisted monopolies through everything from agribusiness subsidies to earmarked foreign aid. If we are to keep moving forward then we need to be aware of disinformation. It is my opinion, and I know I will get accused of in-fighting, but it is my opinion that we should drop the extreme end of the spectrum, the alien believers-who must admit that pragmatically, even if they sincerely believe in all that junk, they know that tactically it does not help us one bit. No one is ready to believe in reptilian fish people. So shut up you guys. Please do the rest of us a favor and just talk amongst yourselves. I question your sanity. People don’t let these shanky hands, Nostradamus-type, fold up the twenty dollar bill and look at the towers, retards pollute our real efforts of journalism and research into 911. Please stop saying it was the illuminati (a vague term) if you don’t really know anything about the illuminati other than a 5 minute history and you can’t immediately back up your claims with convincing arguments. (It is not a secret who did this, PNAC spells it out and shows it off.) I care about this country and the people we exploit, oppress, and kill. I want it to stop. Damn it! I really deeply need it to stop. The Occupation of Iraq and Palestine and Afghanistan have to end. We have killed hundred of thousands of innocent people. We are torturing people. The real people who demonstratively wrote, planned, signed, lied, and carried out this war are ZIONISTS NEOCONS. (Just for the record the Brits need to get out of Ireland). Don’ blame it on a mysterious group of people when we already have the names and the physical evidence of who did this. We seem to have about half a story floating around about 911. The Israeli connections have to made or refuted. I have not heard of any valid refutations.

The anti-Semite card is all I have ever hear as an attempted rebuttal. The reply I usually get is, “wow god damn I didn’t know about that, how interesting.” I know you guys are smart, look into it yourselves. Lastly, Here is a special type of disinfo. We have to band together to stop the Military Industrial COmplex take over but you need to know who is really behind the wizard’s curtain. NO MORE WAR FOR ISRAEL! Divest! A new kind of Disinfo has surfaced. These would be the kooks talking about the “Jesuits” and the kooks talking about “space weapons or energy beam weapons” AKA Laser. Dude the towers fell from bombs not lasers. I saw them come down that was an explosion. ——————————————————————

You can read the Time line of the Middle East here

Jews across Israel and United States of America stood up against the zionist lobby when they rejected 60 years of Israel’s existence as nothing more than apartheid and injustice to Palestinians. It sent a strong message to the Lobby that injustice will no longer be tolerated in the name of Judaism.

You can find more information on

Jews Mourning Naqba

While Israel provided a home for Jewish refugees after the Holocaust, some from our own families, the terrible fact is that over 700,000 Palestinians were made into refugees to make room for the future state of Israel. Sixty years and several generations later, that number has swelled to an estimated seven million. Many live in 58 registered refugee camps dispersed throughout the Middle East, still denied their rights under international law.
That is why the creation of the state of Israel is known as the Nakba, or the Catastrophe, to Palestinians. Today the Palestinian Nakba continues. Inside of the 1948 borders of Israel, Palestinian citizens are denied legal rights received by Jews. Palestinians in Gaza, the West Bank, and East Jerusalem are denied access to land, water, health care, and other basic resources. Palestinians throughout historic Palestine experience international isolation, economic devastation aided by the erection of a 730-kilometer wall, and continued closures and invasions including the current horrific siege of Gaza.

Jews Against Zionist Terrorism in Palestine

And that is why many of us are refusing to celebrate: as long as Palestinians are still fighting for their fundamental human rights, we cannot rejoice.
Any peaceful future depends on recognizing both the Palestinian and the Israeli narrative. And yet, just as the names of over 400 pre-1948 Palestinian towns and cities have been deliberately erased from maps, the history of the Palestinian Nakba itself has been all but erased from Jewish consciousness

As Jews, we are members of a community that has repeatedly suffered exile and ethnic cleansing. We refuse to remain silent while this oppression is perpetuated upon another people in our name. To this end, we will continue to work within Jewish community and also in solidarity with Palestinian community, as we seek a self-determination for Jews that does not depend on the displacement and oppression of another people.

also see:
and more photos!

The Israeli Holocaust Against Arab Children


Researched and created by Michael Hoffman

Last revision: April 5, 2002

Israeli Child Killers: Documentary Proof

Murdering Children for Sport

“Ali Murad Abu Shaweesh was 12 when Israeli soldiers shot him in the back. Ali was killed on the same day in June, 2001 that Sharon refused to let the Israeli foreign minister, Shimon Peres, meet with Yasir Arafat, yet his death also went unnoticed by American television news. But not entirely unnoticed, since the Israeli soldiers, who taunted the Palestinian boys over loudspeakers outside the Khan Yunis refugee camp in the Gaza Strip, goading them to come out and throw rocks, did so under the gaze of Chris Hedges, a reporter for the New York Times.

“Children have been shot in other conflicts I have covered–death squads gunned them down in El Salvador and Guatemala, mothers with infants were lined up and massacred in Algeria, and Serb snipers put children in their sights…in Sarajevo–but I have never before watched soldiers entice children like mice into a trap and murder them for sport,” Hedges wrote. His account, coolly factual yet full of passionate intensity, was written not for his own paper but for Harper’s Magazine, which sent Hedges to Gaza on his vacation.” The Nation, March 11, 2002

Israelis Kill 13 Year Old Boy

Little Ahmed Ghanem bids a final farewell to the remains of his big brother, Mahmoud, 13, in the village of Sara in the West Bank. Mahmoud was shot in the head March 10, 2002 by Israeli troops, west of Nablus.

Israelis Murder Palestinian Family: Mother and three children

The body of Mohammad Abu Kweik, 8, is lifted from the carnage after the Mitsubishi pick-up truck he was travelling in was bombed by Israeli forces in the West Bank Palestinian ghetto of Ramallah, March 4, 2002. Six Palestinian civilians, including the boy’s mother, Bushra Kweik, 38, and two sisters, Bara, 14, and Aziza, 16, were killed when Israeli troops bombed their truck after their mother had picked them up from school. The car behind them was also hit. The man the Israelis were attempting to assassinate was not in either vehicle. Two Palestinian children, ages 4 and 16, were killed in the second vehicle.

Also on March 4, Israeli troops opened fire on an ambulance in the Jenin refugee camp and killed a doctor, 57 year old Khalil Suleiman. Three medics and a nine year old girl were wounded in the Israeli army attack.

Commenting on the preceding Israeli army “raids” of March 4, Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon stated: “Anyone wishing to conduct negotiations with Palestinians must first hit them hard…We must inflict heavy losses on their side.” Source: Los Angeles Times, March 5, 2002

Curator’s note: The Kweik family name is also spelled “Quaiek” in some reports

Israelis Murder 12 year old boy

The body of Mohammed Houmeduk, 12, shot and killed in cold blood Dec. 18, 2001 in the Khan Younis refugee camp in the Gaza Strip, by Israeli soldiers.

Israelis Murder Two Palestinian Boys: a 2 year old and a 13 Year Old

Hebron, Dec. 10, 2001. Editor’s note: We have no post-mortem photo of the two year old victim, Burhan Sidir. The Israelis blew him apart. His head was found in the street. His legs were in different places.

The photo above is of the other victim, 13 year old Shadi Arafi killed by Israeli forces. Two brothers, aged 8 and 10 were also seriously injured in the Dec. 10 Israeli attack.

Zahra Sidir said her son Burhan’s third birthday was to be March 27. “Can you think of a crime uglier than this?” she asked. “A targeted person? My two year old son?”

On Nov. 22, 2001, five Palestinian school boys ages 7 to 14 were on their way to classes in the Gaza strip when they were killed by a bomb planted by Israeli forces

Palestinian children hold photos of three of the five school boys murdered by the Israelis

Palestinian children bid farewell to their deceased playmates, killed by a booby-trapped bomb planted on the path to their school by the child-killing Israeli army

Israel “….places explosive charges where children are likely to pass and then claims that only the other side practices terrorism?” –Gideon Levy,”On The Way To School,” Ha’aretz, Nov. 26, 2001

Also cf. NY Times, Dec. 11, 2001, p. A12

The sister of 13-year-old Mohammed Abu Libda, who was shot to death by Israeli troops, cries during his funeral as her brother’s body is brought home in southern Gaza, September 9, 2001.

Israelis Murder 11 Year Old Palestinian Boy

The remains of Mohammed Zurub (above). Zionist occupation troops shot dead the 11-year old Palestinian boy in the Gaza ghetto on August, 23, 2001. Haaretz newspaper reported: “Witnesses said that Mohammed Zurub was shot in the heart after throwing stones at IDF (Israeli) troops.”

Mohammed Zurub’s relatives mourn the 11 year old boy’s murder by Zionist occupation troops, Aug. 23, 2001

Israelis Murder 14 Year Old Palestinian Boy

The body of Mohammed Abu Arrar, 14, is caressed by a relative prior to burial. The boy was shot to death in the Gaza ghetto by Israeli soldiers, August 19, 2001.

Israelis Murder 8 Year Old Palestinian Girl

Israeli soldiers shot this eight-year-old Palestinian girl, Sabreen Abu Sneineh, in the head, in Hebron, Aug. 12, 2001

Israelis Murder Two Palestinian Brothers

Two Palestinian brothers, Bilal Abu Khader, 8, and Ashraf Abu Khader, 5, were killed in the West Bank town of Nablus, July 31, 2001 by Israeli helicopter gunships, which rocketed the center of a Palestinian population center in the middle of the day. Six other Palestinians were killed during the Jewish-sponsored assassinations.

Israeli Settlers Murder Three Month Old Palestinian Baby

The body of murdered 3-month-old Palestinian infant Diya Tmaizi, center, is flanked by murdered Palestinian civilians Mohammed Hilmy Tmaizi, 20, right, and Mohammed Salameh Tmaizi, 22, left, in the West Bank village of Idna, near Hebron. The Palestinian baby and the other civilians were shot and killed, and at least four other Palestinian civilians were injured late Thursday, July 19, 2001, near Idna. According to Israeli radio, a Jewish “settler” group took responsibility for the murders.

Israeli Army Opens Fire on Children’s Playground

Ibrahim Al-Mugrabi weeps over his 11-year-old son, Khalil Ibrahim, who was slain in the Rafah section of the Gaza ghetto after the Israeli army strafed the boy’s playground with machine gun fire.

Khalil Ibrahim al-Mugrabi, 11, was shot in the head and killed July 7, 2001 near Rafah in the Gaza ghetto. Two other Arab children playing with him were wounded, one seriously, after the Israeli army sprayed machine gun fire at a crowd of Arab children.

The children were gunned down by Israeli soldiers from a Jewish guard tower as they were playing. Doctors said the dead Palestinian boy was shot in the head and that a 10-year-old boy was seriously wounded with a gun shot to the stomach. A third Palestinian boy, age 12, was injured less seriously.

Mohammed Abu-Shikadem, 29, who was nearby when the shootings took place, said that a group of some 30 children were playing near the refugee camp when he heard a burst of machine gun fire from the Israeli guard tower. “Two of the children fell in front of my eyes,” Abu-Shikadem said.

Israelis Kill Baby Girl and School-Teacher, Wound Ten other Children in Refugee Camp

KHAN YUNIS REFUGEE CAMP, Palestine– May 7, 2001– Israeli troops shelled homes in this Arab refugee camp today and fired large-caliber machine guns, killing a 4-month-old baby girl and wounding 24 civilians. Doctors said 10 Palestinian children were among the injured.

One Israeli cannon shell hit the shack of the Hijo family in the refugee camp, instantly killing 4-month-old Iman Hijo, with shrapnel tearing a hole into the infant’s back. The girl’s 19-year-old mother, as well as three brothers and sisters, were wounded, including 18-month-old Mahmoud Hijo, was in intensive care at Nasser Hospital with shrapnel wounds, doctors said.

The slain infant’s uncle, Wael Hijo, carried the girl’s body from the hospital’s autopsy room to the X-ray department. In the emergency room, Iman’s 7-year-old aunt, Dunya, sat on a bed with a dazed look on her face, her frilly white-and-green dress pulled up above scraped and bandaged legs. “They killed the baby,” Dunya said, then burst into tears.

Israeli troops also fired on the refugee camp’s Khaldieh School in the West Bank, killing a Palestinian school-teacher.

Palestinian boy, 12, killed in Khan Yunis

A 12-year old Palestinian, Muhind Nizar Muharb, was killed April 23 in Khan Yunis refugee camp, in the Gaza Strip, when Israeli soldiers opened fire on Palestinian demonstrators at the funeral of a slain Palestinian. At least ten other Palestinians were injured. (Source: Ha’aretz, April 24, 2001)

Israeli army targets Palestinian children in grenade attack on playground

Palestinian child, wounded in Israeli army grenade attack on his schoolyard, is carried to an ambulance

“In the Old City of Hebron, (March 15, 2001), Israeli soldiers lobbed a stun grenade into a schoolyard during an elementary students’ demonstration. The students were throwing stones at Israeli cars, Israeli officials said. Six students suffered moderate or light wounds, including burns, broken bones and blisters, Palestinian officials said. The Israelis said five Palestinian children had experienced ‘light impact injuries from the grenade.’

“The army sees the removal of children from the circle of violence as extremely important,” an Israeli army statement said. The army will “continue to act against anyone trying to compromise the security of Israeli citizens,” it said.

Source: N.Y. Times, March 16, 2001, p. A-10

“Six Palestinian children suffered burns on Thursday (March 15, 2001) when Israeli soldiers threw a stun grenade into a West Bank schoolyard in new violence after an Israeli pledge to ease its blockade on Palestinians. Doctors in Hebron said three of the six children sustained burns to the head, hands and back and the other three were suffering from blisters and shock.

“Why did they throw the grenade into the yard? This is only a provocation,’ said teacher Mohammed Hawaismah as parents carried children out of the school and into ambulances.

Source: Reuters, March 15, 2001

by Nicholas Kollerstrom, PhD

As surprising as it may sound, the only intentional mass extermination program in the concentration camps of WW2 was targeted at Germans. From April, 1945 five million Germans were rounded up after surrendering, and deliberately starved until well over one million had died, in French and American-run concentration camps[1] – an event soon erased from the history books. There was, in contrast, never a centrally-coordinated Nazi program of exterminating Jews in Germany. Lethal gas chambers did not function in German labour-camps, that’s just an illusion. The traditional Holocaust story has developed out of rumours, misunderstandings, and wartime propaganda. From stories pre-dating the Second World War to the Nuremberg Trials which gave official sanction to the notion, to subsequent trials, books and films, we have had it imprinted on our collective psyche. In most of Europe now, it is a thoughtcrime to believe what you have just read, punishable by imprisonment, so think carefully before deciding to read on.

The real experts on this subject are – in jail, so maybe you will put up with hearing my view instead? Europe needs, more than anything else, a truth and reconciliation forum to get to the bottom of these matters, and to try and exorcise the demonic hate-images. Ever more nations are passing laws that prohibit citizens from expressing doubt – Germany, France, Austria, Poland, Romania, Belgium, Switzerland, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Collectively, we need to work trough our despair, rage, and ideas of blame, to try and access the real historical record.

Cyanide at Auschwitz

Zyklon-B was used at Auschwitz, as an insecticide. It was vital in attempting to maintain hygiene that mattresses be deloused. Cyanide gas was adsorbed onto clay-type granules, designed to make the deadly gas as ‘safe’ as it could be. If you go to Auschwitz today, you can’t see any authentic gas chambers. You see stone huts, and experts have testified that they could not have been used to gas people, owing to problems in sealing them up (Zyklon-B released its cyanide gas rather slowly[2]).

In 1988 the scientific team of Fred Leuchter (a US execution-expert ‘Mr Death’ in gas-chamber technology) visited Poland, and concluded that the Auschwitz ‘gas chambers’ could not possibly have functioned in the alleged manner – i.e., they were not gas chambers[3]. In the following years, others would confirm the accuracy of his seminal, ‘Leuchter Report’. The German chemist Germar Rudolf, who worked at the Max Plank institute for Solid State Physics, is now in jail, because he likewise measured the high levels of the cyanide in the walls of the de-lousing chambers. It happens that this gas bonds permanently with iron, and iron is present in all the cement etc of stone walls. Whereas, he found none in the walls of what were supposed to be the ‘gas chambers’ which were mainly shower units. He thereby confirmed the work of Leuchter who likewise only found remains of the cyanide gas-insecticide in the delousing chambers.[4]

After Rudolf’s report was published in 1993, he lost his job and was prevented from completing his doctorate, then a few years later he was given a jail sentence. He is now in a high-security prison near Stuttgart, for the crime of not finding cyanide in the ‘gas chambers[5],’ echoing Leuchter’s cyanide residue investigations. [6] When a chemist is put in jail, for replicating the result of another – in Germany of all places, the nation which invented chemical procedure – then the farce cannot continue for much longer[7] (The gas chambers were conveniently located east of Germany behind the Iron Curtain to make them inaccessible to westerners, which helped the myth to flourish).

The Leuchter results were almost too good to be true, with a three orders of magnitude difference between the cyanide levels in the delousing chamber walls (about one part per thousand) and those in the washing chambers (aka ‘gas chambers’), around one part per million. They are not published in any peer-reviewed chemistry journal, for obvious reasons. The only way to hold a debate on this subject appears to be in a courtroom, while being prosecuted! It is hard to reach the calm condition necessary for replication of chemical measurements. Nonetheless people have replicated the fundamental result[8], and even folk with no interest in chemistry can appreciate the pretty blue colour on the outside of the de-lousing chamber (where the Ferro cyanide has seeped right through the wall) and its complete absence around the so-called ‘gas chambers.’ Let’s face it, the case is established: the cyanide poison was used where the German records state that it was used – for delousing mattresses, clothing etc – whereas it was not used where the US and UK (at Nuremberg) alleged.

Tourists, thirty million of them, have filed through ‘Krema 1’ at Auschwitz, with its piteous piles of shoes, etc of the dead. This was reconstructed after the war in 1946[9], a fact revealed 1992 by Dr. Franciszek Piper, the Senior Curator and Director of Archives of the Auschwitz State Museum. The historic remains from the camp are such things as shower-unit huts, a swimming pool and a morgue. There was a camp orchestra, and quite a collection of pictures from the camp art-classes,[10] although these cannot be shown in Germany or Poland, on account of laws prohibiting the doubting of the Holocaust. Anne Frank of ‘Diary’ fame came to the camp in 1944 with her father who was ill. He was put into the hospital there, and recovered, suggesting that he was decently looked after.[11]

The ‘gas chambers’ at Auschwitz had water pipes in their ceilings, indicating that they were designed as shower units. They generally lacked tight-seal doors, which would have been essential, even though these were easy to install – the Leuchter report cited the absence of such seals as one reason why the alleged ‘gas chambers’ would never have functioned.

The Arithmetic of Annihilation

The primary argument put forward by Professor Arthur Butz in his classic text, The Hoax of the 20th Century was demographic: the Jews of Europe were still there after the war and therefore had not been exterminated. They had generally moved eastwards, and once the Iron curtain came down in 1948 it became difficult to count them. Some two million emigrated from Europe, both to Palestine and America. Between 3 ½ and 4 million Jews had lived in all the lands controlled by Adolf Hitler[12], of which an upper limit of one million died in WW2: the figure of a million dead, ‘while possible, seems rather high to me’, concluded Butz[13],[14] – a figure to be contrasted with ten million Germans who died during and just after that war[15]. If somewhere around fifty million people died during WW2, that Jewish mortality comprised some 2% of this total: which is about the average for Europe, i.e. no great excess of Jews died in WW2. Almost half a million Jews dwelt in Germany around 1930 (around 1% of the population), and by 1939 many had emigrated, some 270,000 remaining[16].

The figure of six million dead is given in the ‘Holocaust’ section in Wikipedia, with three million having died in Poland. Its high ‘extermination’ figures are given in counties well to the East of Germany. East Europe was then the epicentre of world Jewry, and in the years around WWII a vast diaspora of Jews took place, mainly into what became the Soviet Union, but also Palestine and America. Poland had 10% of its total population Jewish in the 1930s and the Polish premier had ‘stated repeatedly that there were a million too many Jews in Poland’[17] –so the pressure on them to emigrate was not solely due to German policies. British rule in Palestine disintegrated in 1938, which meant that its strict immigration quotas ceased to apply. A very careful estimate of East Europe’s Jewish population ascertained that there were 2.6 million in Poland at the outbreak of the war – less than the total Polish ‘deaths’ given by Wikipedia. It put total worldwide mortality of Jews through WWII at 1 ¼ million, of which most was due to ‘Soviet barbarism’ rather than German labour-camps[18]. That seems quite comparable to the figure given above. Within the Nazi labour-camps, around four hundred and fifty thousand Jews died.[19]

Around 500,000 prisoners were registered in the labour-camps of Auschwitz in Poland, of which some 130,000 died[20]. Bodies were there disposed of by individual cremation, and the records for coke fuel consumption over the period February 1942 – October 1943 for the cremation ovens indicate that around five thousand bodies were then burnt. That accords with the number of registered, deceased inmates, viz those who had died from natural causes[21], who had to be cremated rather than buried because of the great typhoid epidemics. This demonstrates that no mass-incineration of bodies took place. Josef Kramer, a supervisor at the Auschwitz camp, gave a statement after the war which is recommended by Professor Butz as probably genuine: it had 350-500 deaths per week happening over May-November 1944, all from natural causes, a very high figure because sick prisoners were sent there, and the dead were all cremated. He believed the camp held up to 100,000 prisoners, mainly Poles and Prussians.[22]

The Final Solution – An Export Program

The ‘Final Solution’ of Adolf Hitler retained a single meaning right through WW2, central to the program of ‘National socialism,’ and signified the deportation of Jews, generally eastwards to Poland and Russia[23]. This program did not change at any point, e.g. the Wannsee conference of 1942,[24] to signify deliberate extermination. If that practice ever happened, it was not a centrally-directed policy and did not involve gas chambers: many tons of documentation of ‘third Reich’ policies remains, and no-one has been able to find therein any hint of such a meaning – of intentional genocide. The historical record fails to show any central decision to exterminate Jews by Nazi Germany.

The Gestapo and Zionists were collaborating in the late 30s because they had in this respect similar aims.[25] But, a German Foreign Office circular bulletin of June 22, 1937 stated that: ‘In view of the anti-German agitation of international Jewry, Germany cannot agree that the formation of a Palestine Jewish state would help the peaceful development of the nations of the world’.[26] International Jewish organisations twice declared war on Germany, in 1933 then again in 1939[27]. As the ‘final solution’ policy[28] was thwarted by the Allies, the camps became places of hard labour; then under the impact of Allied terror-bombing ravages of disease and famine took place.

No Documents!

At the Auschwitz trial held at Frankfurt in the mid-sixties, the court had to conclude that it lacked ‘almost all the means or evidence available in a normal murder trial’ including ‘the bodies of the victim, autopsy reports, expert reports on the cause of death, evidence as to the criminals, murder weapons, etc[29].’ Far from leading to doubt, this gave to the mythic gas chambers a metaphysical status, doubt of which was forbidden. ‘No documents have survived, perhaps none ever existed,’ concluded the Holocaust historian Léon Poliakov.[30]

‘In the case of the rush to impute to the Nazis a programme for the extermination of millions of people which has implausibly left no material traces, all the normal rules of historiography seem not only to have been suspended, but to have been violated over and over again. Historians routinely cite documents from secondary works like Raul Hilberg’s The Destruction of the European Jews (1961) or from printed collections of documents, such as Robert Wolfe’s Holocaust: The Documentary Evidence – but they never cite original documents.[31]

The nearest we have to primary-source documents concerning what went on within the camps, comes from the bulky, three-volume International Red Cross Report published in 1948. This and especially Volume III describes the couple of thousand regular, routine inspection-visits that its doctors made through the war years to the Polish labour-camps. Their report never hints at any gas-chamber, nor any mass-cremations. While maintaining a politically neutral position[32], it confirms that mortality in the camps was to a large extent caused by the allied terror-bombing.[33] Likewise Winston Churchill’s bulky, six-volume account of the War gives no allusion to the subject, especially volume Six, Triumph and Tragedy where one would expect to have some allusion if he believed it had happened.[34]

The head of the SS camp administration office sent a directive dated Dec. 28, 1942, to Auschwitz and the other concentration camps. It sharply criticised the high death rate of inmates due to disease, and ordered that “camp physicians must use all means at their disposal to significantly reduce the death rate in the various camps.” Furthermore, it ordered: “The camp doctors must supervise more often than in the past the nutrition of the prisoners and, in cooperation with the administration, submit improvement recommendations to the camp commandants … The camp doctors are to see to it that the working conditions at the various labor places are improved as much as possible.” The directive stressed that “the Reichsfuhrer SS [Heinrich Himmler] has ordered that the death rate absolutely must be reduced.”[35] A further letter to all concentration camp commanders dated 20th January, 1943, reaffirmed that ‘every means must be used to lower the death rate.’ By September 1943 Auschwitz still had mortality peaking at 80/day, viewed as ‘catastrophic’ by the SS administration. Thus, from authentic documents concerning the need to reduce fatalities at the Auschwitz camp, the world has moved to a belief in genocide, with not a single authentic, supporting document[36]. The Auschwitz camp was set up as an industrial plant using the giant coalfields of Poland, and located at the confluence of rivers; it was essential to the war-effort – it would have made no sense to start exterminating its inmates.

The Hamburg judge Wilhelm Staeglich had been positioned near Auschwitz during the war and had on various occasions dropped into the camps around there. The conditions seemed fairly tolerable, he recalled, and certainly nothing resembling an extermination program existed. In particular, he had discerned no fear of mistreatment amongst the inmates. He published a testimony to this effect in 1973, and in return for his shocking news a German inquisition forced him to resign his job, stripped him of his doctoral degree, and banned his book. He was then subjected to police raids. His book, translated into English, is an essential text.[37]

German military radio messages were successfully decrypted at Bletchley Park using the ‘enigma’ codebreaker. Concerning the labour camps, over the period Spring 1942-February ’43, the following information was obtained: ‘The return from Auschwitz, the largest of the camps with 20,000 prisoners, mentioned illness as the main cause of death, but included references to shootings and hangings. There were no references in the decrypts to gassings.’[38] That seems clear enough – though no-one took any notice of it at Nuremberg.

No Photos!

Not only is there no trace of ‘Third Reich’ documentation[39] for what is alleged, but no photographs exist showing anything resembling such a group-gassing procedure. Do you believe that Jews both male and female stripped then marched into the gas chambers, then were hauled out in piles? If so, are you willing to believe that neither the very-thorough Germans nor the clever Jews wanted or were able to get a single picture of this ultimate horror? Go to Google and search – you’ll find rows of emaciated bodies, dead of typhus, will that do? I don’t think so.

US air-photographs taken in 1944 (released in 1978) when the ‘program’ was supposed to be in full swing do not show any huge crematoria burning corpses nor queues entering the ‘gas chambers: ‘The few air photos of Auschwitz-Birkenau known to date from the period of December 1943 to February 1945 show no signs of fuel depots, smoke from chimneys or open fires, burning pits or pyres. The photos were altered: Zyklon B input hatches, groups of inmates, and walls around crematoria were retouched onto the photo negatives … To this day there is no air photo evidence to support the alleged mass murder of the Jews at any location in Europe occupied by the Germans during World War Two….That the photos in western hands were altered in order to incriminate Germany, and were first published by the CIA, is also very significant indeed.’[40]

The Fabrication of Untruth

Let’s hear a couple of testimonies concerning the dreaded gas-chambers. An Austrian woman, Maria Van Herwaarden, testified about her camp experiences in a Toronto District Court in March 1988, as she had been interned in Auschwitz-Birkenau in 1942 for having sexual relations with a Polish forced laborer. On the train trip to the camp, a Gypsy woman told her and the others that they would all be gassed at Auschwitz. Upon arrival, Maria and the other women were ordered to undress and go into a large concrete room without windows to take a shower. The terrified women were sure that they were about to die. But then, instead of gas, water came out of the shower heads. Auschwitz was no vacation center, Maria confirmed, and she witnessed the death of many fellow inmates by disease, particularly typhus, and quite a few committed suicide. But she saw no evidence at all of mass killings, gassings, or of any extermination program.[41] A Jewish woman named Marika Frank arrived at Auschwitz-Birkenau from Hungary in July 1944, when 25,000 Jews were supposedly gassed and cremated daily. She likewise testified after the war that she heard and saw nothing of “gas chambers” during the time she was interned there. She heard the gassing stories only later.[42]

The Allied carpet-bombing destroyed the supply lines for the Camps, and so the death-toll mounted from famine and disease. Leaflets were dropped from the air, alleging that at Auschwitz a ‘final solution’/extermination of Jews policy was being conducted, using gas. [43] That was the genesis of the story, as those Allied-propaganda leaflets were believed. Greeted by the sight, of rows of famished Jews who had died of e.g. typhoid, it was not hard to see its confirmation. Far from it being common knowledge in Germany that people were being gassed … the vast majority of Germans were horrified by the United Nations accusations and they protested that they had never heard of such acts until after the cessation of hostilities when they had begun listening to United Nations broadcasts …. Since the British Broadcasting Corporation had been broadcasting these accusations regularly for many months before the end of the war, those Germans who had “common knowledge” of the gassing before the war’s end most likely got this “knowledge” from the BBC!’[44] The gas-chamber legend was born in December 1941, when the German author Thomas Mann declared on the BBC that, in German hospitals, the severely wounded, the old and the feeble were culled with poison gas. This was the ‘first appearance of gas chambers in propaganda.’[45]

As to how the stories got going, here is a remark by Faurisson: ‘The Foreign Office saw the new rumors of the Second World War only as Jewish inventions, and many in American circles shared that conviction[46]. Edward Beneš, President of Czechoslovakia (in exile in London), announced in November 1942, after inquiry by his staff, that the Germans, contrary to what had been reported to him, were not exterminating the Jews. The American Jew, Felix Frankfurter, a Supreme Court judge, stated to Jan Karski on the subject: “I can’t believe you.” In August of 1943, Cordell Hull, Secretary of State, warned the U.S. ambassador in Moscow by telegram that in planning a joint Allied statement on “the German crimes in Poland“, it would be advisable to eliminate any mention of the gas chambers, since, as the British pointed out, there was “insufficient evidence” in the matter[47]

The Hoax of Nuremberg

A modern inquiry needs to start from the data-fabrication at Nuremberg by the US/UK, using systematic assassination and torture of witnesses. The Nuremberg trials started in 1946 with the image of six million dead as firmly established.[48] This did not emerge as a conclusion from the trials, but in its immensity it was presented to the tortured and/or beaten[49] Nazis as a fact, and would they confess their part in it? All the main defendants at Nuremberg insisted that prior to the trial they had not known of any mass murder of Jews: except that Rudolf Höss, the former Commandant of Auschwitz, signed on March 15, 1946, a document averring that he had overseen the slaughter of two and a half million Jews, and this was read out on 15th April at Nurnberg. That day signified the birth of Auschwitz’s horror-myth. Two weeks earlier, Höss had remarked:

Certainly, I signed a statement that I killed two and half million Jews. I could just as well have said it was five million Jews. There are certain methods by which any confession can be obtained, whether it is true or not.”[50]

Decades later, an account was published of how Höss had been tortured for three days and nights without sleep by a British army team in order to extract that statement.[51] In a letter to his wife, Höss apologised for his ‘confessions’ and explains that they had been extracted from him under torture[52]. The victorious Allies could not have their ‘truth’ come out at Nuremberg, without the assistance of torture. In 2001, Patricia Meehan discussed the network of secret “Direct Interrogation Centres” the British had set up in their occupational zone of Germany[53] – torture chambers, to prepare ‘evidence’ for the upcoming trials. A Zionist influence was noted at the Nuremberg trials,[54] not least concerning the figure of six million.[55]

Weighty books are in print as memorials to ‘the Holocaust’, but, let’s hear a sceptical view from Down Under:

“…Yet in the case of the Holocaust, the dearth of material evidence for the existence of large-scale extermination programme is not perceived as significant. It is assumed that the Nazis destroyed their vast death machinery so thoroughly as to preclude all possibility of post-war detection. It is not permissible to express doubts as to whether the Nazis could really have eliminated all material evidence so completely, including making the ashes of six million people vanish from the locations at which they must have been interred. To think such doubts is to engage in thought crime….

‘The reality, therefore, is that the bulk of the ‘evidence’ for the Holocaust derives from a corpus of documents that was expressly manufactured by the OSS and OCC in 1945-46 for the purpose of incriminating the leaders of the former German government at Nuremberg. The procedure went roughly along these lines: the Documentation Division in Paris created ‘copies’ (in English only), certified them as true, and sent them to the prosecution in Nuremberg, while the original documents (if they ever existed) were never seen or heard of again. German translations of the original English texts were then prepared and sent to the defense in Nuremberg, where they arrived as late as possible so that the defense had insufficient time to worry about such matters as their authenticity….

‘Starting in May 1945 with the alleged suicides of SS-General Hans-Adolf Prützmann, SS head Heinrich Himmler and SS-General Odilo Globocnik while in British captivity, there followed a bizarre string of murders of individuals associated with the Auschwitz concentration camp. (These were perpetrated by a Jewish hit squad known as the DIN.) As Joseph Bellinger, author of a new book on Himmler’s murder, points out, within six months or so of the war’s end practically any one who could have shed light on the Jewish policy of the Third Reich was murdered!’ This, it must be said, was extremely convenient for the prosecution at Nuremberg.[56]

At Nuremberg, the German war-generals as well as being tortured had their wives arrested, to dissuade them from making inappropriate remarks in court. They were kept in solitary confinement to prevent their comparing notes, as each was presented with the Great Untruth and asked to believe it. Finally, most of them were hanged, by a court which felt free to invent new laws, and to act as prosecutor, judge, lawyer and executioner: American justice!

Coming of the Truthseekers

In the post-war years, anyone claiming to have a personal memory of the German gas-chambers would be liable to have Paul Rassinier turn up on their doorstep. Having himself experience the hell of the Buchenwald camp he was far from being a fan of the Nazis; but, neither was he prepared to endure fabricated stories on the subject. He spent years travelling about Europe with his tape-recorder and questions, but always he found that the witnesses came out with ‘evasions or palpable lies,’ and his published report concluded:

With regard to the gas chambers, the almost endless procession of false witnesses and of falsified documents to which I have drawn the reader’s attention during this long study, proves, nevertheless, one thing: never at any moment did the responsible authorities of the Third Reich intend to order – or in fact order – the extermination of the Jews in this or any other manner.[57]

That bold conclusion (for which he was, naturally, jailed) kick-started the ‘revisionist’ movement! We may here note that the money which the FRG keeps paying out to ‘holocaust survivors’ does enormous damage here, in stimulating ‘memories’ and generating such averred cases.

David Irving, Ernst Zundel, and Germar Rudolf

Revisionist Pioneers: David Irving, Ernst Zündel, and Germar Rudolf

Robert Faurisson investigated the configuration of the alleged Auschwitz ‘gas chambers,’ then Zundel[58] got to hear of this. At a historic 1985 trial in Toronto, witnesses were grilled for the first time ever over the existence of the alleged ‘gas chambers,’ and it was found that no such testimony would stand up. Faurisson was an advisor to Zundel in this trial, and a subsequent one, and this duo just kept on winning the arguments. The prosecution could come up with no credible witnesses for a gas-chamber’s existence:

“… in 1988, during the second trial against Ernst Zündel, the public prosecutor deemed it prudent to abandon any recourse to witnesses. Canadian justice had apparently understood the lesson of the first trial: there were no credible witnesses to the existence and operation of the ‘Nazi gas chambers’. Little by little, every other country in the world has learned this same lesson. At the trial of Klaus Barbie in France, in 1987, there was talk about the gas chambers of Auschwitz but no one produced any witnesses who could properly speak about them. All the while in France, during several revisionist trials, Jewish witnesses sometimes came to evoke the gas chambers but none of them testified before the court as to having seen one or having participated in a homicidal gassing by hauling bodies out of the ‘gas chambers’.

“Today, gas chamber witnesses are making themselves extremely scarce and the Demjanjuk trial in Israel, which once again has revealed how much false testimony is involved in the matter, has contributed to the suppression. Several years ago, it happened that I was aggressively questioned at the rear of a law court by elderly Jews who presented themselves as “living witnesses to the gas chambers of Auschwitz“, showing me their tattoos. It was necessary for me only to ask them to look me in the eyes and to describe for me a gas chamber that inevitably they retorted: “How could I do this? If I had seen a gas chamber with my own eyes I would not be here today to speak with you; I myself would have been gassed also.“”[59] (Faurisson)

The study of history cannot exist without dissenting views, and who would want to read a history journal that did not allow this? One fails to understand why ‘revisionism’ should be reprehensible, and Jews especially should be relieved to discover that their ancestors were never subject to such a horror. Bestselling author David Irving, who has written over a dozen books on WWII, was recently jailed[60]. His definitive, 700- page blockbuster Hitler’s War gave no hint that the Fuhrer ever got to hear of a gas chamber, or gave any extermination command! Irving is known for the care with which he checks out his primary-source material. In 1991 his publisher, Macmillan, destroyed all their copies of his books. Irving has paid quite a price for the truth he discovered.

In November 1991 Fred Leuchter was about to speak at Chelsea Town Hall (invited by David Irving), when he was arrested onstage by the police at the request of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, and deported back to the United States. So much for freedom of speech. When his trailblazing ‘Leuchter Report’ was first published in 1989, the House of Commons denounced it as ‘Nazi propaganda’ and a ‘fascist publication’ (on July 20th, with 100 MPs voting). Even the House of Commons, however, cannot alter the laws of chemistry: the durability of the ferrocyanide ion is now pivotal to the Holocaust debate!

We are not likely to get important insights unless the ‘thoughtcrime’ penalty is lifted from the German people, and they are allowed to review their own past. The definitive modern textbook, Dissecting the Holocaust has chapters by some twenty different authors over six hundred pages.[61] In 1995 the German Government demanded that all copies be confiscated and burnt![62] Edited by Germar Rudolf, it draws its inspiration from the pioneer labours of Ernst Zundel. While in Tennessee and publishing ‘revisionist’ material, he was seized by the police and thrown into solitary confinement in a Canadian jail[63]. After two years he was transferred to Germany, where his trial now progresses. He recently (October 2006) read to the court an open letter from the Iranian president to Germany’s chancellor – to the judge’s fury. The letter said, in effect, that Germany had been on its knees before Zion for fifty years and it was time to get up[64].

Here are conclusions which Professor Robert Faurisson (University of Lyon) has drawn:: [65]

  • that there was neither an order, nor a plan, nor a budget for the alleged genocide of the Jews;

  • that ‘Wannsee’ was at best only a “silly story“;

  • that there existed no specialist’s report on the weapon of the crime concluding that ‘the building (whether intact, “reconstructed“, or in ruins) served as a homicidal gas chamber’;

  • that there is no autopsy that would allow us to conclude: ‘This is the corpse of a deportee killed by poison gas’[66]

  • that the confession of Rudolf Höß was no longer of any value (“Höß was always a very weak and confused witness”);

  • that their alleged witnesses had probably never seen gas chambers or gassings inasmuch as the best of them, the famous Rudolf Vrba, in 1985, had been obliged to admit before a Canadian judge and jury that in his famous book on the subject he had made use of “poetic licence” or “licentia poetarum”;

  • that the “Jewish soap” had never existed;

  • that the figure of four million victims at Auschwitz was only a fiction;

  • and that from 1942 to 1945, certainly at Auschwitz, but probably overall, more Jews were killed by so-called ‘natural’ causes [starvation, disease, sickness and overwork] than by ‘unnatural’ ones.

At the recent Tehran conference, Faurisson summed up his case more succinctly –

• They cannot invoke a single document proving the crime.
• They are unable to provide the least representation of the crime weapon.
• They do not possess any proof nor even any evidence.
• They cannot name a single truthful witness[67]

Forbidden Doubt and Fictional Horror

Doubt anything in our modern world, scoff at sacred texts, no-one will care – except that one kind of doubt is forbidden to you, which will land you in jail – in ten different nations! You can read the Hammer-horror account in, e.g., Auschwitz by Lawrence Rees (2005): every hour or so, a thousand naked Jews were marched (somehow) into a room with space for maybe one or two hundred, the doors are locked, then the Zyklon-B is poured down special chutes or holes in the ceiling (which did not exist in the war, they were added later), then after the screaming stops ‘powerful fans’ remove the poison gas. In your dreams, Mr Rees. There were no such powerful fans. But, then what? The mass of bodies will be mixed up with the Zyklon-B, and that is specifically designed to keep emitting the cyanide gas slowly. How is anyone supposed to shovel out this tortured mass of corpses mixed up with poison powder? Remember there are only ordinary-sized doors, mostly opening inwards. Its an unthinkable nightmare that could not possibly have worked, and would certainly have gassed any workers trying to operate it. It is the ‘safe’ design of this insecticide material, which would have prevented it from functioning in this deliriously-imagined manner.

No German government existed after the war, that was the ‘unconditional surrender’ which the Allies demanded. By losing both its senior military staff and government, Germany was in effect decapitated – necessary for the illusory version of events to be perpetrated. The verdicts of Nuremberg were made final and binding for the post-war FRG. Germany has since paid a hundred billion Deutschmarks to Israel by way of Holocaust-compensation – clearly, that needs to be refunded. Germany should take the advice of Iranian leader Ahmadinajad and stop paying it, because that funding provides undue motivation for holocaust ‘memories.’ Germany is helping to maintain the holocaust legend,[68] by thus aiding the state of Israel.[69]

The United Nations has now established its annual Holocaust Remembrance Day on 27 January, as of 2006. On this anniversary, we all need to mull over the faking of history and the Greatest Lie Ever Told. As Perseus gazed at the Medusa only via a mirror, to avoid being petrified, to too we need calm reflection and the power of Truth to avoid our collective destruction.


[1] ‘Starting in April 1945, the United States Army and the French Army casually annihilated about one million men, most of them in the American camps,’ a part of the US-UK-Russia plan ‘to destroy Germany as a world power once and for all…’ James Bacque Other Losses London 1989 p.xix.

[3] Fred Leuchter, Auschwitz: the First Forensic Examination of Auschwitz: London, 1989; 1988, Toronto. For debate, see:

[8] In 1990 the Krakow Forensic Institute obtained somewhat lower values: their brick samples from Auschwitz ‘gas chambers’ gave a maximum of 0.6 parts per million of cyanide ––ie, hardly a trace:

[11] Dittlieb Felderer, Anne Frank’s diary a Hoax, IHR CA 1979, p.1;

[12]Did Six Million Really die? (Richard Harwood, Historical Review Press, 1975: a 30-page monograph) pp.6, 28. An official German source of June 1940 put the figure at 3 ¼ million Jews ‘in all the territories now under German control’ (i.e. it excludes Russia). W. Staeglich, Auschwitz – a Judge Looks at the Evidence’ IHR 1986, p.29.

[13] A.R.Butz, The Hoax of the 200th Century (Historical Review Press, 1977, Brighton, 2003), p.239.

Paul Rassinier ((Debunking the Genocide Myth

[15] Ibid p.240..

[16] Walter Sanning, The Dissolution of European Jewry, IHR 1983, p.27.

[17] J&D. Kimche, The Secret Roads, the “Illegal Migration of a Peoplee 1954, p.215.

[18] Ref. 16, pp.32,198.

[19] Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of “Truth” and “Memory” ed. germar rudolf, 2003, p. 216:, Ch. “Holocaust victims – A Statistical analysis.”

[21] Dissecting (ref 19), p.406.

[22] There were a network of labour camps around the small town of Auchwitz and this figure would be their total population. The gas-chamber allegations centred on the Birkenau (Auchwitz II) camp. British-intelligence estimate of 20,000 population (ref. 37) must have been for just one camp. Kramer’s statement alluded to the gassing stories: ‘All I can say is that it is untrue from beginning to end.’ Butz (ref 12), p.265.

[23] In the German endlosung, ‘end’ signifies ‘goal’ and ‘aim’, at least as much as ‘final.’

[24] The minutes of the Wannsee Conference (Berlin, 20th January 1942) provide ‘unambiguous documentary evidence that no extermination program existed:’ Butz, p.212;. For its text, see Staeglich (ref 12), Appendix I.

[25] Butz p.233.

[27] 24 March 1933:, Daily Express headline, ‘Judea declares war on Germany;’ then again, on 5th Sept 1939 (8th Sept, Jewish Chronicle) “The Israeli people around the world declare economic and financial war against Germany … holy war against Hitler’s people” declared by Chain Weizmann, Zionist leader: Six Million (ref 12) p.4; , For Those Who Cannot Speak M. McLaughlin, Historical Review Press 1979 p.17. Staeglich, p.57.

[28] On June 17th 1942, Hitler remarked: ‘One could found a state of Israel in Madagascar,’ (Six Million, p.5) suggesting that the National-Socialist ‘final solution’ was then still viewed as feasible. Many ‘Zionists’ for whom Palestine was unfeasible looked at Madagascar.

[29] Dissecting (ref. 19), p.38. n.119.

[30] Léon Poliakov, Harvest of Hate, 1979.

[32] See Butz’ discussion of this Report (ref 13), p. 142ff.

[33] Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross WW2, 1948, Vol.3.

[34] General Eisenhower may have alluded to the subject, in one paragraph: after the war he visited a ‘horror camp’ near Gotha, where he saw evidence of ‘Nazi brutality’. D. Eisenhower, Crusade in Europe, 1948, p.408.

[35] Dissecting, p.289.

[36] Irving, Nuremberg, p.188 n.16, for absence of German ‘holocaust’ documents.

[37] Steiglich, ref. 12.

[38] British Intelligence in World War Two, HMSO, 1981 F.Hinsey Ed., Vol. II, p.673.

[39] For discussion of an alleged statement by Himmler concerning extermination, see Butz (ref.13) p.193.

[40] J. C. Ball, Air Photo Evidence,

[42] Abrams, Voices from the Holocaust p.196

[43] In the Anne Frank ‘Diary’, she gets to hear in October 1942 about Jews going to gas-chambers, solely via the ‘English radio: The Diary of Anne Frank, Pan 1989, pp.43, 130; Felderer (ref. 11), p.13.

[44] The story appears in a 1944 War Refugee Board report German Extermination Camps: Auschwitz and Birkenau, Washington, Executive office of the President, the WRB being ‘an instrument of the World Jewish congress:’ Butz p.66-7; Staglich p.93-8.

[45] Butz, p.174.

[46] “The whole propaganda which started about Auschwitz abroad was initiated by us with the help of our Polish comrades… It is no exaggeration when I say that the majority of all Auschwitz propaganda, which was spread at that time all over the world, was written by ourselves in the camp….” Bruno Baum, communist’ (Dissecting, p.115).

[48] David Irving, Nuremberg the Last battle (1996): US judge Robert Jackson was initially advised of the ‘six million’ figure by influential Jews: ‘Chapter 4, The Origin of six Million.’

[49] ‘All but two of the Germans [on trial at Nuremberg], in the 139 cases that we investigated, had their testicles kicked in beyond repair. This was standard operating procedure with our American investigators:’ 23.1.49, The Sunday Pictorial (quoted in For Those Who Cannot Speak (ref. 27), p.21.

[50] Höss spoke these words to Moritz von Schirmeister in a car on his way to Nurnberg on 1st April, 1946:öss.htm. Faurisson states that Bernard Clarke, Höss’s chief torturer, was Jewish, but this is not in Butler’s book. Irving (ref 47), p.241.

[51] Rupert Butler, Legions of Death 1983, pp.237-8; Dissecting, p.96; Staeglich (ref. 12), pp.193-216.

[52] The letter is preserved: Irving, Nuremberg, p.246.

[53] Patricia Meehan, A Strange Enemy People: Germans under the British 1945-50, 2001.

[54] According to The Jewish Chronicle, the World Jewish congress ‘had secured the holding of the Nuremberg trials at which it had provided expert advice and much valuable evidence’ (16.12.49): McLaughlin, Nuremberg and other war crime Trials, Historical Review Press, 1979, p.54.

[55] For Zionists occupying top positions at the Nuremberg trials, see Butz (ref 13) p.30.

[56] Ref. (31).

[57] Rassinier (ref. 14) p.270.

[61] Ref. 19.

[63] Zundel was charged for the crime of having promoted the pamphlet Did Six Million Really die? (ref 11) This brilliant pamphlet, banned in many nations, has sold in hundreds of thousands in various languages, and let us hope it will come to be studied by every schoolchild.

[66] US forensic pathologist Dr Charles Larsen performed autopsies in 1945 at Dachau and other German labour-camps. He is quoted as saying to a newpaper in 1980: ‘There never was a case of poison gas uncovered:’ But, his biography Crime Doctor (J.D.McCallum, Canada 1979) has him saying that at Dachau ‘a relatively few of the inmates I personally examined were murdered in this manner,’ viz. by cyanide pellets: these were, he reckoned, ‘mercy killings’ only for psychotic prisoners, p.61.

[67] He found Butz’ book to be still the best one on the topic, with which one may agree. A Paris court found Faurisson guilty (February 2005) of the crime of Holocaust denial, for affirming on Iranian TV, ‘There was never a single execution gas chamber under the Germans.’ He presided over the Holocaust-re-evaluation conference at Tehran, December 2006. See his excellent lecture there given:

[68] The Six Million Reconsidered, Ed W. Grimsted, Hist. Rev. Press 1977.

Benjamin Freedman gave the speech below before a military organization in Washington, D.C..He was introduced by Col. Dall

SOB’s Grins & Grumps

Col. Curtis B. Dall:

Briefly, I will add a word or two about my old friend, Ben Freedman, I consider it an honor.I was initially introduced to him as a sort of, well you meet a fellow, but I’m not so sure about him -he may be a sort of a Trojan Horse. Well, I said, let me make up my own mind. In the years that have followed, I make up my own mind I spent many happy evenings with him and his wife, Rose, who is not with us anymore. When Ben was over twenty-five -and, as I say, he comes from a very distinguished Jewish family in New York. When Ben moved over into the areas of Christianity with Rose, it took a great deal of courage. “Guts,” is the name in the Marine Corps, for what it took. Ben has been ostracized by many of his friends for believing that this Country had objectives and ideals that did not appear in the minds of some of our alien citizens.

So, it is with great respect and honor, I say, this gentleman is a world scholar in the areas which he will touch upon. It is my great pleasure, as a member of this fine military organization, to present the honorable Benjamin Freedman, of New York.

Benjamin Freedman:

I am very honored to be here. I don’t know how to start to thank Col. Dall for making it possible for me to address you. But I hope that things work out so that you will feel grateful to him. And if you will try to make a little use of the information I can give you, you may be very helpful in saving this country from the fate which has befallen Great Britain and, maybe the Soviet Union (Czarist Russia). We are in a very serious state at the present time. I’ve just returned, within the last four weeks, from an extended trip in what is known as The Middle East. I am very friendly with the heads of the government, the rulers who know me for 25-30 years, who talk to me and treat me, as a brother. I stay with them at their homes, and we call each other by our first names.Now, all I can tell you is that what I am going to tell you may not make you feel any more comfortable. But the less comfortable you are after hearing me, the more chance you will exert whatever influence you can to save this country from a fate it doesn’t deserve. After the men I see here get to know their records, what they have done to pull us out of the ditch, once, maybe twice, I don’t think it’s fair to these men to see us now, dragged down into the sewer of history – which is where we are bound to go, if things deteriorate – that really is not the word, – if things degenerate at a more rapid pace than they have been degenerating the last ten or fifteen years.

Now, before I make this talk, I would like to call your attention to one thing. I am going to use a word, you hear the word, you read the word, and you use the word, Jew, as though it is something that could be weighed and felt, has a background. I’m going to use that word, although I never use it in my own personal affairs or in my private life. Now, I want to explain that Dr. Samuel Johnson wrote the first English Dictionary in 1797. That’s only a few years from 1800, which isn’t so very long ago! It consists of two thick volumes. And it has possibly every word that was then used in the English language. I have shown that to many important people in all walks of life, and they were amazed, because when I told them what I am going to tell you now, they didn’t believe me. So I acquired these two books – cost a little money. They’re first editions, rare!

In that book, in those two volumes, the first English dictionary ever published by Dr. Samuel Johnson, (about whom, many of you know) the word, Jew, does not appear! The word, Jew, does not appear! That word was coined, forced on you, stuffed down your throats by control of all the media by the people who are interested in leading you to slaughter. The word, Jew, did not appear. They say Shakespeare used it. They cite all the people who used it. It did not exist. I don’t want to go into that, now. I don’t want to give you a discourse in philology. We have something more important. But I am going to talk about that word, use it; but I want you to know that I never accepted it, and more than, let’s say, the people who refer to artificial silk. Well, artificial silk has certain handicaps. I imported it, when it first came out. It was made in Germany, and it was called artificial silk. And it had a repercussion. People didn’t like to buy something that was artificial anything. So the manufacturers got together and they awarded $25,000 as a prize to anyone who could get up a good word to use instead of the word artificial silk. That prize was won by somebody who coined the word, “rayon.” Today, people talk about rayon as though it existed from the beginning of the world, as though it always existed. “Rayon” is a modern word and the man who coined it was paid $25,000.

The word, “Jew,” was coined for a purpose by the people who got us into two wars, who laid a trap to get us into a third one, and who have practically taken over the control of the world, especially the control of this country according to Senator Fulbright and others. So it’s about time that you learned the basics and did something about it. I am certain that, unless something is done to change the thinking of the 200,000,000 U.S.A. Christians, that this country is headed for disaster! There are 200,000,000 Christians in this country who have been brain-washed, from morning to night, by radio, press, television, motion pictures, every media – the mass information has been used to deceive you into believing things that they knew were deliberate lies and part of their scheme to brainwash you. One of them is the word, Jew!

Now, in the Middle East, you know the situation. The United States has been supplying, since the end of World War II, 32 billion dollars of the taxpayer’s money. 95% of that 32 billion dollars was used by the Congress of the United States, after you paid that money into the Treasury, to make the United States the accomplice, the ally, of thieves and murderers; to aid and abet them to hold on to their stolen loot -territory that they acquired by invading Palestine and driving the indigenous population out of the country that they had inhabited for 2,000 years!

Now you were taught by the Christians; you are taught by your ministers, by your priests, (and Dr. Ellson, here, God bless him, knows how I’ve been fighting, and he did as much as he could, over the years, to make it possible for me to succeed) . . . You have been told that it is your Christian duty to help repatriate God’s Chosen People to their promised land. You have been told that by every media of mass information, including the pulpit, including every other means by which they can shape your thinking: “That it is your Christian duty to help repatriate God’s Chosen People to their promised land.”

Now, I’ll tell you what a lie that is! I can cite the sources here that I’ve consulted, maybe 234 official documents, maps, books, and other records, but the best is one that I found in the last few years, The Encyclopedia Britannica, the 1911 Edition, Volume 15, three pages, define the word “Khazar.” Three pages! Now, that book was published in 1911, in London, and it probably took twenty-five years (whoever compiled that information) to accumulate it. It’s the research of many people. Many of the sources of information are mentioned at the end of the article. But you will find that the Khazars were an Asian nation; they were a Mongoloid, Turko-Finn tribal nation in Asia. And they had so much trouble with the other nations there, who finally succeeded in driving them out of Asia, across the border, into what is known today as Russia, in the area of the Ukraine. They found, there, a lot of peaceful agricultural people, mostly Slavic, and they conquered them. They did the same thing then as they are still doing in the Middle East! They took them, for no reason at all, except the people weren’t trained to fight! They established there, the Khazar Kingdom.

Now, those three pages in that Encyclopedia Britannica, Vol. 15, the 1911 Edition tells you who they are, how war-like, how savage, how barbarian they are, and that they succeeded in sweeping across Europe to the gates of Paris, and to Finland. They controlled all Europe – these Mongols known as Khazars! They did that from maybe the fourth century to the ninth century. And they were the most brutal people. They enslaved these people and exacted tribute from them, while holding them under their control – practically all Europe. Until in the 8th century, a man by the name of Rurik. a Varengian, who came from across the water, from what is known today as Sweden, – he organized these people. They were living as people interested in agriculture. They didn’t want any politics, they didn’t want nations or governments. But he saw what they were subject to, this treatment by their Khazar conquerors. And he organized the principality of Rokh, which became the Russian Empire. He organized them, and started to drive these Khazars back. And he finally succeeded to where they came into Europe for the first time, in the area of the Ukraine, where they continued their Khazar Kingdom.

Now, they were Phallic Worshipers. Anyone who doesn’t know what Phallic worship means, I am not going to go into detail, but they were Phallic worshipers and they were so degenerate that when the king, their ruler, heard that there were such things as monotheistic forms of religious belief, (Christianity, Islam, Judaism) he sent for representatives of the three of them, and asked them to tell him the merits of their faith. And after listening to them, like a child would play “Eenie, Meenie, Minie, Mo” to pick out the one that they favored, he listened to the three of them, and said, “I’m going to become a Jew and adopt the religion known today as Judaism.”

So, he compelled his entire nation, (which at the time had a population of maybe 18 or 20 million people, and extended to the heart of Europe), they had to become members of that religious belief. He sent to two Talmudic centers in the Holy Land, and he brought up religious leaders, (whether you call them rabbis, or what, it makes no difference). And he compelled the 4,000 nobles (they had a feudal system) to adopt that faith and it became the official faith. They built thousands of schools and so-called temples, or places of worship. That is how the people of Eastern Europe became what we know today as Jews.

I have with me, now, a circular that I received in the mail last week, the March of Dimes put it out with the assistance of the Rockefeller Foundation, and they recite the whole thing; because they have found, in recent years, that the Khazars are carriers of a disease that no other people in the world have. Here’s the circular that they got out. It’s called, “Kasak Disease” (The Jewish Disease – Tay-Sachs). I have known about it for years. The New York News newspaper had a full page on it, called “The Jewish Disease.” They explained the whole thing, so I went into it, investigated it, and gave a little money to one or two clinics that were trying to do something about it. The Eastern Europeans, of Khazar ancestry, known as Jews, are carriers of this Kasak disease. When one Khazar marries another Khazar: (I don’t say so, Mt. Sinai Hospital, the Jewish Memorial Hospital, the Rockefeller Foundation, they’ve all done a lot of work on it. They published these figures and these statistics . . .) that one out of four children, when one Khazar marries another Khazar, or of that ancestry, that child can’t live beyond three years. And the death that that child suffers is too miserable to describe to you. Out of the others, two of them become carriers, and one is clear.

Now I have maintained, after listening for twenty-six years to every meeting of the United Nations… (I attend, and I sit there, and I hear these representatives of the so-called State of Israel, talk) . . . I’ve been saying for many years, before I even knew about this, – they must be crazy! How can they say those things before the representatives of 131 other nations? How can they say that? Have they no shame? But, I found out they are suffering from this disease.

So then, to sit there, and tell the world, officially, in the United Nations, that they are God’s Chosen People, and that it is the Christian’s duty to repatriate them to their homeland, when they know who they are –

Now, those are the people that again went on the war-path, and they are now up to their old tricks and have been, because after this Russian Empire expanded, they conquered the Khazar Kingdom, and incorporated the people and the territory in the Russian Empire, and the so-called Jews in Russia, who were then the orthodox Jews, we’ll call them, . . . Russia had become a Catholic country, under Vladimir the 3rd, in 986 . . . they couldn’t get together on anything. Now, what happened? They have been at war ever since. And after the 11th century, when they were conquered, they pledged that they would never accept that conquest, that they would keep on organizing and revolting to again declare their independence and set up their Khazar Kingdom. That was in the 11th century! They have been fighting the Czarist regime, ever since, and I don’t want to go into detail, but I can give you plenty on that subject, and no one can deny it, because I can give you chapter and verse of hundreds of books, maps that I’ve taken, had photostated, all over the world, in the public libraries and museums. Now, you have these people, organized, and all of a sudden, something developed. The last revolt that they started was in 1905. According to the Encyclopedia Britannica, under the word, Bolshevism, one of the five rules for their revolt was: Never start until the armies of the country are engaged otherwise. And in 1905, when Russia was at war with Japan, in the Far East, they started their last revolt, – and they were slapped down, like every other one since the 11th century.

That’s where I come into the picture. – I wasn’t alive in the 11th century, though! But, what I am trying to tell you, though, is that in 1905 they took this terrible licking, like, here.

So, we had a President in Washington, Mr. Taft, Mr. Jacob Schiff, of Kuhn, Loeb & Co., the bankers in New York who are the arm in the United States of the Rothschild International world wide plutocracy – Mr. Schiff, with two young men, went down to see Mr. Taft, and he said, “Mr. Taft, . . . (I am not telling you this out of my memory. I almost know this by heart, because the books are here, in the Congressional Library. The people who were in the room with President Taft, at that time, and President Taft were told by Jacob H. Schiff) . . . “We want you to cancel the Most Favored Nation Treaty with Czarist Russia, and we want you to recall our Ambassador.” The President told them, “Mr. Schiff, things are not what you represent them to be. My ambassador tells me differently.” So, Mr. Schiff told him, in so many words, “Is you is, or is you ain’t – going to do it?” When the President said that he would not do it, Mr. Schiff said “We will put a political party and a president in Washington, to whom we can dictate what they should do.”

Jacob Schiff came back to New York (He was at that time head of The American Jewish Committee), and in my father’s home (I was a young man then), in the presence of many prominent men some of whom you’ve heard the names of, he retold the story and I looked at the books in the Public Library, Memoirs of men who were in the room at that time, names that are familiar to many people that are here. That is a -fact. Now, what happened?

They ganged up in New York, to get rid of Taft. I was a protégé of Mr. Bernard Baruch – a name that I think you are all familiar with. His father was a doctor, Dr. Simon Baruch, who had brought me into the world, and Bernard Baruch was a visitor at our home all the time. He courted my sister; one of my sisters. So the stage was set to get rid of the Republican Party and the Republican President and put in their own party and their own President. But it was very difficult, because, after the Cleveland depression (President Cleveland was a Democrat, we had Free Trade) we had the worst depression ever seen anywhere. And that swept the Republican Party into power, because they advocated tariff, protective tariff to protect the working man against the cheap labor of Europe and to protect the infant industries, in the United States against foreign competition.

Mr. Schiff went down there and had this conversation, came back to New York and the stage was set. And I, as a young man, got into the act. What I am telling you now, I saw with my own eyes, heard with my own ears, but I make it brief. The stage was set: “How can we get rid of the Republican Party; how can we get rid of Taft” – and Mr. Baruch was picked out as the leg man. He was a smart man!

They set up the National Democratic Headquarters at 200 Fifth Avenue, which was the site of the old Fifth Avenue Hotel, now an office building, and Mr. Henry Morgenthau, Sr., the old man, the father of the one you all know, was made chairman of the Finance Committee. I was made his confidential assistant in liaison with the Treasurer, who was Mr. Rollo Wells of St. Louis, – the Andrew Mellon of his time. And I was right in the middle! I saw everything that went on, because I handled all the books that had the cash contributions in them. Mr. Jacob Schiff and the Jews (use that word as I told you, with reservations) put up the money to launch this Party, and they looked around for a man to put up as President. To make a long story short, because the details aren’t very interesting, they got Woodrow Wilson, a rascal who wasn’t worth the powder to blow him to hell!

They got Woodrow Wilson, the man who had more ego than any man I have ever read about, they got him to head the Democratic Party. And they got into difficulties! Because the Democrats only got the Electoral votes in the South; where the people in agriculture wanted cheap goods from Europe. But the North wanted the Republicans. They found out they could not elect a President in the United States. So, I handled the money; I was the leg man, the errand boy (I was only a boy then.) They trotted Theodore Roosevelt out of the political “moth-balls” (He was then an editor of a magazine). They told him, “You are the indispensable man. You are the only man who can save the United States.” And with his ego they formed the “Bull Moose Party” and Mr. Jacob H. Schiff and the Jews throughout the world – they got plenty of money from England – they formed the Bull Moose Party. And in that way they split the Republican vote between Roosevelt and Taft, and Mr. Wilson walked in with a minority of the popular vote – the lowest man, (and I knew the inside of his private life, which I don’t want to go into here). But never was a lower rascal in the White House, and I’ve known plenty of them since that time!

Now, Mr. Wilson really didn’t know enough to come in out of the rain! I cannot understand how he ever got there, except that in shuffling the cards, they had the goods on him, You find in politics, every time they pick a candidate, and put him out in front, they have the goods on him. You know he had been sleeping with the wife of the professor who lived next door to him at Princeton, whose name was Peck. And they used to call Wilson, at Princeton, “Peck’s bad boy.” When she got a divorce and moved to Washington, she married a man who had a son. And that son borrowed $40,000 from the bank, without asking them. He didn’t know how to pay it back, and the pressure on him was getting very, very hot. So this woman heard of Samuel Untermeyer (of the big firm, Googenheim, Untermeyer and Marshall) a prominent Democrat; and supplied much money to the party. She went to him with a big package of letters which I read (Wilson was a great letter writer. He knew the language; there’s no doubt about it, Wilson knew his vocabulary, when it came to making love, anyway). So, they cooked this up and she got the idea of blackmailing him. She got Samuel Untermeyer to go to see him, as a lawyer. He was a big contributor to the Party and he knew Wilson, and he went there. To make a long story short, Wilson didn’t have the money; Untermeyer provided it, and the boy paid the money back.

Now, Mr. Untermeyer told President Wilson, “I’ll advance that money if you will do one favor for me. The next opening on the Supreme Court, I want to name the man.” He said, “We’ve never had a Jew on the Supreme Court I think there ought to be a Jew on the Supreme Court.” So Wilson said, ”It’s a deal!” and they paid the $40,000. When a vacancy appeared on the Supreme Court, Mr. Untermeyer recommended Mr. Brandeis. Mr. Brandeis was the number one Zionist in the United States; the head of them all, and he became very friendly with Wilson. And when the war with Germany broke out, the war between England, France, Russia, and Germany and Austria, the United States had nothing to do with it. They all thought England, France and Russia would crush Germany in 60 days. Big headlines in all the papers. I was very active then, in politics, “Boys home by Christmas, Boys out of the trenches by Christmas,” but when Christmas came, the war was getting hot!

The Germans had brought out the submarines, and the Irish gave them two bases on the coast of Ireland, and they were sinking everything that brought food and ammunition to England, which under International Law is correct. Now, when they saw that Great Britain was going to lose the war, the Jews were very much excited, because, up to that time, Germany was their best friend.

In 1822, Germany passed the Emancipation Edict which gave everybody in Germany equal rights; no religious discrimination. Up to that time, every country in Europe had quotas: l%, 2%, 3% to become a doctor, a dentist, a lawyer, a banker, a schoolteacher, anything. Germany, in 1822 passed that Emancipation Edict and all the Jews across Europe rushed to Germany, because they could get an education. They could become doctors, lawyers, dentists, druggists. So, when I was in Germany, 50% of the pupils in German schools were Jews from all over Europe. They all ran to Germany. And they worshiped the Germans

Baline, a Jew, was the head of the Hamburg-American, North German-Lloyd lines. Even the private bankers, the Hohenzollerns, were Jews. The head of the German General Electric Company was a Jew. The biggest companies, – there was no discrimination at all, in Germany. And the Jews had a picnic there, but they were not the Khazars! They were so-called Jews that came into Western Europe with the Roman armies; that came from Judea when the Romans occupied Western Europe, and there were two houses of worship, one in Speyer, one in Lyons, little stone houses, in the second century, which was 600 years before the Khazars were converted. So the German Jews were just as much apart as the Arabs and the Khazars, today, in fact, there was a saying, I don’t know if I can say it in this company, but when I lived in Germany, the Germans said about the Pollocks – (they called them “the Pollocks,” the Eastern European Jews), “Where a Pollock pisses, grass will never grow.” They hated them! They could never allow their children to marry. So, when Germany was winning the war, the Jews were very happy, because they didn’t want Russia to come out the winner, with France and England, because they thought it would be tougher for the Jews in Russia. So, they were all pro-German. What happened? When the Germans trotted out the submarines, – England in August or September, I don’t remember just which week, but General Haig, in London, warned the English, “We have less than two week’s food supply for the whole nation of 55,000,000 people.” The food and ammunition boats were sunk so quickly, they couldn’t get food or ammunition.

So, England was offered a Peace Treaty by Germany. They were offered a Peace Treaty twice! It was on the desk of the British War Cabinet, ready to be signed. It needed only one signature. What happened? The Khazar Jews in New York, Washington, led by Brandeis, made this promise through Fleischman & Sockloff in London. They went to the British War Cabinet and they said, “You don’t have to make peace – which is tantamount to surrender. We can show you how you can win the war, if, when you defeat Germany, and carve up the Ottoman Empire (or Turkey) you will give us Palestine. And they made that deal. It was all written. I don’t say so; Other people don’t say so. The Zionists, in the books that they have written, tell this whole story. How they got the promise of Palestine, by promising to use their influence to get U.S. into the war. That’s how they are going to turn against the United States; the same way they turned against Germany; after everything Germany did for them, since 1822. They made the deal to bring the United States into the war, which meant certain defeat for Germany; which was triumphant, then; offering a peace that was tantamount to surrender.

So, when that offer was made, the Zionists in London went to the British War Cabinet, according to their own books, their own record, in the British Museum. I circulated thousands of copies of this 12 page memorandum by the man who negotiated it. When they were bombing London in 1945, he thought he’d die. And he typed this out, this true story, and gave it to the British Museum for posterity. That’s available. Anyone can have a copy of it. I sent out thousands, – maybe ten thousands of them.

Now, the United States got into World War I. How did they get in? They didn’t know how to get us in, because the Germans leaned backwards. They said, “We are going to do nothing on land, on the sea, or in the air, to provoke or justify a declaration of war by the United States, because we’ll be licked! Now, we’ve won the war!” Which they had. The Russian armies were in retreat; in France, the army had revolted, and wouldn’t fight. There was no more fight left in the allies. So, what happened?

They went to Great Britain; made this offer; Great Britain accepted it. Then the question came, How to get U.S. into the war? They couldn’t get us in if the Germans didn’t give us provocation or justification. So, what did they do? A message was sent to Washington, that the S.S. Sussex, a ferry from Dover to Calais, had been torpedoed in the Channel and 38 Americans lost their lives! I’m not going to string this out, because I’ve got a lot of other things to tell you!

On the basis of the torpedoing, and the loss of 38 lives of our citizens, Congress declared war against Germany. Now, after the 4,000,000 men that General Pershing had been drilling, were on their way over, some of them fighting in Europe – (a lot of you, here, went over, were fighting while this fighting was going on) a member of Parliament and others, who couldn’t stand it any longer, they came out with the secret that the Sussex was not sunk and no Americans lives were lost. And we were in the war! Now that is how the Jews got us into World War I, and that started everything because Wilson was elected. We had a national debt of one billion dollars. And since then it has gone up – I think it’s now 465 billion, after the wars we’ve been having, so that’s how the Jews got us into World War I.

I knew Judge Samuel Rosen who was Mr. Roosevelt’s mentor. They used to say that he didn’t go to the water closet without consulting Judge Rosen. I was very friendly (here’s somebody who will bear me out) – Now, when it came to World War II, we couldn’t get into the war because the Germans said, “When the Americans came into World War I, look what happened to us!” So there was war in Europe again, Germany and European countries, and there was no way to get us into the war. And the pressure of the Jews here, in New York City, Washington, to get into that war was terrific! They didn’t know how to do it. So, as Mr. Tanzell wrote in his “Back Door to War,” (he was at Georgetown University, a professor of history) – I saw, in the Yale Library, the papers of the Secretary of Defense at that time – we were pushed into World War II by Mr. Roosevelt, through the back door! Germany would give us no justification or provocation. But the Jews, here, were putting pressure on Roosevelt, “We’ve got to get into that war! We can’t let him do that to us!”

We had to make up our minds what to do, so the United States sent to Japan, and they said, “We can’t sell you any more scrap steel or oil.” Japan was fighting a war with China; Without scrap steel or oil, which they got altogether from the United States, they would have to withdraw from the war. So they sent nine different Ambassador here, trying to change Mr. Roosevelt’s mind. Ile said, “No, we can’t sell you any more, at all.” So, at that time, Germany and Japan had a treaty; Any country that declared war on either one was instantly at war with both! So, Mr. Roosevelt figured, “We’ll provoke a war with Japan.” That’s why he threatened them to cut off steel and oil. So they sent nine ambassadors here, and, finally, they couldn’t take it much longer, so you know what happened at Pearl Harbor!

Now, Mr. Roosevelt figured, and it’s in Mr. Stimson’s diary, in his own handwriting, which is in the room at Yale Library containing all Mr. Henry L. Stimson’s papers – he was the Secretary of Defense. He wrote in his diary important things that went on (in his own handwriting) and under November 25th, two weeks before Pearl Harbor, he wrote, “The President sent for us to come to the White House. I thought it was to discuss the war in Europe, but he told us that we had to be at war with Japan but he didn’t want it to look as if we fired the first shot!” That is almost verbatim. Henry Stimson, the Secretary of Defense wrote that in his diary. That is how we got into the World War, because Roosevelt said, “We want to be at war with Japan, but we don’t want it to look as though we fired the first shot”! So we got the first shot, alright, at Pearl Harbor! But, the only way we could be at war with Germany was to be at war with Japan. Then automatically, under their treaty, we were at war with Germany. That’s how we got into World War II.

We are now on our way to World War III. The chances are it will be a nuclear war. There is that chance, and I’ve been fighting, (some time and money) so that the conditions would not be set for that. Now, what happened. The Chairman of Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Mr. Fulbright, stated on Sunday morning television program, which according to the advertising services has 28 million listeners; he said, in answer to a question about the Middle East, he said, “You cannot do anything about the Middle East!” He said, “The Senate is controlled by the Jews; 90% of them have subverted the United States Senate, and you cannot do anything” – or words to that affect.

Now, the Chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee of the United States, throws in the sponge, says that 90% of the Senate are controlled by the Jews, meaning the Zionists. So, you may now expect the worst! The only way it can be averted, if it can be avoided, is to alert yourself to these facts. All these lies that you’ve been told, “That it’s your Christian duty to help repatriate “God’s Chosen People” to their “Promised Land,” is a lot of hog wash. And we are going to be in another war unless you people and others like you wake up the 200,000,000 Christians in this country who have been so brainwashed that they don’t know whether they are coming or going! They are running around in circles All you hear is “Jesus was a Jew!” I’ve told you now that the word didn’t exist when Dr. Johnson wrote the dictionary, and I’ve done all the research on it. It never existed! And then, again, there is the Father here, who will bear witness. Pontius Pilate wrote on the crucifix on which our Lord and Savior was to be crucified, “Jesu Nasarenus Rex Iudoreum” which, translated, anybody that has had one year of Latin, knows that means “Jesus, the Nazarene, the Leader of the Judeans.” “Leader of the Judeans,” the genitive plural and “Rex” comes from “Rego” – “To lead.”

“Now, they were trying to “frame” our Lord and Savior, claiming that he was influencing the people not to pay taxes so that gold couldn’t be shipped to Caesar. And that constituted rebellion. That’s why the trial was held, and that’s why Pontius Pilate put that up on the crucifix, “Leader of the Judeans” who were revolting against Rome. Now we all know everyone of you heard, hundreds of times, that at this trial, Jesus said, “Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar’s, and unto God that which is God’s.” He was not advising the people to withhold taxes paid to Rome. So, you see, you, as representatives, and high representatives of the 200,000,000 Christians in the United States, have got to learn the facts.

As I was talking, here, to one of your erudite members, it’s alright to be interested in baseball and basketball and football and golf, cross-word puzzles – I don’t know how many hundreds of millions of hours a year was wasted by women doing crossword puzzles! It satisfies their ego to say, “Oh, Minnie, I got all but two words, yesterday!” And they compete with one another. They spend hours, buy dictionaries, and they don’t know the first thing about the correct facts of existence. Now, we didn’t ask to come into the world; neither did our children, but we owe them a debt. We owe a debt to these men who sacrificed their lives to save this country, so let’s see what we can do.

Click here to listen to Benjamin Freedman’s Speech

Click Here to download Benjamin Freedman’s speech


Benjamin H. Freedman was one of the most intriguing and amazing individuals of the 20th century. Born in 1890, he was a successful Jewish businessman of New York City at one time principal owner of the Woodbury Soap Company. He broke with organized Jewry after the Judeo-Communist victory of 1945, and spent the remainder of his life and the great preponderance of his considerable fortune, at least 2.5 million dollars, exposing the Jewish tyranny which has enveloped the United States.

Mr. Freedman knew what he was talking about because he had been an insider at the highest levels of Jewish organizations and Jewish machinations to gain power over our nation. Mr. Freedman was personally acquainted with Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy, John F. Kennedy, and many more movers and shakers of our times. The Willard Hotel, Washington, D.C., speech was given before a patriotic, Christian audience (NOT before Nazis as some have suggested) in 1961 on behalf of Conde McGinley’s patriotic newspaper of that time, Common Sense.

Though in some minor ways this wide-ranging and extemporaneous speech has become dated, Mr. Freedman’s essential message to us — his warning to the West — is more urgent than ever before.


Transcript of Freedman’s Speech

Ladies and gentlemen, you are about to hear a very frightening speech. This
speech is an explanation of the plans now being laid to throw the United
States into a third world war. It was made a short time ago before a large
group in the Congressional `Room of the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C.
Both the speech and the question and answer period later so electrified the
audience that a group of patriots has transferred it to two long-playing
records to play for friends, clubs, and your church group in your community.
The speaker is Mr. Benjamin Freedman, noted authority on Zionism and all
of its schemes. Mr. Freedman is a former Jew, and I mean a FORMER Jew.
He has fought the Communist world conspiracy tooth and nail, and stands
today as a leading American patriot. We now take you to the speaker’s
platform to present Benjamin Freedman.
[Freedman’s speech]
What I intend to tell you tonight is something that you have never been able
to learn from any other source, and what I tell you now concerns not only
you, but your children and the survival of this country and Christianity. I’m
not here just to dish up a few facts to send up your blood pressure, but I’m
here to tell you things that will help you preserve what you consider the
most sacred things in the world: the liberty, and the freedom, and the right
to live as Christians, where you have a little dignity, and a little right to
pursue the things that your conscience tells you are the right things, as
Now, first of all, I’d like to tell you that on August 25th 1960 — that was
shortly before elections — Senator Kennedy, who is now the President of the
United States, went to New York, and delivered an address to the Zionist
Organization of America. In that address, to reduce it to its briefest form,
he stated that he would use the armed forces of the United States to preserve
the existence of the regime set up in Palestine by the Zionists who are now
in occupation of that area.
In other words, Christian boys are going to be yanked out of their homes,
away from their families, and sent abroad to fight in Palestine against the
Christian and Moslem Arabs who merely want to return to their homes. And
these Christian boys are going to be asked to shoot to kill these innocent
[Arab Palestinians] people who only want to follow out fifteen resolutions
passed by the United Nations in the last twelve years calling upon the
Zionists to allow these people to return to their homes.
Now, when United States troops appear in the Middle East to fight with the
Zionists as their allies to prevent the return of these people who were evicted
from their homes in the 1948 armed insurrection by the Zionists who were
transplanted there from Eastern Europe… when that happens, the United
States will trigger World War III.
You say, when will that take place? The answer is, as soon as the difficulty
between France and Algeria has been settled, that will take place. As soon as
France and Algeria have been settled, that will take place. As soon as France
and Algeria have settled their difficulty, and the Arab world, or the Moslem
world, has no more war on their hands with France, they are going to move
these people back into their homes, and when they do that and President
kennedy sends your sons to fight over there to help the crooks hold on to
what they stole from innocent men, women and children, we will trigger
World War III; and when that starts you can be sure we cannot emerge from
that war a victor. We are going to lose that war because there is not one
nation in the world that will let one of their sons fight with us for such a
I know and speak to these ambassadors in Washington and the United
Nations — and of the ninety-nine nations there, I’ve consulted with maybe
seventy of them –and when we go to war in Palestine to help the thieves
retain possession of what they have stolen from these innocent people we’re
not going to have a man there to fight with us as our ally.
And who will these people have supporting them, you ask. Well, four days
after President Kennedy — or he was then Senator Kennedy — made that
statement on August 28, 1960, the Arab nations called a meeting in Lebanon
and there they decided to resurrect, or reactivate, the government of
Palestine, which has been dormant more or less, since the 1948 armed
insurrection by the Zionists.
Not only that… they ordered the creation of the Palestine Army, and they are
now drilling maybe a half a million soldiers in that area of the world to lead
these people back to theirhomeland. With them, they have as their allies all
the nations of what is termed the Bandung Conference Group. That includes
the Soviet Union and every Soviet Union satellite. It includes Red China; it
includes every independent country in Asia and Africa; or eighty percent of
the world’s total population. Eighty percent of the world’s population. Four
out of five human beings on the face of the earth will be our enemies at war
with us. And not alone are they four out of five human beings now on the
face of this earth, but they are the non-Christian population of the world and
they are the non-Caucasians… the non-white nations of the world, and that’s
what we face.
And what is the reason ? The reason is that here in the United States, the
Zionists and their co-religionists have complete control of our government.
For many reasons too many and too complex to go into here at this — time
I’ll be glad to answer questions, however, to support that statement — the
Zionists and their co-religionists rule this United States as though they were
the absolute monarchs of this country.
Now, you say, ‘well, that’s a very broad statement to make’, but let me show
what happened while you were — I don’t want to wear that out — let me
show what happened while WE were all asleep. I’m including myself with
you. We were all asleep. What happened ?
World War I broke out in the summer of 1914. Nineteen-hundred and
fourteen was the year in which World War One broke out. There are few
people here my age who remember that. Now that war was waged on one
side by Great Britain, France, and Russia; and on the other side by Germany,
Austria-Hungary, and Turkey. What happened ?
Within two years Germany had won that war: not alone won it nominally,
but won it actually. The German submarines, which were a surprise to the
world, had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean, and Great Britain
stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, stood there with one week’s
food supply facing her — and after that, starvation.
At that time, the French army had mutinied. They lost 600,000 of the flower
of French youth in the defense of Verdun on the Somme. The Russian army
was defecting. They were picking up their toys and going home, they didn’t
want to play war anymore, they didn’t like the Czar. And the Italian army
had collapsed.
Now Germany — not a shot had been fired on the German soil. Not an
enemy soldier had crossed the border into Germany. And yet, here was
Germany offering England peace terms. They offered England a negotiated
peace on what the lawyers call a status quo ante basis. That means: “Let’s
call the war off, and let everything be as it was before the war started.”
Well, England, in the summer of 1916 was considering that. Seriously !
They had no choice. It was either accepting this negotiated peace that
Germany was magnanimously offering them, or going on with the war and
being totally defeated.
While that was going on, the Zionists in Germany, who represented the
Zionists from Eastern Europe, went to the British War Cabinet and — I am
going to be brief because this is a long story, but I have all the documents to
prove any statement that I make if anyone here is curious, or doesn’t believe
what I’m saying is at all possible — the Zionists in London went to the
British war cabinet and they said: “Look here. You can yet win this war.
You don’t have to give up. You don’t have to accept the negotiated peace
offered to you now by Germany. You can win this war if the United States
will come in as your ally.”
The United States was not in the war at that time. We were fresh; we were
young; we were rich; we were powerful. They [Zionists] told England: “We
will guarantee to bring the United States into the war as your ally, to fight
with you on your side, if you will promise us Palestine after you win the
In other words, they made this deal: ” We will get the United States into this
war as your ally. The price you must pay us is Palestine after you have won
the war and defeated Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey.”
Now England had as much right to promise Palestine to anybody, as the
United States would have to promise Japan to Ireland for any reason
whatsoever. It’s absolutely absurd that Great Britain — that never had any
connection or any interest or any right in what is known as Palestine —
should offer it as coin of the realm to pay the Zionists for bringing the
United States into the war.
However, they made that promise, in October of 1916. October, nineteen
hundred and sixteen. And shortly after that — I don’t know how many here
remember it — the United States, which was almost totally pro-German —
totally pro-German — because the newspapers here were controlled by Jews,
the bankers were Jews, all the media of mass communications in this country
were controlled by Jews, and they were pro-German because their people, in
the majority of cases came from Germany, and they wanted to see Germany
lick the Czar.
The Jews didn’t like the Czar, and they didn’t want Russia to win this war. So
the German bankers — the German-Jews — Kuhn Loeb and the other big
banking firms in the United States refused to finance France or England to
the extent of one dollar. They stood aside and they said: &”As long as
France and England are tied up with Russia, not one cent ! ” But they poured
money into Germany, they fought with Germany against Russia, trying to
lick the Czarist regime.
Now those same Jews, when they saw the possibility of getting Palestine,
they went to England and they made this deal. At that time, everything
changed, like the traffic light that changes from red to green. Where the
newspapers had been all pro-German, where they’d been telling the people
of the difficulties that Germany was having fighting Great Britain
commercially and in other respects, all of a sudden the Germans were no
good. They were villains. They were Huns. They were shooting Red Cross
nurses. They were cutting off babies’ hands. And they were no good.
Well, shortly after that, Mr. Wilson declared war on Germany.
The Zionists in London sent these cables to the United States, to Justice
Brandeis: “Go to work on President Wilson. We’re getting from England
what we want. Now you go to work, and you go to work on President
Wilson and get the United States into the war.” And that did happen. That’s
how the United States got into the war. We had no more interest in it; we
had no more right to be in it than we have to be on the moon tonight instead
of in this room.
Now the war — World War One — in which the United States participated
had absolutely no reason to be our war. We went in there — we were
railroaded into it — if I can be vulgar, we were suckered into — that war
merely so that the Zionists of the world could obtain Palestine. Now, that is
something that the people in the United States have never been told. They
never knew why we went into World War One. Now, what happened ?
After we got into the war, the Zionists went to Great Britain and they said:
“Well, we performed our part of the agreement. Let’s have something in
writing that shows that you are going to keep your bargain and give us
Palestine after you win the war.” Because they didn’t know whether the war
would last another year or another ten years. So they started to work out a
receipt. The receipt took the form of a letter, and it was worded in very
cryptic language so that the world at large wouldn’t know what it was all
about. And that was called the Balfour Declaration.
the Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain’s promise to pay the
Zionists what they had agreed upon as a consideration for getting the United
States into the war. So this great Balfour Declaration, that you hear so much
about, is just as phony as a three dollar bill. And I don’t think I could make it
more emphatic than that.
Now, that is where all the trouble started. The United States went in the war.
The United States crushed Germany. We went in there, and it’s history. You
know what happened. Now, when the war was ended, and the Germans went
to Paris, to the Paris Peace Conference in 1919, there were 117 Jews there,
as a delegation representing the Jews, headed by Bernard Baruch. I was
there: I ought to know. Now what happened ?
The Jews at that peace conference, when they were cutting up Germany and
parceling out Europe to all these nations that claimed a right to a certain part
of European territory, the Jews said, ?How about Palestine for us?? And
they produced, for the first time to the knowledge of the Germans, this
Balfour Declaration. So the Germans, for the first time realized, ?Oh, that
was the game! That’s why the United States came into the war.? And the
Germans for the first time realized that they were defeated, they suffered this
terrific reparation that was slapped onto them, because the Zionists wanted
Palestine and they were determined to get it at any cost.
Now, that brings us up to another very interesting point. When the Germans
realized this, they naturally resented it. Up to that time, the Jews had never
been better off in any country in the world than they had been in Germany.
You had Mr. Rathenau there, who was maybe 100 times as important in
industry and finance as is Bernard Baruch in this country. You had Mr.
Balin, who owned the two big steamship lines, the North German Lloyd’s
and the Hamburg-American Lines. You had Mr. Bleichroder, who was the
banker for the Hohenzollern family. You had the Warburgs in Hamburg,
who were the big merchant bankers — the biggest in the world. The Jews
were doing very well in Germany. No question about that. Now, the
Germans felt: ?Well, that was quite a sellout.?
It was a sellout that I can best compare — suppose the United States was at
war today with the Soviet Union. And we were winning. And we told the
Soviet Union: “Well, let’s quit. We offer you peace terms. Let’s forget the
whole thing.” And all of a sudden Red China came into the war as an ally of
the Soviet Union. And throwing them into the war brought about our defeat.
A crushing defeat, with reparations the likes of which man’s imagination
cannot encompass.
Imagine, then, after that defeat, if we found out that it was the Chinese in
this country, our Chinese citizens, who all the time we thought they were
loyal citizens working with us, were selling us out to the Soviet Union and
that it was through them that Red China was brought into the war against us.
How would we feel, in the United States against Chinese ? I don’t think that
one of them would dare show his face on any street. There wouldn’t be
lampposts enough, convenient, to take care of them. Imagine how we would
Well, that’s how the Germans felt towards these Jews. “We’ve been so nice
to them”; and from 1905 on, when the first Communist revolution in Russia
failed, and the Jews had to scramble out of Russia, they all went to
Germany. And Germany gave them refuge. And they were treated very
nicely. And here they sold Germany down the river for no reason at all other
than they wanted Palestine as a so-called “Jewish commonwealth.”
Now, Nahum Sokolow — all the great leaders, the big names that you read
about in connection with Zionism today — they, in 1919, 1920, ’21, ’22, and
’23, they wrote in all their papers — and the press was filled with their
statements — that “the feeling against the Jews in Germany is due to the fact
that they realized that this great defeat was brought about by our intercession
and bringing the United States into the war against them.”
The Jews themselves admitted that. It wasn’t that the Germans in 1919
discovered that a glass of Jewish blood tasted better than Coca-Cola or
Muenschner Beer. There was no religious feeling. There was no sentiment
against those people merely on account of their religious belief. It was all
political. It was economic. It was anything but religious.
Nobody cared in Germany whether a Jew went home and pulled down the
shades and said ?Shema’ Yisrael? or ?Our Father.? No one cared in
Germany any more than they do in the United States. Now this feeling that
developed later in Germany was due to one thing: that the Germans held the
Jews responsible for their crushing defeat, for no reason at all, because
World War One was started against Germany for no reason for which they
[Germans] were responsible. They were guilty of nothing. Only of being
successful. They built up a big navy. They built up world trade.
You must remember, Germany, at the time of Napoleon, at the time of the
French Revolution, what was the German Reich consisted of 300 — three
hundred ! — small city-states, principalities, dukedoms, and so forth. Three
hundred little separate political entities. And between that time, between the
period of… between Napoleon and Bismarck, they were consolidated into
one state. And within 50 years after that time they became one of the world’s
great powers. Their navy was rivalling Great Britain’s, they were doing
business all over the world, they could undersell anybody and make better
products. And what happened? What happened as a result of that ?
There was a conspiracy between England, France, and Russia that: “We
must slap down Germany”, because there isn’t one historian in the world that
can find a valid reason why those three countries decided to wipe Germany
off the map politically. Now, what happened after that ?
When Germany realized that the Jews were responsible for her defeat, they
naturally resented it. But not a hair on the head of any Jew was harmed. Not
a single hair. Professor Tansill, of Georgetown University, who had access
to all the secret papers of the State Department, wrote in his book, and
quoted from a State Department document written by Hugo Schoenfelt, a
Jew who Cordell Hull sent to Europe in 1933 to investigate the so-called
camps of political prisoners. And he wrote back that he found them in very
fine condition.
They were in excellent shape; everybody treated well. And they were filled
with Communists. Well, a lot of them were Jews, because the Jews happened
to be maybe 98 per cent of the Communists in Europe at that time. And there
were some priests there, and ministers, and labor leaders, Masons, and others
who had international affiliations.
Now, the Jews sort of tried to keep the lid on this fact. They didn’t want the
world to really understand that they had sold out Germany, and that the
Germans resented that.
So they did take appropriate action against them [against the Jews]. They. . .
shall I say, discriminated against them wherever they could ? They shunned
them. The same as we would the Chinese, or the Negroes, or the Catholics,
or anyone in this country who had sold us out to an enemy and brought
about our defeat.
Now, after a while, the Jews of the world didn’t know what to do, so they
called a meeting in Amsterdam. Jews from every country in the world
attended in July 1933. And they said to Germany: ?You fire Hitler! And you
put every Jew back into his former position, whether he was a Communist,
no matter what he was. You can’t treat us that way! And we, the Jews of the
world, are calling upon you, and serving this ultimatum upon you.? Well, the
Germans told them… you can imagine. So what did they [the Jews] do?
They broke up, and Samuel Untermyer, if the name means anything to
people here… (You want to ask a question? — Uh, there were no
Communists in Germany at that time, they were called ‘Social Democrats.)
Well, I don’t want to go by what they were called. We’re now using English
words, and what they were called in Germany is not very material. . . but
they were Communists, because in 1917, the Communists took over
Germany for a few days. Rosa Luxembourg and Karl Liebknecht, and a
group of Jews in Germany took over the government for three days. In fact,
when the Kaiser ended the war, he fled to Holland because he thought the
Communists were going to take over Germany as they did Russia, and that
he was going to meet the same fate that the Czar did in Russia. So he left and
went to Holland for safety and for security.
Now, at that time, when the Communist threat in Germany was quashed, it
was quiet, the Jews were working, still trying to get back into their former —
their status — and the Germans fought them in every way they could, without
hurting a hair on anyone’s head. The same as one group, the Prohibitionists,
fought the people who were interested in liquor, and they didn’t fight one
another with pistols, they did it every way they could.
Well, that’s the way they were fighting the Jews in Germany. And, at that
time, mind you, there were 80 to 90 million Germans and there were only
460,000 Jews. . . less than one half of one percent of Germany were Jews.
And yet, they controlled all of the press, they controlled most of the
economy, because they had come in and with cheap money — you know the
way the Mark was devalued — they bought up practically everything.
Well, in 1933 when Germany refused to surrender, mind you, to the World
Conference of Jews in Amsterdam, they broke up and Mr. Untermeyer came
back to the United States — who was the head of the American delegation
and the president of the whole conference — and he went from the steamer to
ABC and made a radio broadcast throughout the United States in which he
“The Jews of the world now declare a Holy War against Germany. We are
now engaged in a sacred conflict against the Germans. And we are going to
starve them into surrender. We are going to use a world-wide boycott against
them, that will destroy them because they are dependent upon their export
And it is a fact that two thirds of Germany’s food supply had to be imported,
and it could only be imported with the proceeds of what they exported. Their
labor. So if Germany could not export, two thirds of Germany’s population
would have to starve. There just was not enough food for more than one
third of the population.
Now in this declaration, which I have here, it was printed on page — a whole
page — in the New York Times on August 7, 1933, Mr. Samuel Untermyer
boldly stated that: “this economic boycott is our means of self-defense.
President Roosevelt has advocated its use in the NRA” . [National Recovery
Administration] — which some of you may remember, where everybody was
to be boycotted unless they followed the rules laid down by the New Deal,
which of course was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court at that
Nevertheless, the Jews of the world declared a boycott against Germany, and
it was so effective that you couldn’t find one thing in any store anywhere in
the world with the words “made in Germany” on it.
In fact, an executive of the Woolworth Company told me that they had to
dump millions of dollars worth of crockery and dishes into the river; that
their stores were boycotted. If anyone came in and found a dish marked
“made in Germany,” they were picketed with signs: “Hitler”, “murderer”,
and so forth, and like — something like these sit-ins that are taking place in
the South.
R. H. Macy, which is controlled by a family called Strauss who also happen
to be Jews. . . a woman found stockings there which came from Chemnitz,
marked “made in Germany”. Well, they were cotton stockings. They may
have been there 20 years, because since I’ve been observing women’s legs in
the last twenty years, I haven’t seen a pair with cotton stockings on them. So
Macy ! I saw Macy boycotted, with hundreds of people walking around with
signs saying “MURDERS” and “HITLERITES”, and so forth.
Now up to that time, not one hair on the head of any Jew had been hurt in
Germany. There was no suffering, there was no starvation, there was no
murder, there was nothing.
Now, that… naturally, the Germans said, “Why, who are these people to
declare a boycott against us and throw all our people out of work, and our
industries come to a standstill ? Who are they to do that to us?” They
naturally resented it. Certainly they painted swastikas on stores owned by
Why should a German go in and give their money to a storekeeper who was
part of a boycott who was going to starve Germany into surrender into the
Jews of the world, who were going to dictate who their premier or chancellor
was to be? Well, it was ridiculous.
That continued for some time, and it wasn’t until 1938, when a young Jew
from Poland walked into the German embassy in Paris and shot one of the
officials [a German official] that the Germans really started to get rough with
the Jews in Germany. And you found them then breaking windows and
having street fights and so forth.
Now, for anyone to say that — I don’t like to use the word ‘anti-Semitism’
because it’s meaningless, but it means something to you still, so I’ll have to
use it — the only reason that there was any feeling in Germany against Jews
was that they were responsible: number one, for World War One; number
two, for this world-wide boycott, and number three — did I say for World
War One, they were responsible? For the boycott — and also for World War
II, because after this thing got out of hand, it was absolutely necessary for
the Jews and Germany to lock horns in a war to see which one was going to
In the meanwhile, I had lived in Germany, and I knew that the Germans had
decided [that] Europe is going to be Christian or Communist: there is no in
between. It’s going to be Christian or it’s going to be Communist. And the
Germans decided: “We’re going to keep it Christian if possible”. And they
started to re-arm.
And there intention was — by that time the United States had recognized the
Soviet Union, which they did in November, 1933 — the Soviet Union was
becoming very powerful, and Germany realized: “Well, our turn is going to
come soon, unless we are strong.” The same as we in this country are saying
today, “Our turn is going to come soon, unless we are strong.”
And our government is spending 83 or 84 billion dollars of your money for
defense, they say.Defense against whom ? Defense against 40,000 little Jews
in Moscow that took over Russia, and then, in their devious ways, took over
control of many other governments of the world.
Now, for this country to now be on the verge of a Third World War, from
which we cannot emerge a victor, is something that staggers my
imagination. I know that nuclear bombs are measured in terms of megatons.
A megaton is a term used to describe one million tons of TNT. One million
tons of TNT is a megaton. Now, our nuclear bombs have a capacity of 10
megatons, or 10 million tons of TNT. That was when they were first
developed five or six years ago. Now, the nuclear bombs that are being
developed have a capacity of 200 megatons, and God knows how many
megatons the nuclear bombs of the Soviet Union have.
So, what do we face now ? If we trigger a world war that may develop into a
nuclear war, humanity is finished. And why will it take place ? It will take
place because Act III… the curtain goes up on Act III. Act I was World War
I. Act II was World War II. Act III is going to be World War III.
The Jews of the world, the Zionists and their co-religionists everywhere, are
determined that they are going to again use the United States to help them
permanently retain Palestine as their foothold for their world government.
Now, that is just as true as I am standing here, because not alone have I read
it, but many here have read it, and it’s known all over the world.
Now, what are we going to do ? The life you save may be your son’s. Your
boys may be on their way to that war tonight; and you you don’t know it any
more than you knew that in 1916 in London the Zionists made a deal with
the British War Cabinet to send your sons to war in Europe. Did you know it
at that time? Not a person in the United States knew it. You weren’t
permitted to know it.
Who knew it ? President Wilson knew it. Colonel House knew it. Other ‘s
knew it. Did I know it ? I had a pretty good idea of what was going on: I was
liaison to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., in the 1912 campaign when President
Wilson was elected, and there was talk around the office there.
I was ‘confidential man’ to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., who was chairman of the
Finance Committee, and I was liaison between him and Rollo Wells, the
treasurer. So I sat in these meetings with President Wilson at the head of the
table, and all the others, and I heard them drum into President Wilson’s brain
the graduated income tax and what has become the Federal Reserve, and also
indoctrinate him with the Zionist movement.
Justice Brandeis and President Wilson were just as close as the two fingers
on this hand, and President Woodrow Wilson was just as incompetent when
it came to determining what was going on as a newborn baby. And that’s
how they got us into World War I, while we all slept. They sent our boys
over there to be slaughtered. For what? So the Jews can have Palestine as
their “commonwealth.” They’ve fooled you so much that you don’t know
whether you’re coming or going.
Now any judge, when he charges a jury, says, “Gentlemen, any witness that
you find has told a single lie, you can disregard all his testimony.” That is
correct. I don’t know from what state you come, but in New York state that
is the way a judge addresses a jury. If that witness said one lie, disregard his
Now, what are the facts about the Jews ?
The Jews — I call them Jews to you, because they are known as Jews. I don’t
call them Jews. I refer to them as so-called Jews, because I know what they
are. If Jesus was a Jew, there isn’t a Jew in the world today, and if those
people are Jews, certainly our Lord and Savior was not one of them, and I
can prove that.
Now what happened ? The eastern European Jews, who form 92 per cent of
the world’s population of those people who call themselves Jews, were
originally Khazars.
They were a warlike tribe that lived deep in the heart of Asia. And they were
so warlike that even the Asiatics drove them out of Asia into eastern Europe
— and to reduce this so you don’t get too confused about the history of
Eastern Europe — they set up this big Khazar kingdom: 800,000 square
miles. Only, there was no Russia, there were no other countries, and the
Khazar kingdom was the biggest country in all Europe — so big and so
powerful that when the other monarchs wanted to go to war, the Khazars
would lend them 40,000 soldiers. That’s how big and powerful they were.
Now, they were phallic worshippers, which is filthy. I don’t want to go into
the details of that now. It was their religion the way it was the religion of
many other Pagans or Barbarians elsewhere in the world. The Khazar king
became so disgusted with the degeneracy of his kingdom that he decided to
adopt a so-called monotheistic faith – either Christianity, Islam — the moslem
faith — or what is known today as Judaism, which is really Talmudism. By
spinning a top, and calling out “eeny, meeny, miney, moe,” he picked out socalled
Judaism. And that became the state religion.
And he sent down to the Talmudic schools of Pumbedita and Sura and
brought up thousands of these rabbis with their teachings, and opened up
synagogues and schools in his kingdom of 800,000 people — 800,000
thousand square miles — and maybe ten to twenty million people; and they
became what we call Jews. There wasn’t one of them that had an ancestor
that ever put a toe in the Holy Land, not only in Old Testament history, but
back to the beginning of time. Not one of them! And yet they come to the
Christians and they ask us to support their armed insurrection in Palestine by
“Well, you want to certainly help repatriate God’s chosen people to their
Promised Land, their ancestral homeland, It’s your Christian duty. We gave
you one of our boys as your Lord and Savior. You now go to church on
Sunday, and kneel and you worship a Jew, and we’re Jews.”
Well, they were pagan Khazars who were converted just the same as the
Irish [were converted]. And it’s just as ridiculous to call them “people of the
Holy Land,” as it would be… there are 54 million Chinese Moslems. Fifty
four million ! And, Mohammed only died in 620 A.D., so in that time, 54
million Chinese have accepted Islam as their religious belief.
Now imagine, in China, 2,000 miles away from Arabia, where the city of
Mecca is located, where Mohammed was born… imagine if the 54 million
Chinese called themselves ‘Arabs’. Imagine ! Why, you’d say they’re lunatics.
Any man that believes that those 54 million Chinese are Arabs must be
crazy. All they did was adopt as a religious faith; a belief that had its origin
in Mecca, in Arabia.
The same as the Irish. When the Irish became Christians, nobody dumped
them in the ocean and imported from the Holy Land a new crop of
inhabitants that were Christians. That were christians of flesh and blood.
They weren’t different people. They were the same people, but they had
accepted Christianity as a religious faith.
Now, these Pagans, these Asiatics, these Turko-Finns… they were a
Mongoloid race who were forced out of Asia into eastern Europe. They
likewise, because their king took the faith — Talmudic faith — they had no
choice. Just the same as in Spain: If the king was Catholic, everybody had to
be a Catholic. If not, you had to get out of Spain. So everybody — they lived
on the land just like the trees and the bushes; a human being belonged to the
land under their feudal system — so they [Khazars] all became what we call
today, Jews !
Now imagine how silly it was for the Christians… for the great Christian
countries of the world to say, “We’re going to use our power, our prestige to
help repatriate God’s chosen people to their ancestral homeland, their
Promised Land.”
Now, could there be a bigger lie than that ? Could there be a bigger lie than
that ?
And because they control the newspapers, the magazines, the radio, the
television, the book publishing business, they have the ministers in the
pulpit, they have the politicians on the soap boxes talking the same language
… so naturally you’d believe black is white if you heard it often enough. You
wouldn’t call black black anymore — you’d start to call black white. And
nobody could blame you.
Now, that is one of the great lies… that is the foundation of all the misery
that has befallen the world. Because after two wars fought in Europe —
World War I and World War II — if it wasn’t possible for them to live in
peace and harmony with the people in Europe, like their brethren are living
in the United States, what were the two wars fought for ? Did they have to —
like you flush the toilet — because they couldn’t get along, did they have to
say, “Well, we’re going back to our homeland and you Christians can help
us” ?
I can’t understand yet how the Christians in Europe could have been that
dumb because every theologian, every history teacher, knew the things that
I’m telling you. But, they naturally bribed them, shut them up with money,
stuffed their mouths with money, and now… I don’t care whether you know
all this or not. It doesn’t make any difference to me whether you know all
these facts or not, but it does make a difference to me. I’ve got, in my family,
boys that will have to be in the next war, and I don’t want them to go and
fight and die… like they died in Korea. Like they died in Japan. Like they’ve
died all over the world. For what ?
To help crooks hold on to what they stole from innocent people who had
been in peaceful possession of that land, those farms, those homes for
hundreds and maybe thousands of years ? Is that why the United States must
go to war ? Because the Democratic Party wants New York State — the
electoral vote? Illinois, the electoral vote ? And Pennsylvania, the electoral
vote ?… which are controlled by the Zionists and their co-religionists ?… the
balance of power ?
In New York City there are 400,000 members of the liberal party, all
Zionists and their co-religionists. And New York State went for Kennedy by
400,000 votes. Now, I don’t blame Mr. Kennedy. I’m fond of Mr. Kennedy. I
think he’s a great man. I think he can really pull us out of this trouble if we
get the facts to him. And I believe he knows a great deal more than his
appointments indicate he knows. He’s playing with the enemy. Like when
you go fishing, you’ve got to play with the fish. Let ’em out and pull ’em in.
Let ’em out and pull ’em in. But knowing Mr. Kennedy’s father, and how
well informed he is on this whole subject, and how close Kennedy is to his
father, I don’t think Mr. Kennedy is totally in the dark.
But I do think that it is the duty of every mother, every loyal Christian ,
every person that regards the defense of this country as a sacred right, that
they communicate — not with their congressman, not with their senator, but
with President Kennedy. And tell him, “I do not think you should send my
boy, or our boys, wearing the uniform of the United States of America, and
under the flag that you see here, our red, white and blue, to fight there to
help keep in the hands of these that which they have stolen”. I think
everyone should not alone write once, but keep writing and get your friends
to write.
Now, I could go on endlessly, and tell you these things to support what I
have just asked you to do. But I don’t think it’s necessary to do that. You’re
above the average group in intelligence and I don’t think it’s necessary to
impress this any more.
But… I want to tell you one more thing. You talk about… “Oh, the Jews.
Why the Jews ? Christianity. Why, we got Christianity from the Jews and
the Jews gave us Jesus, and the Jews gave us our religion”. But do you know
that on the day of atonement that you think is so sacred to them, that on that
day… and I was one of them ! This is not hearsay. I’m not here to be a
rabble-rouser. I’m here to give you facts.
When, on the Day of Atonement, you walk into a synagogue, the very first
prayer that you recite, you stand — and it’s the only prayer for which you
stand — and you repeat three times a short prayer. The Kol Nidre. In that
prayer, you enter into an agreement with God Almighty that any oath, vow,
or pledge that you may make during the next twelve months — any oath, vow
or pledge that you may take during the next twelve months shall be null and
The oath shall not be an oath; the vow shall not be a vow; the pledge shall
not be a pledge. They shall have no force and effect, and so forth and so on.
And further than that, the Talmud teaches: “Don’t forget — whenever you
take an oath, vow, and pledge — remember the Kol Nidre prayer that you
recited on the Day of Atonement, and that exempts you from fulfilling that”.
How much can you depend on their loyalty ? You can depend upon their
loyalty as much as the Germans depended upon it in 1916.
And we’re going to suffer the same fate as Germany suffered, and for the
same reason. You can’t depend upon something as insecure as the leadership
that is not obliged to respect an oath, vow or pledge. Now I could go on and
recite many other things to you, but I would have a little respect for your
time, and you want to really, uh, get through with all of this. Tomorrow’s
going to be a long day.
Now I want to say one thing. You ask me… well, you think to yourself: “well
how did this fellow get mixed up in this the way he got mixed up in it.”
Well, I opened my mouth in 1945, and I took big pages in newspapers and
tried to tell the American people what I’m telling you. And one newspaper
after another refused the advertisement. And when I couldn’t find a
newspaper to take them — I paid cash, not credit — what happened ? My
lawyer told me, “There’s an editor over in Jersey with a paper who will take
your announcement”. So, I was brought together with Mr. McGinley, and
that’s how I met him.
So somebody told me the lawyer who introduced me, who was the son of the
Dean of the Methodist Bishop, he said: “Well, I think he’s a little anti-
Semitic. I don’t know whether I can get him over here. So he brought him
over to my apartment and we hit it off wonderfully, and have since then.
Now, I say this, and I say it without any qualifications. I say it without any
reservations. And I say it without any hesitation. . . if it wasn’t for the work
that Mr. Conley McGinley did with “Common Sense” — he’s been sending
out from 1,800,000 to 2,000,000 every year — if it wasn’t for the work he’s
been doing sending those out for fifteen years now, we would already be a
communist country. Nobody has done what he did to light fires. Many of the
other active persons in this fight learned all about if for the first time through
“Common Sense”.
Now, I have been very active in helping him all I could. I’m not as flush as I
was. I cannot go on spending the money… I’m not going to take up a
collection. Don’t worry. I see five people getting up to leave. (laughter)
I haven’t got the money that I used to spend. I used to print a quarter of a
million of them out of my own pocket and send them out. Mr. McGinley,
when I first met him, had maybe 5,000 printed and circulated them locally.
So I said, “With what you know and what I know, we can really do a good
job”. So I started printing in outside shops of big newspaper companies, a
quarter of a million, and paid for them. Well, there’s always a bottom to the
barrel. I suppose we’ve all reached that at times.
I’m not so poor that I can’t live without working and that’s what worries the
Anti-Defamation League. I can just get by without going and asking for a
job or getting on the bread line. But Mr. McGinley is working. He’s sick and
he’s going at this stronger than ever. And all I want to say is that they want
to close up “Common Sense” more than any other single thing in the whole
world, as a death-blow to the fight Christians are making to survive.
So I just want to tell you this. All they do is circulate rumors: “Mr. Benjamin
H. Freedman is the wealthy backer of ‘Common Sense’.” The reason they do
that is to discourage the people in the United States: don’t send any money to
Common Sense. They don’t need it. The’ve got the wealthy Mr. Freedman as
a backer. That all has strategy. They don’t want to advertise me so that
people that have real estate or securities to sell will come and call on me.
They just want people to lay off “Common Sense”. And all I’m telling you is,
I do try to help him, but I haven’t been able to. And I will be very honest.
One thing I won’t do is lie. In the last year I’ve had so much sickness in my
family that I could not give him one dollar.
How he’s managed to survive, I don’t know. God alone knows. And he must
be in God’s care because how he’s pulled through his sickness and with his
financial troubles, I don’t know. But that press is working… and every two
weeks about a hundred or a hundred-fifty-thousand of “Common Sense” go
out with a new message. And if that information could be multiplied… if
people that now get it could buy ten or twenty five, or fifty, give them
around. Plow that field. Sow those seeds, you don’t know which will take
root, but for God’s sake, this is our last chance.
[Freedman then discusses the importance of people forgoing unnecessary
purchases to ‘buy more stuff’, play golf, etc., and use the money to keep
“Common Sense” going. He explains that the paper is going in debt; could
be closed down and he (Freedman) no longer has the funds, having spent
some $2,400,000 in his attempt to bring the information to the American
public and elected officials. He then asks for questions from the audience.]
{Question inaudible]
Freedman: All right, I’ll comment on that. This is rather deep, but you all
have a very high degree of intelligence, so I’m going to make an attempt. In
the time of Bible history, there was a geographic area known as Judea. Judea
was a province of the Roman Empire. Now, a person who lived in Judea was
known as a Judean, and in Latin it was Judaeus; in Greek it was Judaius.
Those are the two words, in Greek and Latin, for a Judean.
Now, in Latin and Greek there is no such letter as ‘j’, and the first syllable of
Judaeus and Judaius starts ‘ghu’. Now, when the Bible was written, it was
first written in Greek, Latin, Panantic, Syriac, Aramaic… all those languages.
Never Was the word Jew in any of them because the word didn’t exist. Judea
was the country, and the people were Judeans, and Jesus was referred to only
as a Judean. I’ve seen those early… the earliest scripts available.
In 1345, a man by the name of Wycliffe in England thought that it was time
to translate the Bible into English. There was no English edition of the Bible
because who the Devil could read ? It was only the educated church people
who could read Latin and Greek, Syriac, Aramaic and the other languages.
Anyhow, Wycliffe translated the Bible into English. And he did. But in it, he
had to look around for some words for Judaeas and Judaius.
There was no English word because Judea had passed out of existence.
There was no Judea. People had long ago forgotten that. So in the first
translation he used the word, in referring to Jesus, as ‘gyu’, “jew”. At the
time, there was no printing press.
Now, between 1345 and the 17th century, when the press came into use, that
word passed through so many changes… I have them all here. If you want I
can read them to you. I will. That word ‘gyu’ which was in the Wycliffe
Bible became. . . first it was ‘ gyu ‘, then ‘ giu ‘, then ‘ iu ‘ (because the ‘ i ‘ in
Latin is pronounced like the ‘ j ‘. Julius Caesar is ‘ Iul ‘ because there is no ‘j’
in Latin) then ‘ iuw ‘, then ‘ ieuu ‘, then ‘ ieuy ‘, then ‘ iwe ‘, then ‘ iow ‘, then ‘
iewe ‘, all in Bibles as time went on. Then ‘ ieue ‘, then ‘ iue ‘, then ‘ ive ‘, and
then ‘ ivw ‘, and finally in the 18th century… ‘ jew ‘. Jew.
All the corrupt and contracted forms for Judaius, and Judaeas in Latin. Now,
there was no such thing as ‘Jew’, and any theologian — I’ve lectured in maybe
20 of the most prominent theological seminaries in this country, and two in
Europe — there was no such word as Jew. There only was Judea, and Jesus
was a Judean and the first English use of a word in an English bible to
describe him was ‘gyu’ — Jew. A contracted and shortened form of Judaeus,
just the same as we call a laboratory a ‘lab’, and gasoline ‘gas’… a tendency to
short up. [A few words are missing here]
But [a few words are missing here] in England there were no public schools;
people didn’t know how to read; it looked like a scrambled alphabet so they
made a short word out of it. Now for a theologian to say that you can’t harm
the Jews, is just ridiculous. I’d like to know where in the scriptures it says
that. I’d like to know the text.
Look at what happened to Germany for touching Jews. What would you, as
a citizen of the United States, do to people who did to you what the so-called
Jews — the Pollacks and Litvaks and Litzianers — they weren’t Jews, as I just
explained to you. They were Eastern Europeans who’d been converted to
Talmudism. There was no such thing as Judaism. Judaism was a name given
in recent years to this religion known in Bible history as Torah [inaudible].
No Jew or no educated person ever heard of Judaism. It didn’t exist. They
pulled it out of the air… a meaningless word.
Just like ‘anti-Semitic’. The Arab is a Semite. And the Christians talk about
people who don’t like Jews as anti-Semites, and they call all the Arabs anti-
Semites. The only Semites in the world are the Arabs. There isn’t one Jew
who’s a Semite. They’re all Turkothean Mongoloids. The Eastern european
Jews. So, they brainwashed the public, and if you will invite me to meet this
reverend who told you these things, I’ll convince him and it’ll be one step in
the right direction. I’ll go wherever I have to go to meet him.
Yes, ma’am. Well… I can answer that. First of all, your first premise is
wrong. Your first premise that all the Jews are loyal to each other is wrong.
Because, the Eastern European Jews outnumber all the rest by so many that
they create the impression that they are the Jewish ‘race’; that they are the
Jewish nation; that they are the Jewish people. . . and the Christians swallow
it like a cream puff.
But in 1844 the German rabbis called a conference of rabbis from all over
the world for the purpose of abolishing the Kol Nidre from the Day of
Atonement religious ceremony. In Brunswick, Germany, where that
conference was held in 1844, there was almost a terrific riot. A civil war.
The Eastern Europeans said, “What the hell. We should give up Kol Nidre ?
That gives us our grip on our people. We give them a franchise so they can
tell the Christians, ‘Go to hell. We’ll make any deal you want’, but they don’t
have to carry it out. That gives us our grip on our people”. So, they’re not so
united, and if you knew the feeling that exists.
Now, I’ll also show you from an official document by the man responsible
for. . . uh, who baptized this race. Here is a paper that we obtained from the
archives of the Zionist organization in New York City, and in it is the
manuscript by Sir James A. Malcolm, who — on behalf of the British
Cabinet — negotiated the deal with these Zionists.
And in here he says that all the jews in England were against it. The Jews
who had been there for years, the [inaudible – probably Sephardim], those
who had Portuguese and Spanish ad Dutch ancestry… who were monotheists
and believed in that religious belief. That was while the Eastern European
Jews were still running around in the heart of Asia and then came into
Europe. But they had no more to do with them than. . . can we talk about a
Christian ‘race’ ? or a Christian religion ?… or are the Christians united ?
So the same disunity is among the Jews. And I’ll show you in this same
document that when they went to France to try and get the French
government to back that Zionist venture, there was only one Jew in France
who was for it. That was Rothschild, and they did it because they were
interested in the oil and the Suez Canal.
[Question inaudible] Freedman: You know why ? Because if they don’t,
they’re decked up. They come around and they tell you how much you must
give, and if you don’t . . . oh, you’re anti-Semitic. Then none of their friends
will have anything to do with them, and they start a smear campaign… and
you have got to give.
In New York city, in the garment center, there are twelve manufacturers in
the building. And when the drive is on to sell Israel Bonds, the United
Jewish Drive, they put a big scoreboard with the names of the firms and
opposite them, as you make the amount they put you down for, they put a
gold star after the name. Then, the buyers are told, “When you come into
that building to call on someone and they haven’t got a gold star, tell them
that you won’t buy from them until they have the gold star”. BLACKMAIL.
I don’t know what else you can call it.
Then what do they do ? They tell you it’s for ‘humanitarian purposes’ and
they send maybe $8 billion dollars to Israel, tax exempt, tax deductible. So if
they hadn’t sent that eight billion dollars to Israel, seven billion of it would
have gone into the U.S. Treasury as income tax. So what happens ? That
seven billion dollars deficit — that air pocket — the gullible Christians have
to make up.
They put a bigger tax on gas or bread or corporation tax. Somebody has to
pay the housekeeping expenses for the government. So why do you let these
people send their money over there to buy guns to drive people out of their
ancient homeland ? And you say, “Oh, well. The poor Jews. They have no
place to go and they’ve been persecuted all their lives”. They’ve never been
persecuted for their religion. And I wish I had two rows of Rabbis here to
challenge me. Never once, in all of history, have they been persecuted for
their religion.
Do you know why the Jews were driven out of England ? King Edward the
First in 1285 drove them out, and they never came back until the Cromwell
Revolution which was financed by the Rothschilds. For four-hundred years
there wasn’t a Jew. But do you know why they were driven out ? Because in
the Christian faith and the Moslem faith it’s a sin to charge ‘rent’ for the use
of money. In other words – what we call interest [usury] is a sin.
So the Jews had a monopoly in England and they charged so much interest,
and when the Lords and Dukes couldn’t pay, they [Jews] foreclosed. And
they were creating so much trouble that the king of England finally made
himself their partner, because when they they came to foreclose, some of
these dukes bumped off the Jews. . . the money-lenders. So the king finally
said — and this is all in history, look up Tianson [Tennyson?] or Rourke, the
History of the Jews in England; two books you can find in your library.
When the king found out what the trouble was all about, and how much
money they were making, he declared himself a fifty-percent partner of the
money lenders. Edward the First. And for many years, one-third of the
revenues of the British Treasury came from the fifty-percent interest in
money-lending by the Jews.
But it got worse and worse. So much worse that when the Lords and Dukes
kept killing the money-lenders, the King then said, “I declare myself the heir
of all the money-lenders. If they’re killed you have to pay me, because I’m
his sole heir”. That made so much trouble, because the King had to go out
and collect the money with an army, so he told the Jews “get the hell out of
here”. There were 15,000 of them, and they had to get out, and they went
across to Ireland, and that’s how Ireland got to be part of the United
When King Edward found out what they were doing, he decided to take
Ireland for himself before someone else did. He sent Robert Southgard with
a mercenary army and conquered Ireland. So, show me one time where a
Jew was persecuted in any country because of his religion. It has never
happened. It’s always their impact on the political, social, or economic
customs and traditions of the community in which they settle.
[Question inaudible] Freedman: Yes, sir. Well, they say most of those things
themselves. It was unnecessary for Benjamin Franklin to say it. Most of
those things they say themselves. But Benjamin Franklin observed, and by
hearsay understood, what was happening in Europe.
When Russia, in 920 was formed, and gradually surrounded the Khazar
Kingdom, and absorbed them, most of the well-to-do Khazars fled to
Western Europe and brought with them the very things to which you object
and I object and a lot of other people object. The customs, the habits, the
instincts with which they were endowed.
Now, when Benjamin Franklin referred to them as Jews because that’s the
name that they went by. Thats the name that they took. And the Christians,
when they first heard that these people who were fleeing from Russia — who
they were — that they had practiced this Talmudic faith — the Christians in
Western Europe said, “They must be the remnants of the lost ten tribes!”
And Mr. Grutz, the greatest historian amongst the Jews, said that — and he’s
probably as good an authority on that subject as there is. So when Ben
Franklin came to Europe in the 18th century, he already saw the results of
what these people had done after they left their homeland. And every word
of it is true… they themselves say it. I can give you half a dozen books
they’ve written in which they say the same thing: When they have money
they become tyrants. And when they become defeated, they become ruthless.
They’re only barbarians. They’re the descendants of Asiatic Mongols and
they will do anything to accomplish their purpose.
What right did they have to take over Russia the way they did ? The Czar
had abdicated nine or ten months before that. There was no need for them. . .
they were going to have a constitutional monarchy. But they didn’t want that.
When the constitutional monarchy was to assemble in November, they
mowed them all down and established the Soviet Union.
There was no need for that. But they thought, “Now is the time”, and if you
you will look in the Encyclopedia Britannica under the word ‘Bolshevism’,
you’ll find the five laws there that Lenin put down for a successful
revolution. One of them is, “Wait for the right time, and then give them
everything you’ve got”. It would pay you to read that.
You’d also find that Mr. Harold Blacktree, who wrote the article for the
Encyclopedia Britannica states that the Jews conceived and created and
cultivated the Communist movement. And that their energy made them the
spearhead of the movement. Harold Blacktree wrote it and no one knew
more about Communism than he. And the Encyclopedia Britannica for 25
years has been printing it.
[Question inaudible] Freedman: Well, I can’t advocate that you do anything
that’s criminal, but I can tell you this. You can start what I call an endless
chain. If you can get your friends to write, objectively, here is the statement:
Mr. Kennedy’s office gave me this himself. Mr. Smith, who succeeded Mr.
Kennedy, took over his office — was in his office — and gave me this. He
delivered this on the 25th, and it says here:
“For release to AM (that means morning papers), August 25th”. “Israel is
here to stay. It is a national commitment, special obligation of the
Democratic Party. The White House must take the lead. American
intervention. We will act promptly and decisively against any nation in the
Middle East which attacks its neighbor. I propose that we make clear to both
Israel and the Arab states our guarantee that we will act with whatever force
and speed are necessary to halt any aggression by any nation”.
Well, do you call the return of people to their homeland [the Arab
Palestinians] aggression ? Is Mr. Kennedy going to do that ? Suppose three
million Mexicans came into Texas and drove the six million Texans into the
deserts of Arizona and New Mexico. Suppose these Mexicans were slipped
in there armed — the Texans were disarmed — and one night they drove them
all out of Texas and declared themselves the Republic of the Alamo. What
would the United States say ?
Would we say it’s aggression for these Texans to try to get their homes back
from the Mexican thieves ? Suppose the Negroes in Alabama were secretly
armed by the Soviets and overnight they rose up and drove all the whites
into the swamps of Mississippi and Georgia and Florida. . . drove them out
completely, and declared themselves the Republic of Ham, or the Republic
of something-or-other. Would we call it aggression if these people, the
whites of Alabama, tried to go back to their homes ?
Would we. . . what would we think if the soviet Union said, “No, those
Negroes now occupy them ! Leave them there!”, or “No, those Mexicans are
in Texas. they declared themselves a sovereign state. Leave them there. You
have plenty of room in Utah and Nevada. Settle somewhere else”.
Would we call it aggression if the Alabama whites or the Texans wanted to
go back to their homes ? So now, you’ve got to write to President Kennedy
and say, “We do not consider it aggression in the sense that you use the
word, if these people want to return to their homes as the United Nations —
fifteen times in the last twelve years — called upon the Zionists in occupation
of Palestine to allow the Arab Palestinians to return to their former homes
and farms”.
[End of transcript of Benjamin Freedman speech, given in 1961 at the
Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C., on behalf of Conde McGinley’s patriotic
newspaper of that time, Common Sense.]